Re: checkstyle Java library - binary package name

2007-01-15 Thread Barry Hawkins
Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > On 1/11/07, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 06:51:08PM -, Paul Cager wrote: >> > Regarding the packaging of the new upstream version of checkstyle. >> As it >> > is a library, should I rename the binary package to >> libcheckstyle-java,

Re: checkstyle Java library - binary package name

2007-01-12 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
On 1/11/07, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 06:51:08PM -, Paul Cager wrote: > Regarding the packaging of the new upstream version of checkstyle. As it > is a library, should I rename the binary package to libcheckstyle-java, or > would this cause far too many p

Re: checkstyle Java library - binary package name

2007-01-11 Thread Michael Koch
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 06:51:08PM -, Paul Cager wrote: > Regarding the packaging of the new upstream version of checkstyle. As it > is a library, should I rename the binary package to libcheckstyle-java, or > would this cause far too many problems? We discussed this specific case a long time

checkstyle Java library - binary package name

2007-01-11 Thread Paul Cager
Regarding the packaging of the new upstream version of checkstyle. As it is a library, should I rename the binary package to libcheckstyle-java, or would this cause far too many problems? Thanks, Paul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac