On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 01:48:08PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 27.02.2007, 11:20 +0100 schrieb Marcus Better: > > Daniel Leidert wrote: > > > > > Just in SVN. There is no source-tarball. > > > > But I see the sources for the extensions are contained in the docbook-xsl > > tarball (1.72.0), but either they are not in the 1.71 version, or the > > sources have been stripped from the Debian tarball (which would be a > > mistake, only the jars should be removed). > > Hm, true. Didn't recognize this. The directory was removed in revision > 1.68.1.dfsg.1-0.1. I simply did the same, when I overtook > maintainership. > > > In any case the natural solution would be to package the latest docbook-xsl, > > and have it build the Java extensions as well. I can probably help with > > this if you like. > > In every case, I would appreciate your help. But if Michael Smith really > offers splitting the source, I would prefer this way and put it into > pkg-java (it's simple - the java guys probably have more knowledge about > Java, saxon and xalan than I have - I have just some basic Java > knowledge).
This makes only real sense when the java part has no dependency on a special version of the non-java docbook-xsl. If it has it would be MUCH easier to do it all in one source package. We can help you with this even if its not under the pkg-java umbrella. Michael -- .''`. | Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : | Free Java Developer <http://www.classpath.org> `. `' | `- | 1024D/BAC5 4B28 D436 95E6 F2E0 BD11 5923 A008 2763 483B -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
