Re: Blackdown Java 2 copyright (j2sdk, j2se)

2001-10-07 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, Oct 07, 2001 at 08:44:27PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote: > Scripsit James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > One interesting thing I did see was in the Sun Supplemental License > > terms, point 2: > > > | (iii) you do not distribute additional software intended to replace > > | any compon

Reg: EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION on JDBC in Java!!!!

2001-10-07 Thread JAVA TEAM
HI, Software Environment An Intranet based application has been developed by our organization using JAVA, JSP and Java Script initially in JDK 1.2.2 and later upgraded to JDK 1.3.1 This application is being run on Windows NT 4.0 platform. The Web Server being used is Apache 1.3.20 for Windows

Re: Blackdown Java 2 copyright (j2sdk, j2se)

2001-10-07 Thread Peter Makholm
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I was under the impression from the discussions this spring that the > Blackdown folks had got explicit permission from Sun for Debian to > distribute the JDK in non-free. If such permission exists it should be mentioned in the packages copyright file.

Re: Blackdown Java 2 copyright (j2sdk, j2se)

2001-10-07 Thread Egon Willighagen
On Monday 08 October 2001 08:17, Peter Makholm wrote: > Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I was under the impression from the discussions this spring that the > > Blackdown folks had got explicit permission from Sun for Debian to > > distribute the JDK in non-free. > > If such permissio