Le Tue, 4 Aug 2009 10:40:23 +0100, Matthew Johnson <mj...@debian.org> a écrit :
> We are currently working on updating debian java policy, so a lot of > this is likely to change. > > That said, the criteria I would use for whether to have seperate > packages would be whether the jars are useful by themselves or not. If > you always need to have all three installed (they would depend on each > other) then you might as well have them in a single package. If you > can reasonably use them separately then it's nice for users not to > have to install all of them if they are large. That said none of them > are particularly large anyway. Yes for now I will avoid the overweigth to build multiple packages for such a small amount of code. Currently policy requires naming jars like that, but this is certainly > going to change. If you use javahelper to install them then you will > get the correct naming scheme automatically and when we change you'll > just have to rebuild the package (see > http://wiki.debian.org/Java/Packaging). thanks for the link. I will investigate with the javahelper. Do I have to replace the ant build by the jh_build process ? Thanks Fred -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
