Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > On 1/11/07, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 06:51:08PM -0000, Paul Cager wrote: >> > Regarding the packaging of the new upstream version of checkstyle. >> As it >> > is a library, should I rename the binary package to >> libcheckstyle-java, or >> > would this cause far too many problems? >> >> We discussed this specific case a long time ago and this package is >> both: a library and a command. I vote for leaving the name as it is. > > Seconded. > +1; checkstyle definitely falls into that dual-role status we've discussed in the past.
-- Barry Hawkins All Things Computed site: http://www.alltc.com weblog: http://www.yepthatsme.com Registered Linux User #368650 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
