Re: Circular build dependency in maven-plugin-tools

Hi Onkar, On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 10:44 PM, Onkar Shinde wrote: > maven-plugin-tools 2.4.3-1 in Debian unstable has build dep on > libmaven-plugin-tools-java which is a package created by > maven-plugin-tools itself. Can you please fix this circular build > dependency? no that is not possible. Ev

Re: Circular build dependency in maven-plugin-tools

On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 6:52 AM, Onkar Shinde wrote: > Any advice on how to build this package in pbuilder and/or buildd? Just add deb http://people.debian.org/~twerner/ ./ to your sources.list. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject o

Re: Circular build dependency in maven-plugin-tools

Hi, On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Vincent Fourmond wrote: > Maybe I'm interfering here, but I'm pretty sure that such a dirty > hack is a no-go for the security team. that hack in not needed in Debian because the package is in unstable. Can you explain what is the problem for the security tea

Re: Circular build dependency in maven-plugin-tools

On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Vincent Fourmond wrote: > The problem here is that you don't have a complex package: one > binary, which build-depends on itself. Surely, you can work around > that, can't you ? How? Just send me a patch and I'll apply it if it works. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNS

Re: Circular build dependency in maven-plugin-tools

On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Vincent Fourmond wrote: > You managed to build it at some point. You didn't have it before and > you had it after. So you did manage one to work around that. So you > should be able to build it without build-depending on itself, no ? I had simply put the upstream

Re: Request to join Java team

Hi Petter, On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > The number of commits seem to indicate it is not quite dead yet.  I > hoped some of the other project admins would add you, but will try to > get it done tomorrow unless someone betas me to it. I have added him. Cheers, T

Re: Fix for #512149 - checkstyle: provide /usr/bin/checkstyle

Hi Dominik, On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Dominik Smatana wrote: > I'm sending improved version (using java-wrappers) for review please. (see > attached diff2.txt) > > Any feedback is welcome. default-jre | java1-runtime | java2-runtime can be reduced to default-jre | java2-runtime and the

Re: Fix for #512149 - checkstyle: provide /usr/bin/checkstyle

On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Dominik Smatana wrote: > OK, I'll test it. I am pretty sure that the file debian/dirs is not needed because dh_install always creates the needed directories. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "u

Re: RFS: libslf4j-java (updated package)

Hi Damien, On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:45 PM, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.5.8-1 > of package "libslf4j-java". unfortunately java-gcj-compat-dev is still broken: . Someone needs to fix this bu

Re: RFS: libslf4j-java (updated package)

Hi, On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:44 PM, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > You should check my package in chroot now ;) I have uploaded it now. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.or

Re: RFS: libspring-2.5-java

Hi Damien, On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:32 PM, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > Torsten, as you already checked previous version of this package could you > please ahve a look ? uploaded. Thanks for the package. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Re: RFS: jetty6

Hi Ludovic, On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 10:16 PM, Ludovic Claude wrote: > Thanks for your suggestions. I have uploaded a new version of jetty into > mentors.d.o, plus a new version of tomcat6 which contains a little > packaging change used by jetty. I have uploaded tomcat6. Thanks, Torsten -- To

Re: RFS: jetty6

Hi Ludovic, On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM, Ludovic Claude wrote: > Torsten Werner has already uploaded the change for tomcat 6, now I > simply need a sponsor for jetty. debian/copyright is not complete yet. There are other copyrights like: contrib/jetty-ant/src/main/java/org/mortbay

Re: RFS: junit4 (updated package)

Hi Damien, On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 10:42 PM, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.6-2 of "junit4". I have uploaded the package. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C

Re: ldapjdk & jss maintenance in pkg-java svn

Hi Michele, On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Michele Baldessari wrote: > I'd like to ask for commit access (user mbaldessari-guest) to the > pkg-java svn, in order to maintain there ldapjdk (#474490) and jss > (#474489). I am very sorry for the delay. (You requested the commit access during my

Re: RFS: libcommons-codec-java (updated package)

Hi Damien, On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3-5 > of package "libcommons-codec-java". uploaded. Thanks, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou

Re: RFS: cglib2.1 (updated package)

On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.1.3.dfsg.2-2 > of package "cglib2.1". > > It builds these binary packages: > libcglib2.1-java - code generation library for Java > libcglib2.1-java-doc - code generation library for Java

Re: java-problem in lenny

Hi Claudia, On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 10:19 PM, Claudia Neumann wrote: > I need help with a java program. which program? > In Debian lenny with openjdk-6 6b11-9.1+lenny2 and/or sun-java6-bin 6-12-1 I > get an error with that program. What kind of error do you get? Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUB

Re: RFS: electric 8.09-1

Hi Onkar, On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Onkar Shinde wrote: > Can anyone please sponsor the package electric 8.09-1. done. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Debconf Java BOF discussions

Hi Matthew, On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Matthew Johnson wrote: > I've arranged for a Debian Java BOF at Debconf this year which I know many > people won't be at, so I'd like to have some sort of pre-discussion first. thanks for organizing the BOF and I will be there. I currently do not have

inofficial package archive and upload queue

Hi, as a first result from Debconf9 I am announcing the setup of an inofficial package archive and upload queue. The details can be found in the Debian wiki at . I'll move my packages now from http://people.debian.org/~twerner/ to the new archive. Cheer

Re: inofficial package archive and upload queue

On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Michael Koch wrote: > And that helps exactly what? The referenced page lists no reasons. "for packages that are stuck in NEW" - I could add: and their reverse dependencies. I use it in my cowbuilder setup. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-jav

updating java-common for openjdk

Hi, I have rebuilt 116 source packages from the trunk dir in SVN with Ubuntu's version of java-common which uses openjdk as the default-jdk instead of gcj. 3 packages fail to build now. I have filed bug reports

Re: updating java-common for openjdk

I have uploaded java-common 0.33 to unstable. On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Onkar Shinde wrote: > This is a welcome move from Ubuntu developers point of view. Now that > the tool chain for java will be same in both distributions more > patches can flow in either direction. Strictly speaking D

Re: Reviews from the DebConf BoF

Hi Matthew, On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Matthew Johnson wrote: > Comments please, we do no longer want to use /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/simple-patchsys.mk for patching source code. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscri

Re: Reviews from the DebConf BoF

Hi Onkar, On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 9:40 PM, Onkar Shinde wrote: > Can you please explain more what do you mean by new source format? please read the manpage of dpkg-source and search for the Section 'Format: 3.0 (quilt)'. It is not yet integrated into dak but a patch is already available. Cheers,

Re: java installation bug

Hi Fred, On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Fred wrote: > One of these last day, I felt on this error (see here under). I have found a somewhat different problem in a sid chroot: $ apt-get install sun-java5-bin java-gcj-compat [...] Selecting previously deselected package java-gcj-compat-headles

Re: Library packages: co-installability, build-depends, transitions

Hi Matthew, thank you for your ideas but I still see a problem. On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Matthew Johnson wrote: > In the list below when I say "version" I mean "API version" not > "upstream release version". API version changes when upstream change the > API and is encoded in the package

javax-servletapi2.3

Hi, we still have that package in Debian. Do we really need it? Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: javadoc problem with default-jdk

Hi Matthew, On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Matthew Johnson wrote: > Does it support building packages with debhelper rather than cdbs? Please see . Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.

Re: RFS: remotetea - Sun ONC/RPC support for Java

Hi Matthew, 2009/8/8 Matthew Johnson : >  - You've given the debian/ copyright as GPL3 but the rest is GPL2+. >  Aside from the fact I don't like the  GPL3, this means the resulting >  binary package is GPL3 and can't be used with other GPL2-only packages. I don't think that is true as long as th

Re: RFS: azureus (updated package, fixes RC bug)

On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Onkar Shinde wrote: > I believe /usr/bin/vuze is just a wrapper script. So unless the mail > class of the application accepts some arguments, I don't think a > manpage would make any sense. Every file in /usr/bin should have at least a short manpage (policy 12.1) ex

Re: pkg-java team, subversion, git (was: Bug#540756: solr-common: please move packaging to GIT)

Hi Jan-Pascal, On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Jan-Pascal van Best wrote: > Any thoughts from the team? I would really love to convert out svn repo to git and even volunteer in doing the actual conversion. BUT! The number of active team members is really too low. I think that git would make i

Re: pkg-java team, subversion, git

Hi, On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Vincent Fourmond wrote: >  I'm wondering: would it be a good idea to remove everything but to > leave a dummy file in pkg-java/trunk/solr stating that the packaging > has been moved to a git repository ? I recommend moving such packages from trunk to old not

Re: pkg-java team, subversion, git

On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Jan-Pascal van Best wrote: > It seems like 'old' contains 'old packages', that aren't maintained > anymore. Moving solr there would suggest that Debian packaging of solr > has halted.  I would prefer Vincent's suggestion. What do others think? sounds reasonable C

Re: libjava3d-jni (AMD64)

Hi Onkar, On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 6:04 AM, Onkar Shinde wrote: > The java3d package has failed to build on all non-i386 platforms. I am > looking into build failures. It should be fixed in a day or two. default-jdk should be moved to Build-Depends. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: RFS: libxjavadoc-java (updated package)

Hi Florian, On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 3:12 AM, Florian Grandel wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1-4 > of my package "libxjavadoc-java". uploaded. Thanks, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?

Re: RFS: libxdoclet-java (updated package)

Hi, On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 3:14 AM, Florian Grandel wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2.3-4 > of my package "libxdoclet-java". uploaded. Thanks, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

Re: Bug#529493: libnsuml-java: Please remove build-dep on jikes-kaffe

On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:13 AM, Barry deFreese wrote: > Bumping this to serious now since jikes has been removed from the archive. This broken package cannot be built with any jdom version that is available in unstable. That is why I vote for removing it. Does anybody object? Cheers, Torsten -

Re: RFS: commons-pool (updated package)

Hi Damien, On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 9:21 PM, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.5.2-1 > of my package "commons-pool". I have uploaded both packages. Thanks, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "un

Re: Any plan to update java-gnome?

On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Onkar Shinde wrote: > Can someone from Debian Java team please process this upload? It seems > both the previous uploaders are busy. done Thanks for the package, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubs

Re: RFS: java3d 1.5.2+dfsg-3

On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Onkar Shinde wrote: > I am looking for the sponsorship of new revision of java3d. It builds on sparc, ia64, and amd64 but I see strange messages during javadoc. The build log . Does anyone have a

Re: RFS: java3d 1.5.2+dfsg-3

On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > The concurrent collector will throw an OutOfMemoryError if too much time is > being spent in garbage collection: if more than 98% of the total time is > spent in garbage collection and less than 2% of the heap is recovered, an > OutOfMem

Re: RFS: java3d 1.5.2+dfsg-3

On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:19 PM, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > On my amd64, I'm getting "GC overhead limit exceeded" with 1.5.2+dfsg-*2* but > I've managed to get 1.5.2+dfsg-*3* successfuly built :) Horror! Upstream's build.xml sets the maxmemory attribute to 128m and I am building on a 64 bit arc

Re: RFS: junit4 (updated package)

Hi Damien, On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.7-1 > of package "junit4". I have uploaded both junit4 and commons-vfs. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Re: Bug#543073: libjboss-aop-java: FTBFS: java errors

tags 543073 + help thanks Hi, On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: [javac] 433 problems (1 error, 432 warnings) > > BUILD FAILED it looks like a qdox problem: "[javac] /tmp/buildd/libjboss-aop-java-2.0.0.SP1/src/aspect-framework/main/org/jboss/aop/annotation/compiler/Annotat

Re: Bug#543085: libhibernate3-java: FTBFS: You must specify a valid JAVA_HOME or JAVACMD!

tags 543085 + help thanks On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on > amd64. Any help is appriated: "[javac] /tmp/buildd/libhibernate3-java-3.3.1.GA+dak1/project/core/src/main/java/org/hibernate/jdbc/Res

Re: Bug#543134: libjboss-remoting-java: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency: libtomcat5.5-java

tags 543134 + help thanks I need help with this package: "[javac] /tmp/buildd/libjboss-remoting-java-2.5.1/src/org/jboss/remoting/transport/coyote/OutputBuffer.java:611: cannot find symbol [javac] symbol : method convert(org.apache.tomcat.util.buf.CharChunk,org.apache.tomcat.util.buf.By

Re: RFS: swing-layout (updated package - fixes RC bug)

Hi Niels, On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.3-2 > of the package "swing-layout". the package does not build with svn-buildpackage but I have uploaded it anyway. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-req

Re: libjgrapht0.6-java_0.6.0-7_amd64.changes is NEW

Hi Steffen, On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Archive Administrator wrote: > (new) libjgrapht0.6-java-link_0.6.0-7_all.deb optional libs have we already agreed on such packages? Why don't we just ship an unversioned libjgrapht-java package without the -link suffix? Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBS

Bug categories

Hi, I have played in a dark corner of the Debian BTS with the following result: or a bit shorter . I have c

Re: RFS: libjakarta-poi-java (updated package)

Hi Damien, On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. done. Thanks for the package, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas..

Re: RFS: javatar (updated package - fixes RC bug)

Hi Niels, On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 11:37 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.5+dfsg-3 > of my package "javatar". this version is not committed to the svn repo. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subjec

Re: RFS: jasperreports (new package)

Hi Damien, On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "jasperreports". I do not really like the orig tarball that I got with 'debian/rules get-orig-source'. Maybe the SCM at

Re: RFS: jasperreports (new package)

On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > I'll removed it as I don't use it during build and it weight too much > (18Mb!) May you update debian/orig-tar.exclude please to make sure that the tarball for the next upstream version will be cleaned, too? Thanks, Torsten -- To UN

Re: RFS: jasperreports (new package)

On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 10:42 PM, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > Fixed in SVN. uploaded now Thanks, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: RFS: libhibernate3-java (FTBFS #543085)

On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 10:14 PM, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > If it's fine for you, could someone upload this release ? uploaded Thanks, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: RFS: Reupload of excalibur-logkit

On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Onkar Shinde wrote: > It looks like Matthew is busy. Can any other developer from Debian > Java team process this upload for me? I'll upload it. It's a very minor change. Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Re: RFS: java-gnome 4.0.13-1

Hi Onkar, On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 8:29 PM, Onkar Shinde wrote: > I am looking for sponsorship for java-gnome version 4.0.13-1. uploaded. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.or

help needed with libjamon-java 2.7

Hi, I need some help with this package which has already been moved to pkg-java's svn repo. The build log of version 2.7 is available at . The relevant part is: [javac] /tmp/buildd/libjamon-java-2.7/src/java/com/jamontomca

Re: Looking for somewhere to help

Hi Luke, On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 8:28 AM, Luke Cycon wrote: > So I am here to (try to) help you guys out, and if you wouldn't mind > pointing me towards some packages that need some attention, that would > be wonderful. nice - libjamon-java FTBFS:

Re: Looking for somewhere to help

On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Luke Cycon wrote: > If you could point me towards the 2.7 source, that would be great.  I > found the debian related package tidbits in the svn repo. You can get it from if 'debian/rules get-orig-so

Re: Looking for somewhere to help

Hi Luke, On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 1:55 AM, Luke Cycon wrote: > Nevertheless, I fixed both of them up, and have a working version.  Now > I just need to know what patch system you would like me to put in to > accommodate this patch (there isnt one at this point), I would prefer > quilt, but it is u

Re: RFS: excalibur-logger 2.1-1

Hi Onkar, On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Onkar Shinde wrote: > I am looking for sponsor for package excalibur-logger 2.1-1. the description of excalibur-logkit and excalibur-logger are almost the same. Can you make them more distinguishable? Minor: I would prefer having a get-orig-source targe

Re: RFS: libjamon-java 2.7-2

Hi Luke, On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 8:31 PM, Luke Cycon wrote: > I am looking for sponsorship of this latest version of libjamon-java looks good, please merge your changes into the svn repo. > (2.7-2). ... but keep 2.7-1 as the version number. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia

Re: Bug#546513: Please drop {Build-,}Depends on sun-java5-*

On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Chris Lamb wrote: > Package: pj > Severity: serious > Version: 0.0~20080628-1 no reverse (build) deps, low popcon, outdated upstream version, last upload > 14 months, nobody cared to move it from contrib to main [x] vote for removal if nobody wants to fix the pac

Re: RFS: libjamon-java 2.7-2

Hi Luke, On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 1:53 AM, Luke Cycon wrote: > Will do. uploaded. > You want me to fix that and put it back on mentors? No, I don't really care what's on mentors. Thanks, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe"

Re: Considering removal of kaffe

Hi Michael, On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Michael Koch wrote: > Yes, we need to remove kaffe. I think we dont need bugs against te packages > maintained by pkg-java. I will work on them and remove (build-)deps on kaffe > in the next days. thanks. The current list of packages:

Re: Versioned Dependencies (Was: Re: libjgrapht0.6-java_0.6.0-7_amd64.changes is NEWW)

Hi Matt, On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Matthew Johnson wrote: > possibly aided by binnmus AFAIK binNMUs won't work for most java packages. 1. They work for languages where API (source level compatibilty) and ABI (binary compatibility) are not the same. You will binMNU a package whenever the

Bug#546768: ITP: libjboss-marshalling-java -- alternative serialization API

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Torsten Werner * Package name: libjboss-marshalling-java Version : 1.1.3.GA Upstream Author : JBoss Community * URL : http://jboss.org/jbossmarshalling/ * License : LGPL Programming Lang: Java Description

Bug#546769: ITP: libjboss-nxio-java -- simplified low-level I/O layer

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Torsten Werner * Package name: libjboss-nxio-java Version : 1.2.1.GA Upstream Author : JBoss Community * URL : http://jboss.org/xnio/ * License : LGPL Programming Lang: Java Description : simplified low-level I/O

Re: Java packages in main depending on non-free java.

replying to debian-java On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Niels Thykier wrote: > libjgroups-java: >        Varun Hiremath (u) >        Torsten Werner (u) I have uploaded a fixed package. > weka: >        Soeren Sonnenburg (u) >        Torsten Werner (u) This is a false po

Re: RFS: libjboss-remoting-java 2.5.1-1

Hi Luke, On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 1:09 AM, Luke Cycon wrote: > I am looking for sponsorship of this latest version of > libjboss-remoting-java (2.5.1-1). please commit your changes into the svn repo. Thanks, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subje

Re: RFS: excalibur-logger 2.1-1

On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Onkar Shinde wrote: > Meanwhile I have added get-orig-source target in debian/rules, > commited the change in svn and uploaded updated package on m.d.n. I have uploaded the package after a minor fix in debian/copyright. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Re: RFS: libjboss-remoting-java 2.5.1-1

On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:54 AM, Luke Cycon wrote: > Anyways, its in there now. The new files in svn had the svn:executable property. I have fixed that and uploaded the package. Thanks, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe".

Re: RFS: java-gnome 4.0.13-2

On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Onkar Shinde wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for package java-gnome version 4.0.13-2. uploaded Thanks, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: RFS: jakarta-jmeter 2.3.4-1

On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Vincent Fourmond wrote: >  lintian package*.changes | lintian-info RTFM :) "Note, that the lintian command has a command line option -i to automatically pipe its output through lintian-info. Thus, you will rarely use this command directly." Cheers, Torsten --

Re: RM of kaffe and libslide-webdavclient-java

Hi Niels, On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: > libjboss-buildmagic-java has a popcon of 11 and no r(b)depends (other than > itself). As far as I can tell, the original upstream has renamed it to > jboss-buildmagic-thirdparty (which explains why the watch file is broken). > > I

Re: maven2 installing gcj base

Hi Bruno, On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Bruno Ramos wrote: > I was trying to install maven2 and it's pulling a lot of dependencies > including gcj-4.3-base. that might be an indirect dependency. I cannot check the details because I am on an island for vacation without access to a Debian machin

Re: Bug#552173: libjboss-buildmagic-java: please don't depend on slide-webdavclient

reopen 552173 retitle 552173 ITP: libjboss-buildmagic-java reassign 552173 wnpp thanks I think removing the package was too fast. On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 10:45 PM, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > The suggested migration path is to use Apache Jackrabbit instead. Nice idea, but AFAIK there is no ja

Re: Bug#552173: libjboss-buildmagic-java: please don't depend on slide-webdavclient

On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Barry deFreese wrote: > Nope, jackrabbit is not in Debian and libjboss-buildmagic-java isn't > exactly setting the world on fire with the number of users. jboss-buildmagic is one of the most important packages for building jbossas5. Yes, jbossas5 is not in Debian

Re: RFS: commons-httpclient 3.1-8

Hi, On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Onkar Shinde wrote: > I am looking for sponsorship for commons-httpclient version 3.1-8. The > packaging bits are in pkg-java svn. uploaded. Thanks, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". T

Re: About source format 3.0

Hi, On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 7:59 AM, Onkar Shinde wrote: > The reason I asked if we should switch as team is because one of the > conclusions of debconf discussions was that we will be no longer using > cdbs simple patchsys to make transition to source format 3 easier. [1] ... and we can remove

Re: About source format 3.0

On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Torsten Werner wrote: > [*] I am using git-buildpackage's patch queue stuff described at > <https://honk.sigxcpu.org/piki/development/debian_packages_in_git/> to > update debian/patches. That works nicely even with svn. But git-import-ds

Re: RFS: cortado 0.5.1-1

On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 8:18 PM, Onkar Shinde wrote: > Can anyone please sponsor this package? Sorry, I am busy with dak. I have uploaded the package now. The Build-Depends: quilt could have been removed. Thanks, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Re: Which Debian package has which Java package?

Hi Thomas, Thomas Koch schrieb: I don't know, if it is possible to run this kind of scripts on some debian server? And how can one quickly determine whether a package contains java .jar files? you can try that on merkel. Getting the jar files: projectb=> $ psql -p 5433 projectb select * from

Re: Which Debian package has which Java package?

Hi Thomas, Thomas Koch schrieb: thanks for the hint, but since I'm not a DD, I think I can't access "merkel". but the filesystem structure is the same on all mirrors except for $ROOT_OF_DEBIAN_MIRROR which should be a parameter. If you want to prepare the scripts and I am willing to test th

Re: RFS: libxmlenc-java

Thomas Koch schrieb: Yes. I'm not a DD and can not setup a GIT repository on git.debian.org Please go to , create an account and click at . Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ.

looking for new Admins for our alioth project

Hi, the current list of members of the pkg-java project on alioth can be seen at . There are too few people (about one) that are really doing admin tasks like checking and accepting new 'junior developers'. Please contact me if you a

Re: looking for new Admins for our alioth project

Hi Sylvestre, On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > I can help you with that if you want... (I am doing this for debian > science already) I have promoted you to admin status. We have two more admins now, which is nice. Thanks, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-j

Re: build.sysclasspath instead of patching upstream build.xml?

Hi Thomas, On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Thomas Koch wrote: > export CLASSPATH+=:$(CURDIR)/lib/*.jar:/usr/share/java:/usr/share/java/*.jar > export ANT_OPTS+= -Dbuild.sysclasspath=first -Dant.build.clonevm=true > >        ant -propertyfile debian/ant.properties -buildfile > debian/build-over

Re: mysql-connector-java-5.1.10.jar in debian squeeze works not with prepared queries

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Olivier Berger schrieb: > Maybe this should primarily be reported to bugs.debian.org ? it is: #564961 Cheers, Torsten -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iE

Re: Bug#559789: libgnucrypto-java: CVE-2008-5659 predictable random number generator

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 retitle 559789 RM: libgnucrypto-java -- RoM; security issue, no rdeps, low popcon reassing 559789 ftp.debian.org clone 559789 -1 retitle -1 RM: libgnucrypto-java/stable -- RoM; security issue, no rdeps, low popcon reassing -1 release.debian.org thanks

Re: RC bug suggestions for upcoming BSP?

Hi, On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Pablo Duboue wrote: > I'm attending DebianNYC BSP [1] this week-end, and would like to take a look > at any outstanding RC bug in debian-java maintained packages. Do you have any > suggestions? It seems there'll be a HPPA machine available at the BSP. accordi

Liferay packaging for Debian and Ubuntu

Hi, I'd like to find out if there is some interest in the Debian und Ubuntu Java communities to package Liferay Portal. Liferay is a portal server implementing the Java Portlet Specification JSR-286. It can run in a variety of application servers like Tomcat and JBoss and

Re: Liferay packaging for Debian and Ubuntu

Hi Damien, Damien Raude-Morvan schrieb: > I'm using Liferay 5.2 on a daily basis at work so I'll join this > packaging effort. Do you want to build a new team or use pkg-java > existing infra. ? yes I would prefer the pkg-java infrastructure (having admin priviledges for many parts of it). Cheer

Re: RC bug suggestions for upcoming BSP?

On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Onkar Shinde wrote: > I just attached a patch to this bug. It certainly wasn't trivial. :-) Yes I've found that out for myself. Thanks for your work! I've moved the package into our svn repo, applied your patch and uploaded the new version. Cheers, Torsten -- T

Re: Is JSTL available in repositories

On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > In fact, /usr/share/java/glassfish-appserv-jstl.jar IS JSTL reference > implementation from Apache. It contains package > org.apache.taglibs.standard.* Interesting. I am the original maintainer of glassfish but I did not known that. :)

Re: RFS: libcommons-el-java (Regression fix)

Hi Niels, Niels Thykier schrieb: > I am looking for a sponsor to upload libcommons-el-java, which will fix > a regression (#559323), which was introduced by being built by a java6 > compiler without having set target version. uploaded. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-r

Re: packages with maven support

On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4...@gmail.com> wrote: > gnu-getopt > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libgetopt-java/libgetopt-java_1.0.13-2.dsc ... > Could any DD review/upload them? > Please, don't do it you all at the same time :p uploaded. Cheers, Torste

  1   2   3   4   >