Hi
On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 03:31:14PM -0500, Joe Phillips wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-11-02 at 07:43, Mario Joussen wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 12:07:53PM -0500, Joe Phillips wrote:
> > > I chose to package 2.0 (as opposed to 2.1) as it is documented to work
> > > with Java CommAPI. I have succe
Hi
On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 03:31:14PM -0500, Joe Phillips wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-11-02 at 07:43, Mario Joussen wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 12:07:53PM -0500, Joe Phillips wrote:
> > > I chose to package 2.0 (as opposed to 2.1) as it is documented to work
> > > with Java CommAPI. I have succe
On Sat, 2002-11-02 at 07:43, Mario Joussen wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 12:07:53PM -0500, Joe Phillips wrote:
> > I chose to package 2.0 (as opposed to 2.1) as it is documented to work
> > with Java CommAPI. I have successfully used my package with some
> > CommAPI software already.
>
> But t
On Sat, 2002-11-02 at 07:43, Mario Joussen wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 12:07:53PM -0500, Joe Phillips wrote:
> > I chose to package 2.0 (as opposed to 2.1) as it is documented to work
> > with Java CommAPI. I have successfully used my package with some
> > CommAPI software already.
>
> But t
Mario,
I've packaged the latest 2.0 series rxtx software for debian stable.
The package passes lintian. You can find my binary and source packages
at http://www.innovationsw.com/~jaiger/downloads/debian/
The only issues I see with the package, relative to your 1.5preX
package, is that it may be
Mario,
I've packaged the latest 2.0 series rxtx software for debian stable.
The package passes lintian. You can find my binary and source packages
at http://www.innovationsw.com/~jaiger/downloads/debian/
The only issues I see with the package, relative to your 1.5preX
package, is that it may be
6 matches
Mail list logo
