Re: repackaging, git, version suffix

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thomas Koch wrote: > Now I saw, that in the eclipse GIT repository[3] there's one tag > upstream/3.5.1 and another one upstream/3.5.1+repack. I don't know, > whether the eclipse package is doing so, but we could standardize on: > > - import the upstre

Re: repackaging, git, version suffix

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thomas Koch wrote: > - Should all java stuff be repackaged? For example the xmlenc upstream > tarball contains only one jar and some docs. I could as well have removed > these files during package building. You must remove any jars that are not built

repackaging, git, version suffix

With xmlenc[1] and my work on SOLR[2], I filtered out all .jar and pregenerated docs coming from upstream when importing to GIT. So the upstream tarball gets repackaged. Now I saw, that in the eclipse GIT repository[3] there's one tag upstream/3.5.1 and another one upstream/3.5.1+repack. I don'