> On Sat, 26 May 2001 00:28:59 +0200, Hendrik Sattler
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Hendrik> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hendrik> Hash: SHA1
Hendrik> On Saturday, 26. May 2001 00:22, Debian User wrote:
>> I'm using KMail to read most of my mail. Somewhere along the way I
>> got gnu
Am getting mails from here in response to mail sent to debian-user &
debian-kde lists.
HTH & good luck
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: User Quota Exceeded
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 23:48:53 +0200
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fatal Err
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, 26. May 2001 00:22, Debian User wrote:
> I'm using KMail to read most of my mail. Somewhere along the way I
> got gnupg installed and now I get a line which reads "Message was
> signed by unknown key ID XXX". So, how do I get the suppo
I'm using KMail to read most of my mail. Somewhere along the way I
got gnupg installed and now I get a line which reads "Message was
signed by unknown key ID XXX". So, how do I get the supposedly
"unknown key" recognized?
P.S. GPG is greek to me.
G. L. `Griz' Inabnit wrote:
> After reading this, I GASPED!! Now I'm not only feeling foolish,
> I've likely screwed some people up!! Where is the best mirror list
> now, Ivan? (I got too damn spoiled by TDYC :-=) )
Mirror in
http://ftp.linux.ee/pub/kde.tdyc.com/ or
ftp://ftp.linux.ee/pub
Greets,
I wanted to thank those that responded. The advice was very useful and I am
now able to navigate the lists effectively. I don't see a batching option, or
thread delete on kmail - yet. But Now I just read thru the thread and
select it and use the 'd' key. Very nice.
thanks again.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Friday 25 May 2001 14:14, Ivan E. Moore II wrote something to this effect:
> > The debian kde2 stable archive can be found on sourceforge. Here's the
> > link:
> >
> >
> > http://ftp.sourceforge.net/pub/mirrors/kde/stable/latest/distribution/deb
> >/
>
> o
On Fri, 25 May 2001, Ben Burton wrote:
>
>> Is it generally possible (I know this is possible with sawfish) for the
>> user to install a theme without root privileges? If so, then one big theme
>> package is useful to allow a user to browse themes, select the one(s) they
>> like, and copy it/them
> The debian kde2 stable archive can be found on sourceforge. Here's the link:
>
>
> http://ftp.sourceforge.net/pub/mirrors/kde/stable/latest/distribution/deb/
o don't point anyone there...that stuff is so old and out of
date it's scary.
Ivan
--
Ivan E. M
where can i find libssl 0.9.6 for potato? this package is showing as a
failed dependency when tryin to install KDE 2.1.1 on potato.
scott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Friday 25 May 2001 05:30, Frank Zimmermann wrote something to this effect:
> Giacomo Mulas wrote:
> > Hello, I browsed through the list archives (I am not
> > subscribed) first, but I could not find any mention about this: are there
> > any persistent
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Friday 25 May 2001 00:55, Ben Burton wrote something to this effect:
> > Is it generally possible (I know this is possible with sawfish) for the
> > user to install a theme without root privileges? If so, then one big
> > theme package is useful to allow a us
Giacomo Mulas wrote:
Hello, I browsed through the list archives (I am not
subscribed) first, but I could not find any mention about this: are there
any persistent problems with the kde packages for potato that used to be
available at kde.tdyc.com? Apparently, only some of the authoritative
On Fri, 25 May 2001, Rob Walker wrote:
> It would be nice if there were a suid root, but user-runnable, theme
> installer which would install over the Network or from a local tarball
> of themes. That way a user could install the themes which he wanted,
> they would go in system space, and the oth
On Fri, 25 May 2001, Ben Burton wrote:
> > Although best would be a KDE-theme installer. Are the themes
> > available individually anywhere, in a format consistent enough for
> > automating the debianization and installation?
>
> By this do you mean an empty debian package whose configuration proc
> On Fri, 25 May 2001 03:44:46 -0400, Matt Zimmerman
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> > Ben> I am hesitant to do (1) because of the user's disk space usage.
>> > Ben> I am hesitant to do (2) because I'm not sure that debian wants a
>> > Ben> million kde-theme-* packages on its servers.
Mat
> On Fri, 25 May 2001 15:07:46 +0200, Casper Gielen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Casper> The only disadvantage I can think of is that when a new
Casper> section is added apt/dselect won't know about it until it's
Casper> added to sources.list . I've made up two solutions to this but
What
On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 03:57:02PM +0200, andrea gelmini wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 03:07:46PM +0200, Casper Gielen wrote:
> > No, but those packages need to be parsed and checked for dependencies by
> > pkg etc... This takes lots of cycles and lots of RAM on _all_ machines,
> > regardless of
On Fri, 25 May 2001 15:26:38 +0200
Casper Gielen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 11:44:14AM +0200, Viktor Rosenfeld wrote:
> >
> > Don't tell me, that you absolutely have to install Debian on a 386. No
> > one has to do that, you can always use a bigger machine for the initi
On Thursday, 24. May 2001 03:30, Tim Everding wrote:
> Its not a kernel problem. Sound works fine outside KDE (like in gnome). But
> sound will only work in KDE if I manually start artsd.
>
> I also get an error under KDE control center if I select "Look &
> Feel"->"System Notifications". Again, K
On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 03:07:46PM +0200, Casper Gielen wrote:
> No, but those packages need to be parsed and checked for dependencies by
> pkg etc... This takes lots of cycles and lots of RAM on _all_ machines,
> regardless of wether those packages are actually installed. Using
i see, but the con
On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 11:44:14AM +0200, Viktor Rosenfeld wrote:
>
> Don't tell me, that you absolutely have to install Debian on a 386. No
> one has to do that, you can always use a bigger machine for the initial
> setup. Hell, back in the "old days" people were suggesting to compile
> the ker
On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 11:39:23AM +0200, andrea gelmini wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 10:32:41AM +0200, Michael Neuffer wrote:
>
> > There are more then enough machines around that already have
> > problems with the package management. Machines that must run
> > with 16 or maybe 8 MB of memo
Giacomo Mulas wrote:
>
> Hello, I browsed through the list archives (I am not
> subscribed) first, but I could not find any mention about this: are there
> any persistent problems with the kde packages for potato that used to be
> available at kde.tdyc.com? Apparently, only some of the aut
Hello, I browsed through the list archives (I am not
subscribed) first, but I could not find any mention about this: are there
any persistent problems with the kde packages for potato that used to be
available at kde.tdyc.com? Apparently, only some of the authoritative DNS
servers for the t
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2001-05-25
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
I've already packaged this up. The menu stuff and the build-dependencies
may not be quite right but other than that, the package is in good shape.
However I can't take on another package right
andrea gelmini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit
Hi,
> > There are more then enough machines around that already have
> > problems with the package management. Machines that must run
> > with 16 or maybe 8 MB of memory (or even less) with an 386sx/16
> > CPU or similar.
> do you really i
(Disclaimer: I'n not a Debian devoloper nor did I read the ancient flame
wars.)
Michael Neuffer wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/$ apt-cache search . | wc -l
> >7230
> >
> > what's another 40 packages?
>
> Argh !
>
>
> Exactly this brain damaged behaviour is why we have
> so many (useless mi
On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 10:32:41AM +0200, Michael Neuffer wrote:
> Exactly this brain damaged behaviour is why we have
> so many (useless mini)packages !
i don't think this is stupid. if I want one thing, I want
that one, and only that. using packages it's good, because I
can manage with the soft
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, 25. May 2001 10:32, Michael Neuffer wrote:
> What I oppose is stupid splits of packages and things like the
> 50th ICQ client.
Hmm, then why are so many "small" editors there? The first thing after a
standard debian install is to remove al
Quoting Rob Walker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > On Thu, 24 May 2001 20:23:35 -0500, Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > said:
>
> Ben> Options are (1) release one huge-arse binary package; (2) release
> Ben> 39 packages, one for each theme; (3) release a moderate number of
> Ben> packages ea
> Is it generally possible (I know this is possible with sawfish) for the
> user to install a theme without root privileges? If so, then one big theme
> package is useful to allow a user to browse themes, select the one(s) they
> like, and copy it/them into an appropriate spot in their home direc
> Although best would be a KDE-theme installer. Are the themes
> available individually anywhere, in a format consistent enough for
> automating the debianization and installation?
By this do you mean an empty debian package whose configuration procedure is
to download themes and install them o
On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 01:19:41AM -0600, Bruce Sass wrote:
> On Thu, 24 May 2001, Rob Walker wrote:
>
> > > On Thu, 24 May 2001 20:23:35 -0500, Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > said:
> >
> > Ben> Options are (1) release one huge-arse binary package; (2) release
> > Ben> 39 packages,
On Thu, 24 May 2001, Rob Walker wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 May 2001 20:23:35 -0500, Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > said:
>
> Ben> Options are (1) release one huge-arse binary package; (2) release
> Ben> 39 packages, one for each theme; (3) release a moderate number of
> Ben> packages each c
On 2001.05.24 20:18:34 +0200 James Lindenschmidt wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> I'm a KDE 2.1.1 user on my Debian potato 2.2r3 machine who also plays
> around
> wtih Ximian GNOME. Well, after the latest "upgrade" from Ximian, gdm
> thinks
> KDE isn't installed on my system. I'm tired of Ximian GNOME br
> On Thu, 24 May 2001 20:23:35 -0500, Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
Ben> Options are (1) release one huge-arse binary package; (2) release
Ben> 39 packages, one for each theme; (3) release a moderate number of
Ben> packages each containing a few themes.
Ben> I am hesitant to do
37 matches
Mail list logo
