I'm trying to set up Japanese localization on my Debian system for a couple
of Japanese students who are staying with me and I can't get it to work. The
last time I did it I just selected kde-i18n-ja and select Japanese for
country and language and jisx0208.1983-0 for the font. What I get is eit
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 04:02:09PM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Great! Once you finish the patch let me know and I will see about
> > getting it incorporated upstream, unless you already know someone to
> > send it to.
>
> That might take a while,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Mittwoch, 31. Juli 2002 01:08 schrieb Daniel Schepler:
> Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Am Dienstag, 30. Juli 2002 02:24 schrieb Daniel Schepler:
> > > Something has been bothering me about the KDE packages... The OpenSSL
> > > lic
No it is the problem of OpenSSL license for being obnoxious ;)
Chris
Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Great! Once you finish the patch let me know and I will see about
> getting it incorporated upstream, unless you already know someone to
> send it to.
That might take a while, since I know nothing about how to program for
openssl or gnutls, or how the cu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Mittwoch, 31. Juli 2002 01:00 schrieb Chris Cheney:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 12:56:49AM +0200, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 30. Juli 2002 02:24 schrieb Daniel Schepler:
> > > Something has been bothering me about the KDE packages... The
Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am Dienstag, 30. Juli 2002 02:24 schrieb Daniel Schepler:
> > Something has been bothering me about the KDE packages... The OpenSSL
> > license is incompatible with the GPL, but Konqueror et al use the
>
> Can you actually tell me, where it is incomp
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 12:56:49AM +0200, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Am Dienstag, 30. Juli 2002 02:24 schrieb Daniel Schepler:
> > Something has been bothering me about the KDE packages... The OpenSSL
> > license is incompatible with the GPL, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Dienstag, 30. Juli 2002 02:24 schrieb Daniel Schepler:
> Something has been bothering me about the KDE packages... The OpenSSL
> license is incompatible with the GPL, but Konqueror et al use the
Can you actually tell me, where it is incompatible?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
> I know I've seen this discussed before but I couldn't find it in the
> archives. I have these lines in my .bash_profile:
>
> if [ -d ~/bin ] ; then
> PATH=~/bin:"${PATH}"
> fi
>
> When I login on the console it behaves as expe
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 03:36:33PM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Is gnutls lgpl yet? Otherwise, I am pretty certain KDE upstream will
> > refuse a gnutls patch. If it is lgpl it shouldn't be too hard to
> > convince them to take the patch.
> >
> >
Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is gnutls lgpl yet? Otherwise, I am pretty certain KDE upstream will
> refuse a gnutls patch. If it is lgpl it shouldn't be too hard to
> convince them to take the patch.
>
> Chris
According to the debian copyright file, the main gnutls library is
LGPL,
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 12:30:21AM +0200, Maximilian Reiss wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 31. Juli 2002 00:23 schrieb Chris Cheney:
> > On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 02:38:42PM +0200, Maximilian Reiss wrote:
> > > No gpl violation. KDE does _not_ link against libssl.
> > >
> > > Max
> >
> > Oh yes it does... H
Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 02:38:42PM +0200, Maximilian Reiss wrote:
> > No gpl violation. KDE does _not_ link against libssl.
> >
> > Max
>
> Oh yes it does... However, the parts of KDE that do link to libssl in
> 3.x are now lgpl'd so the issue shou
Am Mittwoch, 31. Juli 2002 00:23 schrieb Chris Cheney:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 02:38:42PM +0200, Maximilian Reiss wrote:
> > No gpl violation. KDE does _not_ link against libssl.
> >
> > Max
>
> Oh yes it does... However, the parts of KDE that do link to libssl in
> 3.x are now lgpl'd so the
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 03:26:56PM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
-snip-
> reinstated by the authors of the code involved.) So I'd prefer to
> approach them with something like "here's a patch which allows KDE to
> use gnutls instead of libssl, which resolves license
> incompatibilities." I'd susp
Achim Bohnet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> No https? No spop? No imaps? No sftp? NO. If really necessary,
> ask upstream to resolve the conflict. Don't make Debian KDE not useable
> before trying to find a real fix upstream.
>
> Please don't 'solve' the conflict on the should
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 02:38:42PM +0200, Maximilian Reiss wrote:
> No gpl violation. KDE does _not_ link against libssl.
>
> Max
Oh yes it does... However, the parts of KDE that do link to libssl in
3.x are now lgpl'd so the issue should not matter (I think)?
Chris
Why are you sending these strange messages to the list?
Chris
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 02:32:10PM -0400, Craig Morehouse wrote:
> LIST-DAEMON COMMAND {{ DIGEST MODE FLAG TRUE TOGGLE }} STOP END
> --
> Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional
> to how much we think we
Maximilian Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am Dienstag, 30. Juli 2002 02:24 schrieb Daniel Schepler:
> > Something has been bothering me about the KDE packages... The OpenSSL
> > license is incompatible with the GPL, but Konqueror et al use the
> > library. I just checked and, indeed, I foun
Hello all,
apologies if this has already been handled in the archives (though I was
unable to find anything related to it in there). I recently upgraded to kde
3.02 using the standard debs and am running into trouble with extremely long
startup times for some kde applications. The most obviou
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 12:18:19PM -0700, Joseph Carter wrote:
>
> You must not read -devel then... There has been no shortage of discussion
> on that list about the problem and (disturbingly enough) there seems to be
> some progress toward a resolution even!
Doh! Didn't notice it. Thanks.
Jo
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 09:33:56AM -0400, John Bazik wrote:
> > For the moment, until all this gets straightened out, I guess you could
>
> Is someone working to straighten it out? I couldn't find any discussion
> of it. The only fixes I've heard suggested are for the upstream author to
> rename
LIST-DAEMON COMMAND {{ DIGEST MODE FLAG TRUE TOGGLE }} STOP END
--
Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional
to how much we think we know.
Set the controls for the heart of the sun.
Hi,
I recently installed unofficial KDE 3.0.2. I found out later that there is no
CD burning software anymore. I used to use kreatecd but that has, as I
understand it, been replaced by koncd for KDE 3.0.x.
Koncd is part of the official kde-multimedia sources but there is no koncd
.deb. Is t
On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 01:03:42PM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote:
> For the moment, until all this gets straightened out, I guess you could
Is someone working to straighten it out? I couldn't find any discussion
of it. The only fixes I've heard suggested are for the upstream author to
rename libpng
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 02:38:42PM +0200, Maximilian Reiss wrote:
> No gpl violation. KDE does _not_ link against libssl.
kdebase-crypto depends on libssl because libkcm_crypto is linked against
libssl.
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
--
To UNSUBSC
Am Dienstag, 30. Juli 2002 02:24 schrieb Daniel Schepler:
> Something has been bothering me about the KDE packages... The OpenSSL
> license is incompatible with the GPL, but Konqueror et al use the
> library. I just checked and, indeed, I found that libssl.so.0.9.6 and
> libqt-mt.so.3.0.4 are lin
On Tuesday 30 July 2002 02:24, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Something has been bothering me about the KDE packages... The OpenSSL
> license is incompatible with the GPL, but Konqueror et al use the
> library. I just checked and, indeed, I found that libssl.so.0.9.6 and
> libqt-mt.so.3.0.4 are linked
29 matches
Mail list logo
