On Saturday 01 June 2002 11:29 am, Jaakko Niemi wrote:
>
> We don't have any subscriptions from that domain even, so unless someone
> shows headers with more information, there's very little that we can do.
here you go:
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mx03.mrf.mail.rcn.net ([20
On Fri, 31 May 2002, Wolfgang Ratzka wrote:
> Am Freitag, 31. Mai 2002 22:49 schrieb Fred K Ollinger:
>
> >
> > I agree. This is unethical. So is sending spam. I suggest that one would
> > send two copies of spam back for each copy recieved. This is not as
> > unethical b/c one was spammed and one
On Friday 31 May 2002 03:02 pm, ben wrote:
[snip]
>
> i just checked the mail headers and followed up on the one seemingly
> sensible ip address in there. it's forged and belongs to the baltnet.ru
> domain. there's no whois entry for koenig.su while google returns a
> multitude of russian language
On Friday 31 May 2002 02:10 pm, Wolfgang Ratzka wrote:
> Am Freitag, 31. Mai 2002 22:49 schrieb Fred K Ollinger:
> > I agree. This is unethical. So is sending spam. I suggest that one would
> > send two copies of spam back for each copy recieved. This is not as
> > unethical b/c one was spammed and
Am Freitag, 31. Mai 2002 22:49 schrieb Fred K Ollinger:
>
> I agree. This is unethical. So is sending spam. I suggest that one would
> send two copies of spam back for each copy recieved. This is not as
> unethical b/c one was spammed and one is only returning the favor. If the
> spammer is manual
5 matches
Mail list logo
