Re: k4dirstat -- graphical disk usage display with cleanup facilities

2011-09-13 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 04:59:43PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > On 09/13/2011 07:19 AM, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > Ritesh, > > > > You said: > > > > But this functionality is already available in Konqueror. Is > > there anything extra that

k4dirstat -- graphical disk usage display with cleanup facilities

2011-09-12 Thread Steve M. Robbins
Ritesh, You said: But this functionality is already available in Konqueror. Is there anything extra that kdirstat provides? I don't use Konqueror. Can you explain how to produce the sortable tree view of k4dirstat? It wasn't immediately obvious to me. Thanks, -Steve signatu

[s...@debian.org: RFP: k4dirstat -- graphical disk usage display with cleanup facilities]

2011-08-15 Thread Steve M. Robbins
Anyone interested in (re-)packaging kdirstat? - Forwarded message from "Steve M. Robbins" - Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 21:24:30 -0500 From: "Steve M. Robbins" To: Debian Bug Tracking System Subject: RFP: k4dirstat -- graphical disk usage display with cleanup facilities

Desktop Pager woes (KDE 4.2)

2009-04-26 Thread Steve M. Robbins
Hi, Updated to KDE 4.2 about a week ago, which went mostly OK. Previously, however, when I had multiple Desktops configured, the panel would show only the applications running in the current desktop. So if I had 8 desktops, each with an Iceweasel and a Konsole running, the pager would show only t

Re: imlib and libpng

2002-07-19 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 12:25:39AM -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote: > > "Steve M. Robbins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > About the new SONAME for imlib. It would be nice if we had > > cooperation across distributions about this. I've emailed upstream a &

imlib and libpng

2002-07-13 Thread Steve M. Robbins
Hi, Back in January, libpng version 3 was released. This PNG library happens to be linked into several libraries (e.g. imlib and qt2). It is also linked into many applications which also link to imlib or qt2. Such an application will fail if the PNG library version it links with is different tha

Re: [ccheney@cheney.cx: libqt2 libpng2 resolution]

2002-01-09 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 03:21:34AM -0800, Philippe Troin wrote: > Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 10:07:13AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > > > Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit: > > > > > > > > It's only the -dev package, which is only

Re: [ccheney@cheney.cx: libqt2 libpng2 resolution]

2002-01-08 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 11:11:49PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit: > > > > How do you plan to prevent programs that link with libqt2 to also link > > > with libpng3 ? Manual check ? > > > > yes manual check > > > How about libqt2-dev confli

Re: The png fiasco, libqt2, and GNOME

2002-01-06 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 12:43:05PM -0500, steve wrote: > On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 10:46:52PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > > > However, if the rebuilt libqt2 gets into testing before the rebuilt > > > KDE apps, then the latter will suddenly break for everyone using the > > > "testing" distribution.

Re: The png fiasco, libqt2, and GNOME

2002-01-06 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 10:46:52PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Steve M. Robbins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > The reason I'm writing here is that I would like to see the problem > > packages (libqt2 and related kde apps) s

The png fiasco, libqt2, and GNOME

2002-01-06 Thread Steve M. Robbins
Hi, I was just perusing this list archive (I don't subscribe, so CC me if you want me to see any followup) and noticed a message from John Gay quoting me. I had said: By the way, "imlib1" is in the same boat as libqt2: I recompiled imlib using libpng3 and loads of GNOME binaries started

Re: Bug#127252: -unstable compiled against the wrong libpng

2002-01-03 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 09:17:01AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote: > On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 08:06:33PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > > On Wed, 2 Jan 2002 21:36:24 +1100 > > Mark Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > My question still remains. If we require a big recompile, when/ how are > > > we