On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 03:36:33PM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote: > Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Is gnutls lgpl yet? Otherwise, I am pretty certain KDE upstream will > > refuse a gnutls patch. If it is lgpl it shouldn't be too hard to > > convince them to take the patch. > > > > Chris > > According to the debian copyright file, the main gnutls library is > LGPL, while the parts in gnutls-extra (which shouldn't be needed for > https, etc support) are GPL.
Great! Once you finish the patch let me know and I will see about getting it incorporated upstream, unless you already know someone to send it to. Thanks, Chris
