-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Koch wrote:
> - Should all java stuff be repackaged? For example the xmlenc upstream
> tarball contains only one jar and some docs. I could as well have removed
> these files during package building.
You must remove any jars that are not built
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Koch wrote:
> Now I saw, that in the eclipse GIT repository[3] there's one tag
> upstream/3.5.1 and another one upstream/3.5.1+repack. I don't know,
> whether the eclipse package is doing so, but we could standardize on:
>
> - import the upstre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi guys,
It's been a long time I did not upload a package or made some serious
work for Debian.
I have a little baby (Arthur) for two weeks now and I'm not sure I'll
be able to dedicate time to the project ;-)
- From now, you can remove my name (Arn
I am trying to debug a problem with an annotation processor, and I need
to look at the source for javac to debug it. Openjdk-6-source only contains
the source for the runtime, and there seem to be no other source packages
referenced so I am a bit lost as to where to look.
David
--
To UNSUBSCRI
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 8:12 PM, David Goodenough
wrote:
> I am trying to debug a problem with an annotation processor, and I need
> to look at the source for javac to debug it. Openjdk-6-source only contains
> the source for the runtime, and there seem to be no other source packages
> referenced
Hello,
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 1:12 PM, David Goodenough
wrote:
> I am trying to debug a problem with an annotation processor, and I need
> to look at the source for javac to debug it. Openjdk-6-source only contains
> the source for the runtime, and there seem to be no other source packages
> r
On Monday 07 December 2009, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 8:12 PM, David Goodenough
>
> wrote:
> > I am trying to debug a problem with an annotation processor, and I need
> > to look at the source for javac to debug it. Openjdk-6-source only
> > contains the source for the runtime, a
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 8:58 PM, David Goodenough
wrote:
> That does NOT seem to contain the source of the compiler. There should
> be a file called TreeMaker.java, and it is not present (at least find can
> not find it). There is a directory rt, which contains (as the
> openjdk-6-src package do
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 1:58 PM, David Goodenough
wrote:
>> The orig.tar.gz is probably the only one you need though.
>>
> That does NOT seem to contain the source of the compiler. There should
> be a file called TreeMaker.java, and it is not present (at least find can
> not find it). There is a
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> Admitedly, this way of packaging is not the most transparent there is.
Hopefully it will now be a thing of the past since we have dpkg-source
v3 formats are now accepted in the archive.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
-
Hi David,
On Mon, 7 Dec 2009 12:58:59 +, David Goodenough
wrote:
> That does NOT seem to contain the source of the compiler. There should
> be a file called TreeMaker.java, and it is not present (at least find
can
> not find it). There is a directory rt, which contains (as the
> openjdk-6-
Hi,
java3d currently fails to build on hppa because it uses some sun
specific APIs and default-jdk is GCJ on hppa. A solution for this
could be to use openjdk-6-jdk build-dep instead of default-jdk. But
the problem is that there are no openjdk-* packages on hppa.
Does anyone know if there is any
On Monday 07 December 2009, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 1:58 PM, David Goodenough
>
> wrote:
> >> The orig.tar.gz is probably the only one you need though.
> >
> > That does NOT seem to contain the source of the compiler. There
should
> > be a file called TreeMaker.java, an
On 07.12.2009 14:36, Onkar Shinde wrote:
Hi,
java3d currently fails to build on hppa because it uses some sun
specific APIs and default-jdk is GCJ on hppa. A solution for this
could be to use openjdk-6-jdk build-dep instead of default-jdk. But
the problem is that there are no openjdk-* packages
On 07.12.2009 14:22, Paul Wise wrote:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
Admitedly, this way of packaging is not the most transparent there is.
Hopefully it will now be a thing of the past since we have dpkg-source
v3 formats are now accepted in the archive.
no, unle
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 07.12.2009 14:36, Onkar Shinde wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> java3d currently fails to build on hppa because it uses some sun
>> specific APIs and default-jdk is GCJ on hppa. A solution for this
>> could be to use openjdk-6-jdk build-dep instead
Please process this upload.
Best Regards.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:57 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 07.12.2009 14:22, Paul Wise wrote:
>> Hopefully it will now be a thing of the past since we have dpkg-source
>> v3 formats are now accepted in the archive.
>
> no, unless you write a patch for IcedTea to handle unpacked sources.
Could yo
Latest changelog entry for references. This merges changes from Ubuntu.
tijmp (0.8+dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=low
[ Onkar Shinde ]
* debian/control
- Replace build dependency openjdk-6-jdk with default-jdk.
- Add runtime dependency default-jre | java2-runtime.
* debian/rules
- Ch
19 matches
Mail list logo
