On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 05:29:24PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote:
> Alan Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I know that is what is happening - what nobody has answered completely yet
> > is
> > WHY you can't put 2.95 compiled packages in to unstable at first and then
> > follow up later with 3
Alan Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Saturday 19 October 2002 4:48 pm, Noel Koethe wrote:
>
>>
>> We will still wait for the gcc 3.2 transition for unstable.
>
> I know that is what is happening - what nobody has answered completely yet is
> WHY you can't put 2.95 compiled packages in t
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 04:24:59PM +0200, Noel Koethe wrote:
> Does anybody see any problems if we will start with kde 3.1x builds/
> uploads for experimental?
A very good start and something that could happen within hours would be
for Karolina or a DD sponser to modify the Debian changelog for he
On Sat, 19 Oct 2002, Noel Koethe wrote:
> On Sam, 19 Okt 2002, Todd Charron wrote:
>
> > There seems to be a lot of back and forth here about what's happening
> > with the GCC 3.2 migration and getting KDE into unstable. Is there
> > anywhere that we can check the status of the migration and see
On Sat, 19 Oct 2002, John Schmidt wrote:
> I compiled the kde 3.0.4 for my powerpc box based on Ralph Nolden's
> source files on the kde.org site. I installed them using dpkg -i *.deb
> selecting the debs I wanted. Now when I go and use aptitude to update
> my testing box, I get messages indicat
Ouch, if has yet to even begin would it make sense to perhaps have a gcc
2.95 3.0.4 and wait for 3.2 for kde 3.1?
Todd
On Sat, 2002-10-19 at 17:51, Noel Koethe wrote:
> On Sam, 19 Okt 2002, Todd Charron wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> > There seems to be a lot of back and forth here about what's happeni
On Sam, 19 Okt 2002, Todd Charron wrote:
Hello,
> There seems to be a lot of back and forth here about what's happening
> with the GCC 3.2 migration and getting KDE into unstable. Is there
> anywhere that we can check the status of the migration and see what
> still needs to be done? (something
There seems to be a lot of back and forth here about what's happening
with the GCC 3.2 migration and getting KDE into unstable. Is there
anywhere that we can check the status of the migration and see what
still needs to be done? (something similar to the KDE faq, but for the
GCC migration perhaps
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 19 October 2002 4:48 pm, Noel Koethe wrote:
>
> We will still wait for the gcc 3.2 transition for unstable.
I know that is what is happening - what nobody has answered completely yet is
WHY you can't put 2.95 compiled packages in to unst
Hi,
I compiled the kde 3.0.4 for my powerpc box based on Ralph Nolden's
source files on the kde.org site. I installed them using dpkg -i *.deb
selecting the debs I wanted. Now when I go and use aptitude to update
my testing box, I get messages indicating that the kde files I just
installed a
On Saturday 19 October 2002 16:24, Noel Koethe wrote:
> Does anybody see any problems if we will start with kde 3.1x builds/
> uploads for experimental?
I'm very much in favor of this.
Not all KDE packages in Debian are maintained by the Debian KDE maintainers
(in fact, only a minority of them is
On Son, 20 Okt 2002, Mark Purcell wrote:
> > Does anybody see any problems if we will start with kde 3.1x builds/
> > uploads for experimental?
>
> That would be excellent if you would do that and quite suitable to
> upload the kde3.1x builds into unstable.
>
> It would also allow me to upload t
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 04:24:59PM +0200, Noel Koethe wrote:
> Does anybody see any problems if we will start with kde 3.1x builds/
> uploads for experimental?
That would be excellent if you would do that and quite suitable to
upload the kde3.1x builds into unstable.
It would also allow me to upl
On Sam, 19 Okt 2002, Martin Schulze wrote:
Hello,
I have to fully agree that it makes alot of sense if we use
experimental for kde3 stuff. We have lost alot of time since
kde3 released in which we could fix our packages and could
work on packages which base on kde3.
> > Yes, something like this.
| When I click on links to text files, Konqueror complains that "There
appears
| to be a configuration error. You have associated Konqueror with the
| text/plain but it cannot handle this filetype."
must be some error in the debs. It didn't happen with selfcompiled beta2.
Andreas
When I click on links to text files, Konqueror complains that "There appears
to be a configuration error. You have associated Konqueror with the
text/plain but it cannot handle this filetype."
Is this a price of living on the unstable KDE 3.1b2 tree?
--
Comments and information are appreciated
ReMoin!
Ralf Nolden wrote:
> > Ralf Nolden wrote:
> > > well, as much as this would work out, someone has to do the work
> > > actually. And regarding the experimental distribution - that brings your
> > > work environment to a highly unstable state, not to speak about the
> > > packagers having t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 19 October 2002 10:39, Martin Schulze wrote:
Moin Joey,
> Moin Ralf!
>
> Ralf Nolden wrote:
> > well, as much as this would work out, someone has to do the work
> > actually. And regarding the experimental distribution - that brings your
Moin Ralf!
Ralf Nolden wrote:
> well, as much as this would work out, someone has to do the work actually.
> And
> regarding the experimental distribution - that brings your work environment
> to a highly unstable state, not to speak about the packagers having to build
> the packages on this s
Andy Saxena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 12:13:58AM +0200, Michael Stucki wrote:
>>
>> Have a look at Mindterm which runs as a Java Applet on your favourite
>> Web-Server! :-)
>>
>
> Nice, but not open source :-}, but really nice!
The version in Debian is GPL, though n
20 matches
Mail list logo
