On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > I'd call this an "over-picky" interpretation of something that rather > qualifies as a joke rather than a license which can be dealt with in > court (disclaimer: I'm not a lawyer, just try to apply common sense.) > > I'd like to answer this kind of joke at maximum by a comment in > debian/copyright and simply define that using Debian is per definition > not evil (which solves you second problem of a missing definition to > some extend.) > > Did anybody discussed this at debian-legal or with ftpmaster?
This license pops up on debian-legal quite a bit over the years, in every case the debian-legal participants agreed it is non-free. Google consider it non-free enough to reject it from Google Code. The definition of "evil" is subjective and could refer to anything, including the production of Debian itself. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caktje6ez2ciet6akao202a9pcgcmszazsz4xuxkucrgruur...@mail.gmail.com
