Hi,
for vim, there's vim-addon-manager to enable or disable vim plugins for each
individual user. This makes a lot of sense, since vim plugins are of varying
quality and you may not force all users to use a plugin.
Plugins are still installed as regular debian packages, but only enabled via
sy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Koch wrote:
> I'm not experienced enought with eclipse to know, whether such a setup
> would make sens for eclipse too. However what surely makes sense, would be
> the ability to install plugins not only as debian packages, but also via
> the ec
Buongiorno,
sono Giorgia Ferrari, assistente Marketing di Forum Media Srl, societÃ
operante nel campo dell'editoria e della formazione professionale.
La presente per richiederLe l'autorizzazione, ai sensi della vigente normativa
sulla Privacy, ad inviarLe, a titolo informativo, tramite e-mail q
I started the packaging in a new GIT repository from scratch:
http://github.com/thkoch2001/pkg-debian-libxmlenc-java2
When this one is good, I'll also add it to git.d.o (Need to find out how)
I thought, searched and discussed several hours about the right thing to do
with upstream .jar and fina
Hi,
please note that even if the other bug (#560093) got closed, your
package still can't be built:
| The following packages have unmet dependencies:
| default-jdk-builddep: Depends: gcj-jdk but it is not going to be installed
| E: Broken packages
(This is sid/amd64.)
Logging into the chroot,
On 11.12.2009 05:25, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi,
please note that even if the other bug (#560093) got closed, your
package still can't be built:
| The following packages have unmet dependencies:
| default-jdk-builddep: Depends: gcj-jdk but it is not going to be installed
| E: Broken packages
(
Matthias Klose (11/12/2009):
>> I'm Cc-ing -java@, they might tweak some package relationships to
>> help package managers figure out a solution.
>
> I would prefer to see gjdoc being removed for the release, if
> possible. for the packages build-depending it for now, just remove
> it from the b-
On 09.12.2009 00:03, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 08.12.2009, 23:44 +0100 schrieb Matthias Klose:
On 08.12.2009 19:14, Adrian Perez wrote:
Hello Mathias.
Although is still an open discussion, we're making our best efforts to
not build SWT from eclipse at all, and just make it depend
java-common_0.34_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
java-common_0.34.dsc
java-common_0.34.tar.gz
java-common_0.34_all.deb
default-jdk-doc_0.34_all.deb
default-jre_1.6-34_i386.deb
default-jre-headless_1.6-34_i386.deb
default-jdk_1.6-34_i386.deb
defa
9 matches
Mail list logo
