On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:50:38AM +0200, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 08:52:02AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> > BTW, I spended another thought on this license and that it is definitely
> > not applicable: Assume someone would plan a murder using software XY
> > which is fo
Le 5/30/12 9:33 AM, Alexandre Rossi a écrit :
> Hi,
>
>> I've already seen this library, but it is not a compatible API.
>> I gonna ask to biojava team if they would go to using such library
>> instead of org.json one...
> For what it's worth, from the work I've begun doing on GWT, which had
> t
Hi,
> I've already seen this library, but it is not a compatible API.
> I gonna ask to biojava team if they would go to using such library
> instead of org.json one...
For what it's worth, from the work I've begun doing on GWT, which had
the same problem among others, I settled using json-simple
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 08:18:59AM +0200, olivier.sal...@codeless.fr wrote:
> Would be too bad I expect that upstream will take into account my
> request to use a free one.
> In the meanwhile, I could deliver biojava without the library
> biojava3-ws (web service) which is the only one impacted
Le 5/29/12 4:44 PM, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 04:25:51PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> On 2012-05-29 15:46, Paul Wise wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>
The short summary seems to be: We need to contact the authors and I hope
somebody will be willing to take his time on it.
>
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 04:25:51PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2012-05-29 15:46, Paul Wise wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> >> The short summary seems to be: We need to contact the authors and I hope
> >> somebody will be willing to take his time on it.
> >
> > Indeed.
>
> Most likely, that would be
On 2012-05-29 15:46, Paul Wise wrote:
> [...]
>
>> The short summary seems to be: We need to contact the authors and I hope
>> somebody will be willing to take his time on it.
>
> Indeed.
Most likely, that would be a waste of time[1]
~Niels
[1]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-lega
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 08:31:46PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>>
>> The definition of "evil" is subjective and could refer to anything,
>> including the production of Debian itself.
>
> Sure and a statement like the given one is pure non-sense wi
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 08:31:46PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>
> The definition of "evil" is subjective and could refer to anything,
> including the production of Debian itself.
Sure and a statement like the given one is pure non-sense without any
definition and its just a matter if you care about
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I'd call this an "over-picky" interpretation of something that rather
> qualifies as a joke rather than a license which can be dealt with in
> court (disclaimer: I'm not a lawyer, just try to apply common sense.)
>
> I'd like to answer this k
On 29/05/12 14:17, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 02:03:27PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
On 2012-05-29 13:59, Olivier Sallou wrote:
Hi, biojava3 makes use of json.org library. this library is not
packaged in Debian. After a google, I saw old posts saying that
library is (was?) no
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 02:03:27PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2012-05-29 13:59, Olivier Sallou wrote:
> > Hi,
> > biojava3 makes use of json.org library.
> > this library is not packaged in Debian. After a google, I saw old posts
> > saying that library is (was?) not compliant regarding its
On 2012-05-29 13:59, Olivier Sallou wrote:
> Hi,
> biojava3 makes use of json.org library.
> this library is not packaged in Debian. After a google, I saw old posts
> saying that library is (was?) not compliant regarding its license [0].
> Though, after a quick look on their web site I do not see
13 matches
Mail list logo
