Re: Tomcat 3.3a-2

2002-02-13 Thread Dan Tomalesky
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 10:53:27AM -0500, Dan Tomalesky wrote: >> I was wondering why this latest version of tomcat no longer can depend >> on java-virtual-machine-dummy. > >This was done because the -dummy packages will go away. They are not >built any longer and will be removed from the Debian f

Re: Tomcat 3.3a-2

2002-02-13 Thread Dan Tomalesky
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 10:53:27AM -0500, Dan Tomalesky wrote: >> I was wondering why this latest version of tomcat no longer can depend >> on java-virtual-machine-dummy. > >This was done because the -dummy packages will go away. They are not >built any longer and will be removed from the Debian

Re: Tomcat 3.3a-2

2002-02-13 Thread Stefan Gybas
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 10:53:27AM -0500, Dan Tomalesky wrote: > I was wondering why this latest version of tomcat no longer can depend > on java-virtual-machine-dummy. This was done because the -dummy packages will go away. They are not built any longer and will be removed from the Debian ftp ar

Tomcat 3.3a-2

2002-02-13 Thread Dan Tomalesky
Hi, I was wondering why this latest version of tomcat no longer can depend on java-virtual-machine-dummy. This is the way I have my java setup, and since there is no 'dummy' way to provide java2-runtime, I cannot install tomcat on my newly built machines. Is there another way? I do not want t

Re: Tomcat 3.3a-2

2002-02-13 Thread Stefan Gybas
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 10:53:27AM -0500, Dan Tomalesky wrote: > I was wondering why this latest version of tomcat no longer can depend > on java-virtual-machine-dummy. This was done because the -dummy packages will go away. They are not built any longer and will be removed from the Debian ftp a

Tomcat 3.3a-2

2002-02-13 Thread Dan Tomalesky
Hi, I was wondering why this latest version of tomcat no longer can depend on java-virtual-machine-dummy. This is the way I have my java setup, and since there is no 'dummy' way to provide java2-runtime, I cannot install tomcat on my newly built machines. Is there another way? I do not want