On Sun, Oct 07, 2001 at 08:44:27PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote: > Scripsit James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > One interesting thing I did see was in the Sun Supplemental License > > terms, point 2: > > > | (iii) you do not distribute additional software intended to replace > > | any component(s) of the Software > > > Since we actually do this[1] albeit not in the same package, does this > > disqualify us from putting it in non-free? > > Sun would probably think so. Thus it does.
I was under the impression from the discussions this spring that the Blackdown folks had got explicit permission from Sun for Debian to distribute the JDK in non-free. Somebody on -java is likely to know for sure. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
