> I've been toying with the 'best' method of compiling KDE3 on woody lately, > and in the interests of lazyness I'm wondering whether it's a good idea to > use woodys qt3 packages.
It's quite easy to compile on woody. > Everything (almost) has compiled fine using those, seems very stable. If I > were to have compiled qt3 myself though, could I expect any noticable leaps > in performance? Any qt specific optimizations I could/should use? I don't know. > There was one niggle taking this shortcut, kdegraphics won't compile. It > requires imlib, imlib requires an older version libpng whose -dev package > conflicts with the libpng-dev package that qt3 wants, in short imlib and qt3 > dev files won't coexist, I can't compile kdegraphics. Should I just forget > about this and start over with a custom built qt3 perhaps like I should have > done the first time around? Yes. Fred -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
