Hi,
I'm currently struggling with eclipse 3.1.0's subversion support. As
recently the libsvn-javahl went into unstable I wanted to remove my own
"hack" for that (copying the jar and .so's into JAVA_HOME/jre/lib/i386
and lib/ext), but it seems that starting eclipse doesn't put /usr/lib
into the jav
On 10.10.05 00:01:02, Michael Koch wrote:
> We (my sponsor and I) will upload Eclipse to the contrib section for
> now as it depends on lucene and tomcat5 which are still in contrib.
I'm curious: Why does Eclipse depend on tomcat5? At least the binaries
from eclipse.org don't need it.
Andreas
--
On 14.10.05 17:42:58, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> I am standing by the standalone version of SWT because I think it is
> technically better to maintain a library used by multiple applications
> in its own source package, and not within an application source
> package. Look, by example, at GTK (GIMP Tool
On 27.10.05 20:55:41, Gordon Pedersen wrote:
> I'm reluctant to post to a developers list, but this question
> got no help at debian-user in the past 2 days. It seems to be
> debian-related more than generic java-related.
It's not even really java-related, the same can happen with any
programming
On 28.10.05 08:01:40, Gordon Pedersen wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 12:09:42PM +0200, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > On 27.10.05 20:55:41, Gordon Pedersen wrote:
> > Hmm, if I'm correct, the constructor of ImageIcon is called with a
> > relative path for the Image file
Hi,
I do find it really great to have eclipse in debian (finally). Only I'm
a little confused by all those new packages. So here come my questions,
please someone shed some light on this:
1. Do I understand correctly that the "ecj" is a java 1.3/1.4 compiler
that I can get either as "pure-java-ve
On 17.12.05 12:20:53, Michael Koch wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 01:59:54AM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I do find it really great to have eclipse in debian (finally). Only I'm
> > a little confused by all those new packages. So here come my qu
On 17.12.05 13:28:27, Michael Koch wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 12:09:08PM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > On 17.12.05 12:20:53, Michael Koch wrote:
> > > On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 01:59:54AM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> &g
On 17.12.05 13:54:55, Michael Koch wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 12:42:36PM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > > Only when using GCJ to run Eclipse and eclipse-ecj-gcj is installed.
> >
> > Ok, got that installed.
> >
> > > Eclipse just calls the main
On 17.12.05 14:47:11, Michael Koch wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 01:26:07PM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > On 17.12.05 13:54:55, Michael Koch wrote:
> > Anyway, somethings not working here as expected. Having
> > JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/jvm/java/gcj is _much_ slower (i
On 17.12.05 15:47:15, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 2005-12-17 at 16:35 +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
> > > Also the generics don't work when using the java-gcj-compat VM as you
> > > suggested for beeing able to use ecj as compiler.
> >
> > All language extensions from Java 5.0 work with G
On 17.12.05 14:46:52, Stephan Michels wrote:
> On 12/17/05, Andreas Pakulat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
> > > > org.tigris.subversion.javahl.SVNClient not found in
> > > > gnu.gcj.runtime.SystemCla
On 17.12.05 16:45:08, Stephan Michels wrote:
> On 12/17/05, Andreas Pakulat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 17.12.05 14:46:52, Stephan Michels wrote:
> > > On 12/17/05, Andreas Pakulat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
>
On 21.02.06 17:34:38, Michael Koch wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 03:38:39PM +0100, Ivan F. Villanueva B. wrote:
> > > I worked around this problem by using Sun's J2SDK 1.5 to run Eclipse.
> > > Luckily
> > > you've made it very easy to do so: I just had to change some lines in
> > > /etc/eclips
Hi,
I'm facing the same bug as in #361672 and I wonder why there's no
response to that bug since nearly 2 months. Is there just no solution
other than waiting for the next upload?
Andreas
--
It's lucky you're going so slowly, because you're going in the wrong direction.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
On 30.05.06 20:28:06, Michael Koch wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 07:45:46PM +0200, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm facing the same bug as in #361672 and I wonder why there's no
> > response to that bug since nearly 2 months. Is there just no so
On 30.05.06 20:28:06, Michael Koch wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 07:45:46PM +0200, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm facing the same bug as in #361672 and I wonder why there's no
> > response to that bug since nearly 2 months. Is there just no so
17 matches
Mail list logo
