Re: [desktop] why kde and gnome's menu situation sucks

2002-10-27 Thread csj
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002 21:57:12 -0400 Luke Seubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmm, that might be doable. It does add more complexity for the folks > working on the backend of all this stuff. And it adds another > slightly complicated question during install time possibily - > "Attention User

Re: [desktop] why kde and gnome's menu situation sucks

2002-10-25 Thread Tim Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > [ On Friday 25 October 2002 07:53 am, David Megginson wrote: ] > Why *wouldn't* a typical user want both Gnome and KDE apps on the main > menu? After all, if I've installed a spreadsheet, word processor, > browser, game, etc., I probably wan

Re: [desktop] why kde and gnome's menu situation sucks

2002-10-25 Thread David Megginson
Luke Seubert writes: > Hmm, that might be doable. It does add more complexity for the folks > working on the backend of all this stuff. And it adds another slightly > complicated question during install time possibily - "Attention User - Do > you want both Gnome and KDE apps showing up in yo

Re: [desktop] why kde and gnome's menu situation sucks

2002-10-25 Thread Jeff Waugh
> So we are supposed to throw the debian menu system aside, and use the > freedesktop stuff as replacement ? And all other WMs have to adapt ? Given that Debian's shift to the .desktop format has already been proposed (and work proceeds on its implementation), and that the menu system will need

Re: [desktop] why kde and gnome's menu situation sucks

2002-10-25 Thread Sven Luther
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 03:20:49PM +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote: > > > > I'm confused -- why do you say `No' when the rest of what you write seems > > to agree with what was said? > > > > That is, isn't vFolder/.desktop a _mechanism_, with which the debian menu > > structure could be conveniently dis

Re: [desktop] why kde and gnome's menu situation sucks

2002-10-25 Thread Sven Luther
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 09:57:12PM -0400, Luke Seubert wrote: > On 10/24/2002 6:29 PM, Nick Leverton at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I'm with the "Want to group like tasks with like" camp, myself. But why > > not make it an Option[tm] ? Have a configurable bit in the menu program > > called "F

Re: [desktop] why kde and gnome's menu situation sucks

2002-10-25 Thread Jeff Waugh
> I'm confused -- why do you say `No' when the rest of what you write seems > to agree with what was said? > > That is, isn't vFolder/.desktop a _mechanism_, with which the debian menu > structure could be conveniently displayed by Gnome/KDE (replacing the > normal Gnome/KDE menu structure)? No

Re: [desktop] why kde and gnome's menu situation sucks

2002-10-25 Thread Paul
Hello Luke, On Thu, 24 Oct 2002 22:18:47 -0400 Luke Seubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >This would tend to argue in favor of segregated menus then, > with GTK apps showing up when one is using the Gnome desktop, and QT apps > showing up when one is in the KDE desktop. But GTK is not Gnome. What

Re: [desktop] why kde and gnome's menu situation sucks

2002-10-25 Thread Miles Bader
Jeff Waugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > In other words, we should be using a unified Debian menu structure > > > with appropriate tweaks for certain environments (and in > > > particular, _not_ using the default Gnome/KDE menu structures). > > > > Yup. > > No... The point behind the vFolde

Re: [desktop] why kde and gnome's menu situation sucks

2002-10-25 Thread Jeff Waugh
> > In other words, we should be using a unified Debian menu structure with > > appropriate tweaks for certain environments (and in particular, _not_ using > > the default Gnome/KDE menu structures). > > Yup. No... The point behind the vFolder spec is that both GNOME and KDE can show all of t

Re: [desktop] why kde and gnome's menu situation sucks

2002-10-24 Thread Luke Seubert
On 10/24/2002 10:42 PM, Miles Bader at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Luke Seubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I am not quite sure what you mean. I don't think the whole menu >> structure is being based upon any one piddling detail - but I am not sure >> which piddling detail you mean. Please cla

Re: [desktop] why kde and gnome's menu situation sucks

2002-10-24 Thread Luke Seubert
On 10/24/2002 10:26 PM, Tim Wheeler at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > [ On Thursday 24 October 2002 09:18 pm, Luke Seubert wrote: ] >> Good point. This would tend to argue in favor of segregated menus then, >> with GTK apps showing up when one is using the Gnome desktop, and QT apps >> showi

Re: [desktop] why kde and gnome's menu situation sucks

2002-10-24 Thread Miles Bader
Luke Seubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Perhaps DD should _think_ about this issue -- for instance, if it has > > to choose only one terminal program to display in a menu, it should > > make an `environmentally aware' choice (KDE for KDE, Gnome for Gnome, > > Joe's Wackyterm for everybody else

Re: [desktop] why kde and gnome's menu situation sucks

2002-10-24 Thread Tim Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > [ On Thursday 24 October 2002 09:18 pm, Luke Seubert wrote: ] > On 10/24/2002 7:26 PM, Miles Bader at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > [I think that in many case it will be a non-issue because a system will > > only have the main KDE apps install

Re: [desktop] why kde and gnome's menu situation sucks

2002-10-24 Thread Luke Seubert
On 10/24/2002 7:26 PM, Miles Bader at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 05:29:56PM -0400, Luke Seubert wrote: >> However, that does not mean that Debian Desktop should not care. KDE apps >> designed to run optimally under the KDE Desktop environment. Apps run >> better and faste

Re: [desktop] why kde and gnome's menu situation sucks

2002-10-24 Thread Luke Seubert
On 10/24/2002 6:29 PM, Nick Leverton at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm with the "Want to group like tasks with like" camp, myself. But why > not make it an Option[tm] ? Have a configurable bit in the menu program > called "Flatten Debian" or something, which will fold any "/Debian" > menu into t