On Wed, 9 Apr 2003 15:44, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 10:21:43PM -0700, Terry Milnes wrote:
> > Here is the scoop. I added 32 more MBs of memory for the time being until
> > I can go to town and pick up a stick of SDRAM 133. Also, I get an error
> > when trying to chown root.root
Hmm...
I [resume you're aware the ^M characters are actually DOS/Windows carriage
returns? ie CRLF, rather than the unix convention of just LF..
David
'On Wednesday 09 April 2003 23:01, Mika Fischer wrote:
> Hi!
>
> [Keeping this on the list because it has something to do with kmail :)]
>
> S
Hi, David!
On Thursday 10 April 2003 01:29, David Pye wrote:
> I [resume you're aware the ^M characters are actually DOS/Windows
> carriage returns? ie CRLF, rather than the unix convention of just
> LF..
Yes, I know :)
I just can't think of a reason why kmail would put them in there (only
in
Hi!
Small addition...
On Thursday 10 April 2003 00:01, Mika Fischer wrote:
> 1. The behaviour is different between using the MTA via SMTP or via
> /usr/lib/sendmail.
This is wrong. The behaviour is actually the same.
> 3. As if this was not strange enough... here it comes :)
> If I send the mai
Hi!
[Keeping this on the list because it has something to do with kmail :)]
So back to my probblem from the "kmail & cryptplug anyone?" thread...
I ran several tests and this is what I found out:
1. The behaviour is different between using the MTA via SMTP or via
/usr/lib/sendmail. I couldn't
>> As far as I can tell, compiling just KDE for i686 will provide a barely
>> noticeable speed increase. This is because KDE spends a large amount of
>
>A bit off topic but changing from 2.95 to gcc 3.2 has reduced cpu usage in
>many applications on my system by as much as 30%. Particular noticab
On Wednesday 09 April 2003 02:41 pm, Gaute Hvoslef Kvalnes wrote:
> Sun didn't create StarOffice, they bought it from Star Division (a
> German company, I think), who developed it until version 5.2. Since
> then, it has really been made faster, but there's still a long way to
> go. If you compare i
On Wednesday 09 April 2003 19:27, Sean Fraley wrote:
> > Does anyone know if compiling for i686 instead of for i386 would give any
> > speed increase greater than very marginal?
> > Any real-life tests anywhere?
>
> As far as I can tell, compiling just KDE for i686 will provide a barely
> noticeab
On Wed, 9 Apr 2003 18:06:06 +0200
Børre Gaup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> > Marc
> Can it be some virus cleaning program at the ISP that's causing this
> behaviour?
>
Hello Børre
I also had the idea that sth. is wrong with that ISP's SMTP, but then I
tried to send from my machine using k
Aryan Ameri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> There was a time, when Sun was known for producing fast, secure and
> stable code. e.g back in mid 90s, everyone (even their competitors)
> agreed that Solaris was the best *nix ever. When in 2000 they
> announced their plan for staroffice/openoffice.Bor
On Wednesday 09 April 2003 18:19, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> I read that but it does not explain why the other method is 3-4 times (!)
> slower. Especially, because the sockets in /tmp/.ICE-unix are owned by me!
> So there must be an if-then-else code somewhere that causes this behaviour.
> I'm not s
On Wednesday 09 April 2003 16:46, Aryan Ameri wrote:
> > Yes... bad design, bloat, redundant code, all the horrors in one...
> > We use it at home because of the good support for MS office formats
> > though.
>
> Yup, actually OOo is the worst software, which I *have* to use everyday.
> Only for t
On Wednesday 09 April 2003 02:58 am, Karolina Lindqvist wrote:
> Does anyone know if compiling for i686 instead of for i386 would give any
> speed increase greater than very marginal?
> Any real-life tests anywhere?
As far as I can tell, compiling just KDE for i686 will provide a barely
noticeabl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Mittwoch, 9. April 2003 07:44 schrieb Daniel Stone:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 10:21:43PM -0700, Terry Milnes wrote:
> > Here is the scoop. I added 32 more MBs of memory for the time being until
> > I can go to town and pick up a stick of SDRAM 133.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Mittwoch, 9. April 2003 07:16 schrieb Terry Milnes:
> Does anyone have the same problem? If so, how do I fix it?
I simply edited the adress bar and added the three tab-specific icons (there
are three) on the most right of it. This way, they are al
On Wednesday 09 April 2003 13:03, Frank Van Damme wrote:
> > It's pretty simple - there's even a HOWTO around.
> Url?
Could be: http://dforce.sh.cvut.cz/~seli/download/tips.html
Cheers,
Mika
pgpvUidZtKby0.pgp
Description: signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Mittwoch, 9. April 2003 03:34 schrieb Daniel Stone:
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 03:11:31AM +0200, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> > I just tried the
> > chown root.root /tmp/.ICE-unix
> > /etc/init.d/kdm restart
> > and it really kicks it. Increadibl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Mittwoch, 9. April 2003 08:11 schrieb Matt Sheffield:
> That method has improved performance for me. However by default, Debian
> deletes the contents of the /tmp directory on reboot. Thus, the .ICE-unix
> and all of the mcop and dcop directories ne
Gaskavahkku, cuoÅomÃnu 9. b. 2003 10.25, Marc Tinnemeyer don ÄÃllet:
> On Wed, 9 Apr 2003 09:34:45 +0200
>
> Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Works fine here. I guess it's probably some bad interaction between
> > kmail and the outgoing mail transport. What outgoi
On Wednesday 09 April 2003 15:23, Frank Van Damme wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 April 2003 13:26, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > OOo is also ridiculous. It should share nore with the other
> > > available open source software - such as widgets. I'd be
> > > delighted to save my files with those gorgeous QT
On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 09:19:28PM +0800, Cameron Patrick wrote:
> I've seen this problem before a few times, too. It applies to any
> landscape PDF file, and affects Ghostview as well as KGhostview and the
> Konqueror PDF plugin too.
>
> In fact I bumped into it this afternoon looking at uni cou
On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 02:23:07PM +0200, Frank Van Damme wrote:
| > > KGhostview is still buggy. The first pdf my dad tried to open with it
| > > showed up sideways, off course the rest of the page in place. Grmbl...
| >
| > Did you report a bug? :)
|
| IIRC, the data was confidential.
I've see
On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 02:23:07PM +0200, Frank Van Damme wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 April 2003 13:26, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Well, I'm talking Australian dollars. There was a reason why I still had
> > the PII when I *maintained* KDE.
>
> Ugh... Must be painful to compile c++ code on such a box.
On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 02:21:06PM +0200, Frank Van Damme wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 April 2003 13:31, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Um, I'm not a "hardware is so cheap today" guy. I've spent most of the
> > thread pointing out why saying "hardware's cheap, go buy it" is a
> > ridiculous assertion.
>
> Wa
On Wednesday 09 April 2003 13:26, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 01:03:38PM +0200, Frank Van Damme wrote:
> > On Wednesday 09 April 2003 11:56, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > Maybe in, say, DDR.
> >
> > 256 megs ddr = 80 euro. Reason my box has 256 meg :) I'll upgrade once I
> > have a ga
On Wednesday 09 April 2003 13:31, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Um, I'm not a "hardware is so cheap today" guy. I've spent most of the
> thread pointing out why saying "hardware's cheap, go buy it" is a
> ridiculous assertion.
Was still pointing at KL...
> > Yes I am talking about EDO ram of course! eve
On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 12:15:13PM +0200, Frank Van Damme wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 April 2003 09:22, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Umm, it's still about $au60-80; people often don't have that money to
> > spare. My AthlonXP 2400+ is a direct upgrade from the PII 350, which I
> > had for ages.
>
> Oh gos
On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 01:03:38PM +0200, Frank Van Damme wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 April 2003 11:56, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Maybe in, say, DDR.
>
> 256 megs ddr = 80 euro. Reason my box has 256 meg :) I'll upgrade once I have
> a game that needs more for textures.
Well, I'm talking Australian d
On Wednesday 09 April 2003 11:56, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 11:10:05AM +0200, Karolina Lindqvist wrote:
> > onsdagen den 9 april 2003 09.22 skrev Daniel Stone:
> > > Not to mention 64mb.
> >
> > Well, where I live, 128MB appears to be the smallest size sold in common
> > shops.
On Wednesday 09 April 2003 09:22, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 08:50:29AM +0200, Karolina Lindqvist wrote:
> > onsdagen den 9 april 2003 07.44 skrev Daniel Stone:
> > > 256mb of RAM is an irresponsible figure
> > > to be bandying around.
> >
> > Memory chips often comes in 128MB i
On Wednesday 09 April 2003 07:19, Karolina Lindqvist wrote:
> Which is why I say that for practical purposes, it appears that 256MB is a
> reasonable amount of RAM, in my opinion. Unless you run just only kmail +
> one instance of konqueror and noth more. Then 128MB might be allright.
> Which does
On Wednesday 09 April 2003 10:10, Ralf Nolden wrote:
> dpkg --purge --force-all kalarmd libkcal2
> apt-get -f install
Thanks for the advice but I had to purge libkgantt0, too:
Unpacking kdepim-libs (from .../kdepim-libs_4%3a3.1.1-0woody1_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archiv
On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 11:10:05AM +0200, Karolina Lindqvist wrote:
> onsdagen den 9 april 2003 09.22 skrev Daniel Stone:
> > Not to mention 64mb.
>
> Well, where I live, 128MB appears to be the smallest size sold in common
> shops.
Maybe in, say, DDR.
> > The point is that your figures of 256m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi there,
I have an interesting bug here: I move one of my icons on my KDE 3.1.1(Sid)
Desktop to another position, click somewhere so that the icon lose it's
focus, move the mouse back over the icon and my X completly hangs (sometimes
I have to do
Mika,
I am using a couple of scripts called from the startkde script, as there
doesn't seem to be a way to call scripts on session shutdown (that I know
of). I have attached the gpgagent shutdown script I use. It just reads the
process ID from the GPG_AGENT_INFO environment variable, and kills
onsdagen den 9 april 2003 09.22 skrev Daniel Stone:
> Not to mention 64mb.
Well, where I live, 128MB appears to be the smallest size sold in common
shops.
> The point is that your figures of 256mb are extremely irresponsible,
> considering users respect you somewhat for your packaging, and I'd
On Wed, 9 Apr 2003 09:34:45 +0200
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Works fine here. I guess it's probably some bad interaction between
> kmail and the outgoing mail transport. What outgoing mail transport
> are you using? If you use the local sendmail, you should
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 08 April 2003 22:45, Max Moritz Sievers wrote:
> Hello,
> I tried to update from KDE 3.1 to 3.1.1 on Woody.
> There are errors with the packages kdepim-libs and kalarm.
>
> Here is the output of dselect:
dpkg --purge --force-all kalarmd lib
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 09 April 2003 07:37, Wolfgang Mader wrote:
> hello,
>
> if i shut down my computer i there are allways some songs in the playlist
> of noatun but the partition on which this songs are stored is not monted on
> start up. Noatun now tries to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Stone wrote:
|> I have edited /etc/init.d/bootmisc.sh I haven't rebooted yet, so I
|> don't know if it works.
|
| Probably, but you're not getting rid of any stale files inside of
| .ICE-unix. :)
True. I could discard that and instead do the foll
On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 09:09:54AM +0200, S?ren Friis-Nielsen wrote:
> I have edited /etc/init.d/bootmisc.sh
> About 40 lines down I added a line:
>
> ( cd /tmp && \
> ~ find . -xdev \
> ~ $TEXPR \
> ~ ! -name . \
> ~ ! \( -name lost+found -uid 0 \) \
> ~ ! \( -name quota.user -uid 0 \) \
> ~
On Tuesday 08 April 2003 19:37, Marc Tinnemeyer wrote:
> So my question is, has anybody here every experienced sth. like that, or
> is there a way to check what kmail is doing with CC and BCC ?
Works fine here. I guess it's probably some bad interaction between kmail and
the outgoing mail trans
On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 08:22:51AM +0200, Karolina Lindqvist wrote:
> The whole discussion was how much RAM is needed, and in my opinion, 128MB is
> too little. It works, but causes a lot of swapping with normal things like
> web browsing etc. The best and cheapest speed up for a 128MB system is
On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 08:50:29AM +0200, Karolina Lindqvist wrote:
> onsdagen den 9 april 2003 07.44 skrev Daniel Stone:
> > 256mb of RAM is an irresponsible figure
> > to be bandying around.
>
> Memory chips often comes in 128MB increments, don't they?
Not to mention 64mb.
> So the choice is
On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 08:34:43AM +0200, Karolina Lindqvist wrote:
> That might be. Which program is a good presentation tool? Some that
> graphically shows me what all the RAM is used for.
> I use it to get an approximate picture of what is going on. The individual
> numbers are not important,
On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 02:11:27AM -0400, Matt Sheffield wrote:
> That method has improved performance for me. However by default, Debian
> deletes the contents of the /tmp directory on reboot. Thus, the .ICE-unix and
> all of the mcop and dcop directories need to be recreated each time you start
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matt Sheffield wrote:
| That method has improved performance for me. However by default, Debian
| deletes the contents of the /tmp directory on reboot. Thus, the
.ICE-unix and
| all of the mcop and dcop directories need to be recreated each time
you sta
On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 08:22:51AM +0200, Karolina Lindqvist wrote:
> The normal web browsers appears to be pretty bad, when it comes to memory.
> Just starting netscape/mozilla, will eat 75MB of RAM. Each instance of
> konqueror takes around 10MB extra. They also causes X to allocate more
> mem
Does anyone know if compiling for i686 instead of for i386 would give any
speed increase greater than very marginal?
Any real-life tests anywhere?
On Wed, 9 Apr 2003 04:11 pm, Matt Sheffield wrote:
> That method has improved performance for me. However by default, Debian
> deletes the contents of the /tmp directory on reboot. Thus, the .ICE-unix
> ...
> time. I'd like to disable /tmp clearing and clean things up myself. How
> does one go abou
onsdagen den 9 april 2003 07.44 skrev Daniel Stone:
> 256mb of RAM is an irresponsible figure
> to be bandying around.
Memory chips often comes in 128MB increments, don't they?
So the choice is between 128 or 256. My recommendation is to get that 256. The
cost is not great nowadays. 128Mb is abo
onsdagen den 9 april 2003 00.25 skrev Andreas Pakulat:
> What are you all doing? kdeinit has 58Megs here, running. And I don't
> think that gmemusage is a good presentation tool, it shows me that:
> xmms(178XXXK) + galeon-bin(218232K) + python2.1(144408K) = 540 Megs.
> Which is what I got totally
On Wednesday 09 April 2003 03:34, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > I just tried the
> > chown root.root /tmp/.ICE-unix
> > /etc/init.d/kdm restart
> > and it really kicks it. Increadible but this this reduces the KDE startup
> > time to 1/3. Maybe there are other tweaks. I will go on trying, maybe
onsdagen den 9 april 2003 00.32 skrev kosh:
> X memory usage is evil black magic to figure out.
> It also includes AGP mapped memory, pixmaps and stuff that programs have
> open get charged to X and damned if I know how much other stuff it has. At
> one point I had X showing it was using 1G of ram
You could not find the options in KControl|Regional & Accessibility|Keyboard
Shortcuts?
On Tuesday, April 8, 2003 2:24 am, Neven Rodinis wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2003 at 08:27:29AM -0700, Matt Sheffield wrote:
> > Are you trying to access the shortcuts from the Preferences menu? If
> > so, you wo
That method has improved performance for me. However by default, Debian
deletes the contents of the /tmp directory on reboot. Thus, the .ICE-unix and
all of the mcop and dcop directories need to be recreated each time you start
your machine up from scratch. But once these things have been set up
On Wednesday 09 April 2003 00:32, kosh wrote:
> X memory usage is evil black magic to figure out.
X is evil! Use fresco! - http://www.fresco.org
--
This email was generated using KMail from KDE 3.1 on Debian GNU/Linux
On Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 10:21:43PM -0700, Terry Milnes wrote:
> Here is the scoop. I added 32 more MBs of memory for the time being until I
> can go to town and pick up a stick of SDRAM 133. Also, I get an error when
> trying to chown root.root /tmp/.ICE-unix. It says something about no such
> dire
On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 07:19:06AM +0200, Karolina Lindqvist wrote:
> onsdagen den 9 april 2003 01.18 skrev Daniel Stone:
> > I thought you'd know that saying how much memory kdeinit takes is
> > *utterly* *useless*. Obviously not.
>
> It is not useless, as it says how much RAM is taken by KDE + s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hello,
if i shut down my computer i there are allways some songs in the playlist of
noatun but the partition on which this songs are stored is not monted on
start up. Noatun now tries to play this songs and in the taskbar there apears
the hint stop
Here is the scoop. I added 32 more MBs of memory for the time being until I
can go to town and pick up a stick of SDRAM 133. Also, I get an error when
trying to chown root.root /tmp/.ICE-unix. It says something about no such
directory. I added the hack to the xfree86-common initscript. Could this b
onsdagen den 9 april 2003 01.18 skrev Daniel Stone:
> I thought you'd know that saying how much memory kdeinit takes is
> *utterly* *useless*. Obviously not.
It is not useless, as it says how much RAM is taken by KDE + some of the
applications. gmemusage just can't give a more find graded approa
Does anyone have the same problem? If so, how do I
fix it?
NeoFax
63 matches
Mail list logo