Hi, Ricardo!
On Thursday 10 April 2003 21:04, Ricardo Javier Cardenes Medina wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 07:30:20PM +0200, Mika Fischer wrote:
> > I guess you mean: that kmail puts the CRs in for signing is good,
> > but that it removes them again before sending is not :)
>
> Mmh... Now that
Hi, David!
On Thursday 10 April 2003 21:30, David Pye wrote:
> I wonder if this is what happens:
>
> I *know* in transit some of the CRs may get turned into CRLFs (Can't
> confirm when tho!) and therefore KMail assumes that this is certain
> to happen, and therefore signs the message with them in
I wonder if this is what happens:
I *know* in transit some of the CRs may get turned into CRLFs (Can't confirm
when tho!) and therefore KMail assumes that this is certain to happen, and
therefore signs the message with them in to ensure that things will match ok?
David
On Thursday 10 April 200
On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 07:30:20PM +0200, Mika Fischer wrote:
>
> I guess you mean: that kmail puts the CRs in for signing is good, but
> that it removes them again before sending is not :)
Mmh... Now that you say it, I should review it a bit. Probably Python's
SMTP module is CR'cing the message
Hi, Ricardo!
On Thursday 10 April 2003 11:12, Ricardo Javier Cardenes Medina wrote:
> > I just can't think of a reason why kmail would put them in there
> > (only in the signed part) then sign the message and then remov them
> > again befor sending the mail out :)
> > It just doesn't make any sens
On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 01:34:29AM +0200, Mika Fischer wrote:
> Hi, David!
>
> On Thursday 10 April 2003 01:29, David Pye wrote:
> > I [resume you're aware the ^M characters are actually DOS/Windows
> > carriage returns? ie CRLF, rather than the unix convention of just
> > LF..
>
> Yes, I know
Hmm...
I [resume you're aware the ^M characters are actually DOS/Windows carriage
returns? ie CRLF, rather than the unix convention of just LF..
David
'On Wednesday 09 April 2003 23:01, Mika Fischer wrote:
> Hi!
>
> [Keeping this on the list because it has something to do with kmail :)]
>
> S
Hi, David!
On Thursday 10 April 2003 01:29, David Pye wrote:
> I [resume you're aware the ^M characters are actually DOS/Windows
> carriage returns? ie CRLF, rather than the unix convention of just
> LF..
Yes, I know :)
I just can't think of a reason why kmail would put them in there (only
in
Hi!
Small addition...
On Thursday 10 April 2003 00:01, Mika Fischer wrote:
> 1. The behaviour is different between using the MTA via SMTP or via
> /usr/lib/sendmail.
This is wrong. The behaviour is actually the same.
> 3. As if this was not strange enough... here it comes :)
> If I send the mai
Hi!
[Keeping this on the list because it has something to do with kmail :)]
So back to my probblem from the "kmail & cryptplug anyone?" thread...
I ran several tests and this is what I found out:
1. The behaviour is different between using the MTA via SMTP or via
/usr/lib/sendmail. I couldn't
10 matches
Mail list logo
