Hello Andrew,
Le lundi 28 avril 2008 à 09:44 -0400, Andrew Overholt a écrit :
> This sounds like "rpmstubby" (name can be changed no problem) which I
> hacked up very quickly to "stub" out an RPM specfile from Eclipse plugin
> feature.xml files. It's very rough but it holds potential. I'd really
Hi,
On Sun, 2008-04-27 at 13:23 +0200, Thomas Girard wrote:
> Also I wonder whether it would be feasible to use Eclipse
> plugins metainformation to automate part of the Debian packaging
> effort.
This sounds like "rpmstubby" (name can be changed no problem) which I
hacked up very quickly to "stu
Hello,
this email summarizes Eclipse current status. A work is in progress to
update existing packages. These are must-have.
Besides these, that are a lot of others packages that could be
packaged. Some of them are available in Fedora already[8]. Fedora
people have developped Eclipse packaging to
On 17.12.05 16:45:08, Stephan Michels wrote:
> On 12/17/05, Andreas Pakulat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 17.12.05 14:46:52, Stephan Michels wrote:
> > > On 12/17/05, Andreas Pakulat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
> > > > > > org.tigris.subversio
On 12/17/05, Andreas Pakulat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 17.12.05 14:46:52, Stephan Michels wrote:
> > On 12/17/05, Andreas Pakulat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
> > > > > org.tigris.subversion.javahl.SVNClient not found in
> > > > > gnu.gcj.runtim
On 17.12.05 14:46:52, Stephan Michels wrote:
> On 12/17/05, Andreas Pakulat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
> > > > org.tigris.subversion.javahl.SVNClient not found in
> > > > gnu.gcj.runtime.SystemClassLoader{urls=[file:/usr/lib/eclipse/startup.jar],
> > >
On 17.12.05 15:47:15, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 2005-12-17 at 16:35 +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
> > > Also the generics don't work when using the java-gcj-compat VM as you
> > > suggested for beeing able to use ecj as compiler.
> >
> > All language extensions from Java 5.0 work with G
Hi,
On Sat, 2005-12-17 at 16:35 +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
> > Also the generics don't work when using the java-gcj-compat VM as you
> > suggested for beeing able to use ecj as compiler.
>
> All language extensions from Java 5.0 work with GCJ 4.0. The main problem
> is just that you cant use the
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 02:36:22PM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 17.12.05 14:47:11, Michael Koch wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 01:26:07PM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > > On 17.12.05 13:54:55, Michael Koch wrote:
> > > Anyway, somethings not working here as expected. Having
> > > JAVA_
On 12/17/05, Andreas Pakulat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.tigris.subversion.javahl.SVNClient
> > > not found in
> > > gnu.gcj.runtime.SystemClassLoader{urls=[file:/usr/lib/eclipse/startup.jar],
> > > parent=gnu.gcj.runtime.ExtensionClassLoader{urls=[],
On 17.12.05 14:47:11, Michael Koch wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 01:26:07PM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > On 17.12.05 13:54:55, Michael Koch wrote:
> > Anyway, somethings not working here as expected. Having
> > JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/jvm/java/gcj is _much_ slower (in startup) than using
> > SUN
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 01:26:07PM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 17.12.05 13:54:55, Michael Koch wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 12:42:36PM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > > > Only when using GCJ to run Eclipse and eclipse-ecj-gcj is installed.
> > >
> > > Ok, got that installed.
> > >
On 17.12.05 13:54:55, Michael Koch wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 12:42:36PM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > > Only when using GCJ to run Eclipse and eclipse-ecj-gcj is installed.
> >
> > Ok, got that installed.
> >
> > > Eclipse just calls the main ECJ class inside itself and SUN is not
> >
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 12:42:36PM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > Only when using GCJ to run Eclipse and eclipse-ecj-gcj is installed.
>
> Ok, got that installed.
>
> > Eclipse just calls the main ECJ class inside itself and SUN is not
> > capable of using the native jars.
>
> Hmm, so when ru
the preferences so that Eclipse uses ecj-gcj to
> > compile java classes?
>
> Only when using GCJ to run Eclipse and eclipse-ecj-gcj is installed.
Ok, got that installed.
> Eclipse just calls the main ECJ class inside itself and SUN is not
> capable of using the native jars.
Hm
is no other way to use the native ECJ from within eclipse.
Eclipse just calls the main ECJ class inside itself and SUN is not
capable of using the native jars.
> > > 2. Those eclipse-* packages that have a eclipse-*-gcj counterpart: Is
> > > the gcj-version (i.e. natively compi
m 5.0 but no language extensions.
> GCJ can produce bytecode OR native code. ECJ can only produce bytecode.
> A natively compiled ECJ is mostly faster in producing byecode than GCJ.
Hmm, how could I benefit from ecj from within eclipse? I mean, what do I
need to change in the preferences so
y compiled ECJ is mostly faster in producing byecode than GCJ.
> 2. Those eclipse-* packages that have a eclipse-*-gcj counterpart: Is
> the gcj-version (i.e. natively compiled plugins) faster? What are their
> benefit above the normal variant?
When running eclipse with GCJ eclipse is much
r as "pure-java-version" (via eclipse-ecj) or as
native binary (via eclipse-ecj-gcj). What benefits has ecj above gcj?
2. Those eclipse-* packages that have a eclipse-*-gcj counterpart: Is
the gcj-version (i.e. natively compiled plugins) faster? What are their
benefit above the normal va
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 07:03:05PM +0400, Ivan S. Dubrov wrote:
> Do not know there to post, so I post here.
>
> Eclipse 3.1 packages (from http://www.backports.org/~mkoch/) contain a bug -
> the plugin org.apache.ant is missing libraries (like ant-jai.jar, etc), but
> MANIFEST.MF of the org.apa
Do not know there to post, so I post here.
Eclipse 3.1 packages (from http://www.backports.org/~mkoch/) contain a bug -
the plugin org.apache.ant is missing libraries (like ant-jai.jar, etc), but
MANIFEST.MF of the org.apache.ant have them in the classpath. This leads to the
following error whe
Hallo Laszlo,
* Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
> Anyway, a group of people may be better than one maintaining it.
Yes, thats true!
> Just looking into it; well, your rules should use a tab character
>before "# Lets install next to the old version" instead of spaces.
Arg, that was on of the las
Hi,
* Jan Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-09-19 11:58:11 +0200]:
> Real life got me and right now I'm not able to do a proper packaging
> of eclipse3. I'm also not that much interested in the moment in java
> packages as I'm not anymore working as a java programmer.
Well, this is true for me as
ard to figure out the dependencies. Send a patch, if you
want that added again.
. droped java 1.3 in the eclipse packages: it's not supported anymore.
libswt still depends on java2-runtime.
. eclipse3.0-java does not anymore contain any plugins, only the things
needed to cal
Jan Schulz wrote:
Hallo!
Hallo Jan,
Theoretically (actually: practically) SWT is runable with kaffe, so
swt could be build on other platforms. Eclipse on the other hand will
not run on a current kaffe.
Not yet, but Mark Wielaard (I bet you remember him from our policy
discussion) has been playin
Hallo Per,
* Per Bothner wrote:
>However, eclipse will run on gcj:
Yes, I'm aware of that. Unfortunatelly, they use a patched gij/gcj, which
is not available in debian yet (AFAIK, they have a branch, which is
not completly integrated into HEAD yet. At least that was the message
some weeks ago). T
On Wednesday 29 October 2003 18:29, Per Bothner wrote:
> Jan Schulz wrote:
> > Theoretically (actually: practically) SWT is runable with kaffe, so
> > swt could be build on other platforms. Eclipse on the other hand will
> > not run on a current kaffe.
>
> However, eclipse will run on gcj:
> http:/
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 06:26:48PM +0100, Jan Schulz wrote:
> I'm actually not sure, what IBM offers there: They have a JDK for
> "32-bit xSeries (Intel compatible)", "32-bit iSeries/pSeries", "64-bit
> iSeries/pSeries", "31-bit zSeries (S/390)" and "64-bit zSeries (S/390)".
> Maybe someone can en
Jan Schulz wrote:
Theoretically (actually: practically) SWT is runable with kaffe, so
swt could be build on other platforms. Eclipse on the other hand will
not run on a current kaffe.
However, eclipse will run on gcj:
http://sources.redhat.com/eclipse/
http://people.redhat.com/~jhealy/eclipse/
htt
Hallo!
A quick look at my 'update-excuses' [1] showed, that eclipse is currently
hold back because of several issues:
* Some libs, which can't do anything about...
* As there are no autobuilder in contrib, I need to provide the
platform dependend packages for !i386 platforms. I have no idea, how
Hallo!
Replying to myself...
update-alternative is working now. I would be really interested if
anyone experiences failures while starting eclipse. I tried to
workaround any big problems...
Two things are still on my Todo: removing the eclipse binary launcher
as a 'Depends' and removing some 'De
Hallo!
Replying to myself...
update-alternative is working now. I would be really interested if
anyone experiences failures while starting eclipse. I tried to
workaround any big problems...
Two things are still on my Todo: removing the eclipse binary launcher
as a 'Depends' and removing some 'De
Hallo!
I've just uploaded new eclipse source packages to
deb-src http://www.katzien.de/debian/eclipse ./
The changes include the libswt-java ->
(libswt2.1-motif-java|libswt2.1-gtk2-java), libswt2.1-java changes, so
it is likely, that something will fail.
I especially interested in this points:
Hallo!
I've just uploaded new eclipse source packages to
deb-src http://www.katzien.de/debian/eclipse ./
The changes include the libswt-java ->
(libswt2.1-motif-java|libswt2.1-gtk2-java), libswt2.1-java changes, so
it is likely, that something will fail.
I especially interested in this points:
>>>>> "Takashi" == Takashi Okamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Takashi> I built experimental eclipse packages and upload them into following
Takashi> apt-line.
Have you talked to Seth Nickell about this?
I think he was looking at packaging Eclipse for Debi
>>>>> "Takashi" == Takashi Okamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Takashi> I built experimental eclipse packages and upload them into following
Takashi> apt-line.
Have you talked to Seth Nickell about this?
I think he was looking at packaging Eclipse for Debi
Hi forks,
I built experimental eclipse packages and upload them into following
apt-line.
deb http://yamaguch.sytes.net/~tora/tmp/eclipse ./
deb-src http://yamaguch.sytes.net/~tora/tmp/eclipse ./
It's very ugly now but it can be compiled from source and it works. My ec
Hi forks,
I built experimental eclipse packages and upload them into following
apt-line.
deb http://yamaguch.sytes.net/~tora/tmp/eclipse ./
deb-src http://yamaguch.sytes.net/~tora/tmp/eclipse ./
It's very ugly now but it can be compiled from source and it works. My ec
38 matches
Mail list logo
