Am Freitag, 31. Mai 2002 22:49 schrieb Fred K Ollinger:
>
> I agree. This is unethical. So is sending spam. I suggest that one would
> send two copies of spam back for each copy recieved. This is not as
> unethical b/c one was spammed and one is only returning the favor. If the
> spammer is manually sending out emails and gets a few replies back then
> this won't cause any trouble. But if one sends out unsolicited mail to a
> few million people and they get a few million back then they get what they
> dished out, tit for tat. If you are the only one sending mail back then
^^^^^^^^^^^
The problem is, that you can never be sure whether your "retribution" will
actually hit the right person. So you might fry some poor sys admin
who has enough trouble with his clueless users anyway ;-).
So apparently <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has subscribed to the mailing
list and has set up some smart-ass filter tool that blocks traffic from
the mailing list produces these silly automatic responses...
In this case the best solution would be for some list admin to remove
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
from the mailing list.
Regards
--
Wolfgang Ratzka
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
