Re: Hewlett-Packard package conflicts

2005-07-08 Thread Gayle Lee Fairless
On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Hendrik Sattler wrote: > Am Freitag, 8. Juli 2005 16:25 schrieb Gayle Lee Fairless: > > Now that I think about it, maybe the command installed the already > > downloaded package instead of the one I compiled! > > Or maybe the sed command was not completely correct? Why don't y

Re: Hewlett-Packard package conflicts

2005-07-08 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Am Freitag, 8. Juli 2005 16:25 schrieb Gayle Lee Fairless: > Now that I think about it, maybe the command installed the already > downloaded package instead of the one I compiled! Or maybe the sed command was not completely correct? Why don't you just _manually_ take a look at that file, it's not

Re: Hewlett-Packard package conflicts

2005-07-08 Thread Gayle Lee Fairless
On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Derek Broughton wrote: > Hendrik Sattler wrote: > > > Am Freitag, 8. Juli 2005 06:18 schrieb Gayle Lee Fairless: > >> Gcomm:/home/gayle/drivers/hplip# dpkg --force-conflicts -i hplip*.deb > >> > >> I found out that I had to force it. > > > > Actually, the "force-conflicts" wa

Re: Hewlett-Packard package conflicts

2005-07-08 Thread Gayle Lee Fairless
On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Derek Broughton wrote: > Hendrik Sattler wrote: > > > Am Freitag, 8. Juli 2005 06:18 schrieb Gayle Lee Fairless: > >> Gcomm:/home/gayle/drivers/hplip# dpkg --force-conflicts -i hplip*.deb > >> > >> I found out that I had to force it. > > > > Actually, the "force-conflicts" wa

Re: Hewlett-Packard package conflicts

2005-07-08 Thread Derek Broughton
Hendrik Sattler wrote: > Am Freitag, 8. Juli 2005 06:18 schrieb Gayle Lee Fairless: >> Gcomm:/home/gayle/drivers/hplip# dpkg --force-conflicts -i hplip*.deb >> >> I found out that I had to force it. > > Actually, the "force-conflicts" was the wrong way :-( > It's easier and cleaner to edit the de

Re: Hewlett-Packard package conflicts

2005-07-08 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Am Freitag, 8. Juli 2005 06:18 schrieb Gayle Lee Fairless: > Gcomm:/home/gayle/drivers/hplip# dpkg --force-conflicts -i hplip*.deb > > I found out that I had to force it. Actually, the "force-conflicts" was the wrong way :-( It's easier and cleaner to edit the debian/control file and remove the fa

Re: Hewlett-Packard package conflicts

2005-07-07 Thread Gayle Lee Fairless
Hendrik Sattler wrote: Am Dienstag, 5. Juli 2005 16:29 schrieb Gayle Lee Fairless: I posted a question to Debian User about package conflicts between hpoj(sp?) and hplip(sp?) that are for parallel HP printers and usb HP printers. My HP 697C is parallel, and my HP psc1210 is usb. No

Re: Hewlett-Packard package conflicts

2005-07-05 Thread Gayle Lee Fairless
On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Hendrik Sattler wrote: > Am Dienstag, 5. Juli 2005 16:29 schrieb Gayle Lee Fairless: > > I posted a question to Debian User about package conflicts between > > hpoj(sp?) and hplip(sp?) that are for parallel HP printers and usb HP > > printers. My HP 697C is parallel, and my HP

Re: Hewlett-Packard package conflicts

2005-07-05 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Am Dienstag, 5. Juli 2005 16:29 schrieb Gayle Lee Fairless: > I posted a question to Debian User about package conflicts between > hpoj(sp?) and hplip(sp?) that are for parallel HP printers and usb HP > printers. My HP 697C is parallel, and my HP psc1210 is usb. No, hpoj and hplip should not conf