Re: Saxon/Xalan extensions written by Norman Walsh for docbook-xsl

2007-03-01 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Donnerstag, den 01.03.2007, 18:55 +0900 schrieb Michael(tm) Smith: > Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2007-03-01 00:28 +0100: [..] > > The code-base of the extensions also doesn't change very > > often: about 3 commits in 9 years (from what I can see). > > Well, it's a little more often than

Re: Saxon/Xalan extensions written by Norman Walsh for docbook-xsl

2007-03-01 Thread Michael(tm) Smith
Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2007-03-01 00:28 +0100: > Am Dienstag, den 27.02.2007, 15:28 +0100 schrieb Michael Koch: > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 01:48:08PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote: > > [docbook-xsl-java package for the Saxon/Xalan extensions?] > > > In every case, I would appreciate y

Re: Saxon/Xalan extensions written by Norman Walsh for docbook-xsl

2007-02-28 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Dienstag, den 27.02.2007, 15:28 +0100 schrieb Michael Koch: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 01:48:08PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote: [docbook-xsl-java package for the Saxon/Xalan extensions?] > > In every case, I would appreciate your help. But if Michael Smith really > > offers splitting the source,

Re: Saxon/Xalan extensions written by Norman Walsh for docbook-xsl

2007-02-27 Thread Michael Koch
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 01:48:08PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 27.02.2007, 11:20 +0100 schrieb Marcus Better: > > Daniel Leidert wrote: > > > > > Just in SVN. There is no source-tarball. > > > > But I see the sources for the extensions are contained in the docbook-xsl > > tarb

Re: Saxon/Xalan extensions written by Norman Walsh for docbook-xsl

2007-02-27 Thread Marcus Better
Daniel Leidert wrote: > But if Michael Smith really offers splitting the source, I would prefer > this way Very well, please file an RFP and CC me when it is done. Marcus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Saxon/Xalan extensions written by Norman Walsh for docbook-xsl

2007-02-27 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Dienstag, den 27.02.2007, 11:20 +0100 schrieb Marcus Better: > Daniel Leidert wrote: > > > Just in SVN. There is no source-tarball. > > But I see the sources for the extensions are contained in the docbook-xsl > tarball (1.72.0), but either they are not in the 1.71 version, or the > sources ha

Re: Saxon/Xalan extensions written by Norman Walsh for docbook-xsl

2007-02-27 Thread Michael(tm) Smith
Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2007-02-27 11:47 +0100: > Update: The docbook-xsl upstream is willing to release a separate > (source-)tarball for the extension Java classes (maybe as > docbook-xsl-java?). (I contacted Daniel about this after reading a message he posted over on the docbook-ap

Re: Saxon/Xalan extensions written by Norman Walsh for docbook-xsl

2007-02-27 Thread Marcus Better
Daniel Leidert wrote: > Update: The docbook-xsl upstream is willing to release a separate > (source-)tarball for the extension Java classes Ok, doesn't make much difference from a packaging perspective though. Marcus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe

Re: Saxon/Xalan extensions written by Norman Walsh for docbook-xsl

2007-02-27 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Dienstag, den 27.02.2007, 10:33 +0100 schrieb Daniel Leidert: > Am Dienstag, den 27.02.2007, 10:06 +0100 schrieb Marcus Better: > > [moving discussion to debian-java list] > > Ok. I'm not subscribed to the debian-java list, so please include a CC > to my address if answering from this list I'm

Re: Saxon/Xalan extensions written by Norman Walsh for docbook-xsl

2007-02-27 Thread Marcus Better
Daniel Leidert wrote: > Just in SVN. There is no source-tarball. But I see the sources for the extensions are contained in the docbook-xsl tarball (1.72.0), but either they are not in the 1.71 version, or the sources have been stripped from the Debian tarball (which would be a mistake, only the j

Re: Saxon/Xalan extensions written by Norman Walsh for docbook-xsl

2007-02-27 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Dienstag, den 27.02.2007, 10:06 +0100 schrieb Marcus Better: > [moving discussion to debian-java list] Ok. I'm not subscribed to the debian-java list, so please include a CC to my address if answering from this list > Daniel Leidert wrote: > > > I wanted to ask what you guys think about creat

Re: Saxon/Xalan extensions written by Norman Walsh for docbook-xsl

2007-02-27 Thread Marcus Better
[moving discussion to debian-java list] Daniel Leidert wrote: > I wanted to ask what you guys think about creating a package for just > the extensions Norman Walsh wrote for docbook-xsl. The Java-classes can > be found at > http://docbook.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/docbook/trunk/xsl/extensions/.