[remotetea] how to name packages ?

2009-08-04 Thread Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel
Hello I am working on the Remotetea packaging. http://remotetea.sourceforge.net/ this package build 3 .jar files jrpcgen.jar 62232 octets oncrpc.jar 89272 potmap.jar 95999 I would like to know if I need to provide 3 libraries packages, one for each .jar files and how to name them.

Re: [remotetea] how to name packages ?

2009-08-04 Thread Matthew Johnson
On Tue Aug 04 10:19, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote: > I would like to know if I need to provide 3 libraries packages, one for > each .jar files > and how to name them. > > my proble is that the java policy explain thaht it could be preferable > to have only one package if the size of the .jar file

Re: [remotetea] how to name packages ?

2009-08-04 Thread Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel
Le Tue, 4 Aug 2009 10:40:23 +0100, Matthew Johnson a écrit : > We are currently working on updating debian java policy, so a lot of > this is likely to change. > > That said, the criteria I would use for whether to have seperate > packages would be whether the jars are useful by themselves or no

Re: [remotetea] how to name packages ?

2009-08-04 Thread Matthew Johnson
On Tue Aug 04 11:51, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote: > > going to change. If you use javahelper to install them then you will > > get the correct naming scheme automatically and when we change you'll > > just have to rebuild the package (see > > http://wiki.debian.org/Java/Packaging). > > thanks fo

Re: [remotetea] how to name packages ?

2009-08-04 Thread Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel
Le Tue, 4 Aug 2009 11:17:23 +0100, Matthew Johnson a écrit : > On Tue Aug 04 11:51, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote: > > > going to change. If you use javahelper to install them then you > > > will get the correct naming scheme automatically and when we > > > change you'll just have to rebuild the

Re: [remotetea] how to name packages ?

2009-08-04 Thread Vincent Fourmond
Hello, 2009/8/4 Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel : > Now running lintian... > W: remotetea: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/jrpcgen > W: remotetea: > executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/java/jrpcgen-1.0.7.jar > > The first one needs me to provide a man page > is there an tools to help creating a man

Re: [remotetea] how to name packages ?

2009-08-04 Thread Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel
Le Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:34:59 +0200, Vincent Fourmond a écrit : > Try help2man from the package of the same name. You need to edit the > manual page produced, of course ;-)... thanks. I will add it now. > Hmmm... I guess Matthew will have a more definite opinion than me > about that. In any

Re: [remotetea] how to name packages ?

2009-08-04 Thread Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel
Le Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:34:59 +0200, Vincent Fourmond a écrit : Now thaht I added a man page I think that I have a package in good shape for upload. it use dh and the javahelper to install 3 libraries + 1 executable I need a close review of it before I asked someone to upload it for me. thanks.

Re: [remotetea] how to name packages ?

2009-08-04 Thread Matthew Johnson
On Tue Aug 04 14:34, Vincent Fourmond wrote: > Hmmm... I guess Matthew will have a more definite opinion than me > about that. In any case, don't use lintian overrides unless you have a > very good reason for that. I guess more packages are in this case. For > now, keeping the lintian warning is fi

RFS: azureus (updated package)

2009-08-04 Thread Adrian Perez
Dear friends, I am looking for a sponsor and reviewer for the new version 4.2.0.4-1 of my package "azureus". It builds these binary packages: azureus- BitTorrent client vuze - Multimedia BitTorrent client The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 329018

Re: RFS: azureus (updated package)

2009-08-04 Thread Margarita Manterola
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Adrian Perez wrote: > The upload would fix these bugs: 329018, 398014, 409952, 412213, 491624, > 515015, 516059 What about: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=509880 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=506027 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-b

Re: RFS: azureus (updated package)

2009-08-04 Thread Adrian Perez
I'll fix the remaining bugs manually when I confirm that they are a) fixed upstream b) merged c) no longer relevant. So, it's true that I might have skipped sending through mentors, but I want as many eyes as possible. Yes Shaun RFA'ed azureus a while ago, he was helping me with reviewing it, (a