On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Jan-Pascal van
Best wrote:
> Torsten Werner wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Vincent Fourmond
>> wrote:
>>> I'm wondering: would it be a good idea to remove everything but to
>>> leave a dummy file in pkg-java/trunk/solr stating that the packaging
>>>
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Jan-Pascal van
Best wrote:
> It seems like 'old' contains 'old packages', that aren't maintained
> anymore. Moving solr there would suggest that Debian packaging of solr
> has halted. I would prefer Vincent's suggestion. What do others think?
sounds reasonable
C
Torsten Werner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
>
>> I'm wondering: would it be a good idea to remove everything but to
>> leave a dummy file in pkg-java/trunk/solr stating that the packaging
>> has been moved to a git repository ?
>>
> I recommend
Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> Absolutely. We don't want two different repositories for one
> package. Make sure to update the Vcs-* fields.
>
> I'm wondering: would it be a good idea to remove everything but to
> leave a dummy file in pkg-java/trunk/solr stating that the packaging
> has been moved
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> I'm wondering: would it be a good idea to remove everything but to
> leave a dummy file in pkg-java/trunk/solr stating that the packaging
> has been moved to a git repository ?
I recommend moving such packages from trunk to old not
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Jan-Pascal van
Best wrote:
> Now for the next step: should I remove all files from SVN in
> pkg-java/trunk/solr with a commit message that says where the repository
> has been moved?
Absolutely. We don't want two different repositories for one
package. Make sure
Hi all,
I've bitten the bullet and converted the solr work in the pkg-java svn
to a new git (central) repository. There was already a directory
/git/pkg-java on Alioth; I've created a solr.git repository beneath it.
The process following
http://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/Git#ConvertaSVNAliothreposit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jan-Pascal van Best wrote:
> I've received a request (see below) to move the packaging of solr to a
> git repository.
Just FYI: I use git+TopGit for packaging testng, you may "debcheckout" it
if you want to have a look. Works pretty well so far. (Ad
Hello,
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Jan-Pascal van
Best wrote:
> I've received a request (see below) to move the packaging of solr to a
> git repository. Solr is currently maintained in the pkg-java subversion
> repository. In my opinion, this is as is should be: pkg-java is a team
> effort
Hi,
- Why GIT and not HG, BZR, ...
- Bzr is crap, so Hg remains
- http://upsilon.cc/~zack/stuff/vcs-usage
- KDE, Gnome, Kernel, freedesktop.org, Fedora, Perl5, GNU auto..., Ruby,
YUI, hosting at sourceforge ...
- would GIT make it harder to get new contributors?
- It would lower the b
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Torsten Werner wrote:
> Hi Jan-Pascal,
>
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Jan-Pascal van
> Best wrote:
>> Any thoughts from the team?
>
> I would really love to convert out svn repo to git and even volunteer
> in doing the actual conversion.
>
> BUT!
>
> The numb
Hi Jan-Pascal,
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Jan-Pascal van
Best wrote:
> Any thoughts from the team?
I would really love to convert out svn repo to git and even volunteer
in doing the actual conversion.
BUT!
The number of active team members is really too low. I think that git
would make i
Dear all,
I've received a request (see below) to move the packaging of solr to a
git repository. Solr is currently maintained in the pkg-java subversion
repository. In my opinion, this is as is should be: pkg-java is a team
effort, and the results of that effort are maintained in the pkg-java
svn.
13 matches
Mail list logo
