[moving discussion to debian-java list]
Daniel Leidert wrote:
> I wanted to ask what you guys think about creating a package for just
> the extensions Norman Walsh wrote for docbook-xsl. The Java-classes can
> be found at
> http://docbook.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/docbook/trunk/xsl/extensions/.
Am Dienstag, den 27.02.2007, 10:06 +0100 schrieb Marcus Better:
> [moving discussion to debian-java list]
Ok. I'm not subscribed to the debian-java list, so please include a CC
to my address if answering from this list
> Daniel Leidert wrote:
>
> > I wanted to ask what you guys think about creat
Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Just in SVN. There is no source-tarball.
But I see the sources for the extensions are contained in the docbook-xsl
tarball (1.72.0), but either they are not in the 1.71 version, or the
sources have been stripped from the Debian tarball (which would be a
mistake, only the j
Am Dienstag, den 27.02.2007, 10:33 +0100 schrieb Daniel Leidert:
> Am Dienstag, den 27.02.2007, 10:06 +0100 schrieb Marcus Better:
> > [moving discussion to debian-java list]
>
> Ok. I'm not subscribed to the debian-java list, so please include a CC
> to my address if answering from this list
I'm
Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Update: The docbook-xsl upstream is willing to release a separate
> (source-)tarball for the extension Java classes
Ok, doesn't make much difference from a packaging perspective though.
Marcus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe
Am Dienstag, den 27.02.2007, 11:20 +0100 schrieb Marcus Better:
> Daniel Leidert wrote:
>
> > Just in SVN. There is no source-tarball.
>
> But I see the sources for the extensions are contained in the docbook-xsl
> tarball (1.72.0), but either they are not in the 1.71 version, or the
> sources ha
Daniel Leidert wrote:
> But if Michael Smith really offers splitting the source, I would prefer
> this way
Very well, please file an RFP and CC me when it is done.
Marcus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 01:48:08PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 27.02.2007, 11:20 +0100 schrieb Marcus Better:
> > Daniel Leidert wrote:
> >
> > > Just in SVN. There is no source-tarball.
> >
> > But I see the sources for the extensions are contained in the docbook-xsl
> > tarb
Hi Michael,
Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kaffe is outdated and needs some serious updates. Its better not to use
> it in current state. The other runtimes are more uptodate.
>
> Sablevm is even more outdated and I dont see anyone working on it at
> all in Debian.
>
> Recommending thos
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 02:02:35PM +, Jörg Sommer wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Kaffe is outdated and needs some serious updates. Its better not to use
> > it in current state. The other runtimes are more uptodate.
> >
> > Sablevm is even more outdated an
Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2007-02-27 11:47 +0100:
> Update: The docbook-xsl upstream is willing to release a separate
> (source-)tarball for the extension Java classes (maybe as
> docbook-xsl-java?).
(I contacted Daniel about this after reading a message he posted
over on the docbook-ap
Hi,
Michael Koch said:
> Recommends are installed by default. People explicitely dont installing
> the recommends and then wondering about broken stuff are on their own.
How do you mean this? Technically, apt-get and aptitude do *not* install
Recommends by default. I read the policy in such a way
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 05:25:33PM +0100, Eric Lavarde - Debian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Michael Koch said:
> > Recommends are installed by default. People explicitely dont installing
> > the recommends and then wondering about broken stuff are on their own.
> How do you mean this? Technically, apt-get an
Michael Koch gmx.de> writes:
>
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 02:02:35PM +, Jörg Sommer wrote:
> > Hi Michael,
> >
> > Michael Koch gmx.de> wrote:
> > > Kaffe is outdated and needs some serious updates. Its better not to use
> > > it in current state. The other runtimes are more uptodate.
> > >
Hello Michael,
Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 02:02:35PM +, Jörg Sommer wrote:
>> Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Kaffe is outdated and needs some serious updates. Its better not to use
>> > it in current state. The other runtimes are more uptoda
Hi,
it's getting off-topic but just to close the thread:
Michael Koch wrote:
aptitude does by default if its not re-configured and its the
recommended tool for the job since sarge.
You're most probably right; I *think* my difference of opinion relies on
the fact that I'm mostly upgrading packa
square miles before being contained Monday. Three firefighters died when the
flames
Critical Care Inc,
symbl: .CTCX.
This one is an easy doubler
@ 65 cents wont last long
Expected target : $ 3.00
Critical Care Announces Expansion of Cost Containment Activities
Business Wire (Fri, Feb 16)
17 matches
Mail list logo
