Re: jmol: diff for NMU version 12.2.32+dfsg2-1.1

2016-12-11 Thread Ximin Luo
+Vincent, the jalview maintainer Andreas Tille: > On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 03:37:00PM +, Ximin Luo wrote: >> [..] >> >> That depends on what DebiChem, Debian Med, and the Debian Java Team >> collectively want. >> >> jmol has three reverse dependencies. The new upload, jmol 14, breaks all of >

Re: jmol: diff for NMU version 12.2.32+dfsg2-1.1

2016-12-10 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 03:37:00PM +, Ximin Luo wrote: > tony mancill: > > [..] > > > > This upload was rejected due to a lintian error that existed in the > > source package before I added the patch. Since NMUs are supposed to > > be very targeted, the rejection puts us in an odd place.

Re: jmol: diff for NMU version 12.2.32+dfsg2-1.1

2016-12-10 Thread tony mancill
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 03:38:00PM +, Ximin Luo wrote: > +debian-science-sagemath as well > > Ximin Luo: > > tony mancill: > >> [..] > >> > >> This upload was rejected due to a lintian error that existed in the > >> source package before I added the patch. Since NMUs are supposed to > >> be v

Re: jmol: diff for NMU version 12.2.32+dfsg2-1.1

2016-12-10 Thread Ximin Luo
+debian-science-sagemath as well Ximin Luo: > tony mancill: >> [..] >> >> This upload was rejected due to a lintian error that existed in the >> source package before I added the patch. Since NMUs are supposed to >> be very targeted, the rejection puts us in an odd place. Will the >> upload to e

Re: jmol: diff for NMU version 12.2.32+dfsg2-1.1

2016-12-10 Thread Ximin Luo
tony mancill: > [..] > > This upload was rejected due to a lintian error that existed in the > source package before I added the patch. Since NMUs are supposed to > be very targeted, the rejection puts us in an odd place. Will the > upload to experimental [1] find its way into unstable before th