On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 09:47:37PM +0200, Karolina Lindqvist wrote:
> fredagen den 3 maj 2002 19.30 skrev Ross Boylan:
>
> > My understanding from earlier discussion on this list is that although
> > the upstream has a debian directory, it is not necessarily current.
> > The maintainer for some of
> I've been toying with the 'best' method of compiling KDE3 on woody lately,
> and in the interests of lazyness I'm wondering whether it's a good idea to
> use woodys qt3 packages.
It's quite easy to compile on woody.
> Everything (almost) has compiled fine using those, seems very stable. If I
>
fredagen den 3 maj 2002 20.22 skrev Dan Slatford:
> There was one niggle taking this shortcut, kdegraphics won't compile. It
> requires imlib, imlib requires an older version libpng whose -dev package
> conflicts with the libpng-dev package that qt3 wants, in short imlib and
> qt3 dev files won't
fredagen den 3 maj 2002 19.30 skrev Ross Boylan:
> My understanding from earlier discussion on this list is that although
> the upstream has a debian directory, it is not necessarily current.
> The maintainer for some of the packages said he was using upstream,
> but his packages do not include th
Hi all,
I've been toying with the 'best' method of compiling KDE3 on woody lately,
and in the interests of lazyness I'm wondering whether it's a good idea to
use woodys qt3 packages.
Everything (almost) has compiled fine using those, seems very stable. If I
were to have compiled qt3 myself though
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 03 May 2002 6:30 pm, Ross Boylan wrote:
> My understanding from earlier discussion on this list is that although
> the upstream has a debian directory, it is not necessarily current.
> The maintainer for some of the packages said he was usin
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 09:01:58AM +0100, Chris Howells wrote:
> On Friday 03 May 2002 6:56 am, Ross Boylan wrote:
>
> > Would trying to apply the diff's from Debian (official or not) to the
> > head of the kde.org tree be a good idea or not?
>
> The debian/ build directory is already in upstream
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 10:06:37AM +0100, Giles Constant wrote:
> On Thu, 2 May 2002, Stephan Jaensch wrote:
>
> > You didn't compile PAM support in.
>
> ah... that might be it :-)
>
alternatively you could just make sure kcheckpass has read access to
/etc/shadow, that is, make it setuid ro
That worked.. ta :-)
On Fri, 3 May 2002, I wrote:
> On Thu, 2 May 2002, Stephan Jaensch wrote:
>
> > You didn't compile PAM support in. Make sure you have libpam0g-dev installed
> > and reconfigure kdebase. Make sure that it found PAM support, make, make
> > install and be happy. :-)
>
> ah.
가브리엘향수
파운데이션
총알청바지
\25,000
\39,000
\31,500
허락 없이 메일을 보내드려 죄송합니다.
원치 않으시면 옆의 버튼을 눌러주세요.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2 May 2002, Stephan Jaensch wrote:
> You didn't compile PAM support in. Make sure you have libpam0g-dev installed
> and reconfigure kdebase. Make sure that it found PAM support, make, make
> install and be happy. :-)
ah... that might be it :-) (although hitting the 'administrator
mo
On Friday 03 May 2002 6:56 am, Ross Boylan wrote:
> Would trying to apply the diff's from Debian (official or not) to the
> head of the kde.org tree be a good idea or not?
The debian/ build directory is already in upstream. I've no idea what the
other patches are for...
> Is there any particula
I'm considering building KDE3, and just got a bunch of it from CVS at
kde.org. I did this partly because the unofficial debs were debs
only, no sources that I saw (at
http://www.geniussystems.net/KDE3%20Experimental/).
So I have a couple of questions.
Where are the current debian sources for KDE
13 matches
Mail list logo
