On 17.12.05 14:47:11, Michael Koch wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 01:26:07PM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > On 17.12.05 13:54:55, Michael Koch wrote:
> > Anyway, somethings not working here as expected. Having
> > JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/jvm/java/gcj is _much_ slower (in startup) than using
> > SUN's JDK. And I can't use Java 1.5 features such as template-classes.
> >
> > Also it seems that java-gcj VM doesn't load jar files from
> > /usr/share/java. I get a class not found exception for the javahl
> > library on startup:
> >
> > java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.tigris.subversion.javahl.SVNClient
> > not found in
> > gnu.gcj.runtime.SystemClassLoader{urls=[file:/usr/lib/eclipse/startup.jar],
> > parent=gnu.gcj.runtime.ExtensionClassLoader{urls=[], parent=null}}
> >
> > The difference in startup is 1minute (with gcj), 40 seconds(with vm=sun,
> > java=java-gcj) and 30 seconds(with vm=sun and java=sun)
> >
> > Any thoughts about this?
>
> We have a bug in /usr/bin/eclipse up to eclipse 3.1.1-6. -7 will fix
> this. The problem is that we use the wrong way to lookup the native jars
> in GCJ. We use the old way of searching for C++ ABI jars first. We should use
> the new way to look for BC ABI jars first as all native jars are
> compiled with BC ABI. To achieve this please add
>
> -Dgnu.gcj.runtime.VMClassLoader.library_control=never \
The startup time got better (first start was worse, but the 2nd and 3rd
were as fast as Sun's JDK). But I still have the UnkownClassException -
maybe I should file a bug report for this, but which package?
java-gcj-compat, or some eclipse-package?
Also the generics don't work when using the java-gcj-compat VM as you
suggested for beeing able to use ecj as compiler.
Andreas
--
You will wish you hadn't.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
