Re: JDK Mission Control

On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 04:40:43PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > Is anyone working on packaging this tool? Upstream is here: > > > Not yet, but I do use it regularly (currently using the binaries publis

Re: JDK 10 Early Access b33 and JDK 8u162 Early Access b03 are available on jdk.java.net

On 13.12.2017 11:13, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: Hi Dalibor, Le 01/12/2017 à 11:12, dalibor topic a écrit : That won't work with 10 either, unfortunately, since the old doclet has (finally) been removed. Please see https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8177511 for details. There is an undocum

Re: JDK 10 Early Access b33 and JDK 8u162 Early Access b03 are available on jdk.java.net

Hi Dalibor, Le 01/12/2017 à 11:12, dalibor topic a écrit : > That won't work with 10 either, unfortunately, since the old doclet has > (finally) been removed. Please see > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8177511 for details. There is an undocumented --ignore-source-errors flag in javado

Re: JDK 10 Early Access b33 and JDK 8u162 Early Access b03 are available on jdk.java.net

On 30.11.2017 15:08, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: If there is no hurry to remove javah I suggest waiting until JDK 12 to do so, this would increase our chances to include JDK 11 in the next Debian release. I don't think that hurry is necessarily a factor here, given that javah would have been depreca

Re: JDK 10 Early Access b33 and JDK 8u162 Early Access b03 are available on jdk.java.net

On 30.11.2017 14:42, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: Le 30/11/2017 à 10:27, dalibor topic a écrit : Thanks, Emmanuel - in many of these cases (AspectJ, ICU, Spotbugs, Gradle, Scala) the way forward seems to be to upgrade the packaged software to the latest upstream version supporting JDK 9, often thank

Re: JDK 10 Early Access b33 and JDK 8u162 Early Access b03 are available on jdk.java.net

Le 29/11/2017 à 14:32, dalibor topic a écrit : > Does java-package work for JDK 10 EA builds? Not yet but it definitely will. > An alternative to javah has been available with the -h flag for javac since > JDK 8 Great, so we can start the transition now. It might be nice to add some examples

Re: JDK 10 Early Access b33 and JDK 8u162 Early Access b03 are available on jdk.java.net

Le 30/11/2017 à 10:27, dalibor topic a écrit : > Thanks, Emmanuel - in many of these cases (AspectJ, ICU, Spotbugs, > Gradle, Scala) the way forward seems to be to upgrade the packaged > software to the latest upstream version supporting JDK 9, often thanks > to the patches provided by Chris West

Re: JDK 10 Early Access b33 and JDK 8u162 Early Access b03 are available on jdk.java.net

On 29.11.2017 14:22, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: Le 29/11/2017 à 13:30, dalibor topic a écrit : I think what makes Debian GNU/Linux interesting for us regarding the OpenJDK Quality Outreach is that it's one of the first Linux distributions to do mass rebuilds of its (quite substantial) package archiv

Re: JDK 10 Early Access b33 and JDK 8u162 Early Access b03 are available on jdk.java.net

On 29.11.2017 12:46, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: Le 29/11/2017 à 10:32, dalibor topic a écrit : I'd agree with Matthias that the binaries of some builds are not by themselves newsworthy for the debian-java mailing list specifically, since Debian doesn't use third party binaries in its Java packagin

Re: JDK 10 Early Access b33 and JDK 8u162 Early Access b03 are available on jdk.java.net

Le 29/11/2017 à 13:30, dalibor topic a écrit : > I think what makes Debian GNU/Linux interesting for us regarding the > OpenJDK Quality Outreach is that it's one of the first Linux > distributions to do mass rebuilds of its (quite substantial) package > archive with JDK 9. So it has the means and

Re: JDK 10 Early Access b33 and JDK 8u162 Early Access b03 are available on jdk.java.net

On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 12:46:20PM +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 29/11/2017 à 10:32, dalibor topic a écrit : > > If not, then I'd suggest stopping further early access announcements > > mails to this mailing list, Rory, and sending them to Emmanuel directly > > instead, while anyone else intere

Re: JDK 10 Early Access b33 and JDK 8u162 Early Access b03 are available on jdk.java.net

On 29.11.2017 10:20, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: From my experience on other lists also receiving these notifications I know this is a good opportunity to gather and take into account the community feedback. That's the general idea, yeah! A list of FOSS projects participating in the OpenJDK quality

Re: JDK 10 Early Access b33 and JDK 8u162 Early Access b03 are available on jdk.java.net

Le 29/11/2017 à 10:32, dalibor topic a écrit : > I'd agree with Matthias that the binaries of some builds are not by > themselves newsworthy for the debian-java mailing list specifically, > since Debian doesn't use third party binaries in its Java packaging. Actually these binaries can be turned

Re: JDK 10 Early Access b33 and JDK 8u162 Early Access b03 are available on jdk.java.net

I think that as soon as someone objects to having mail sent to a public list, the sending should end. I'd agree with Matthias that the binaries of some builds are not by themselves newsworthy for the debian-java mailing list specifically, since Debian doesn't use third party binaries in its Ja

Re: JDK 10 Early Access b33 and JDK 8u162 Early Access b03 are available on jdk.java.net

Hi Rory, Le 29/11/2017 à 10:01, Rory O'Donnell a écrit : > If you want me to stop sending emails to this list let me know ? I'm personally glad that you send these emails to the debian-java list. They are sent barely once or twice a month and contain useful information. From my experience on oth

Re: JDK 10 Early Access b33 and JDK 8u162 Early Access b03 are available on jdk.java.net

Hi Emmanuel, If you want me to stop sending emails to this list let me know ? Rgds,Rory On 29/11/2017 08:12, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: Le 29/11/2017 à 02:16, Matthias Klose a écrit : is it really necessary to have these advertisements of Oracle's binary only, architecture limited builds on a ma

Re: JDK 10 Early Access b33 and JDK 8u162 Early Access b03 are available on jdk.java.net

Le 29/11/2017 à 02:16, Matthias Klose a écrit : > is it really necessary to have these advertisements of Oracle's binary only, > architecture limited builds on a mailing list of a community project dedicated > to build binaries from sources? I can't find such advertisements on e.g. > mailing list

Re: JDK 10 Early Access b33 and JDK 8u162 Early Access b03 are available on jdk.java.net

Rory, Dalibor, is it really necessary to have these advertisements of Oracle's binary only, architecture limited builds on a mailing list of a community project dedicated to build binaries from sources? I can't find such advertisements on e.g. mailing lists for the Fedora project either. Thanks,

Re: JDK is GPL now! a package in main requested

Hi, On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 09:40 +, Mr. Demeanour wrote: > > See planet.classpath.org . Many of us are really happy about it, and > > have begun playing around with Sun's code. I believe the fun hack for > > today is making cacao work with Sun's ME libraries, there have been a > > few such thin

Re: JDK is GPL now! a package in main requested

Mr. Demeanour jackpot.uk.net> writes: > This is interesting: > "Sun is only releasing what will become java 7 [...]" - I suppose that > remains the case? AFAIK Java 5 remains the most popular Java platform > (excluding J2ME, of course). See http://www.sun.com/software/opensource/java/faq.jsp#b9

Re: JDK is GPL now! a package in main requested

Dalibor Topic wrote: Mr. Demeanour jackpot.uk.net> writes: I shall be most interested to see comments from the CLASSPATH people about this development. See planet.classpath.org . Many of us are really happy about it, and have begun playing around with Sun's code. I believe the fun hack for t

Re: JDK is GPL now! a package in main requested

Mr. Demeanour jackpot.uk.net> writes: > I shall be most interested to see comments from the CLASSPATH people > about this development. See planet.classpath.org . Many of us are really happy about it, and have begun playing around with Sun's code. I believe the fun hack for today is making cacao

Re: JDK is GPL now! a package in main requested

I don't know of this is linked from the openjdk site, but this project exists and at the bottom it mentions GPL. https://javahelp.dev.java.net/ - David Herron On Nov 14, 2006, at 2:23 AM, Ola Lundqvist wrote: Hi It seems like it has not been released as GPL yet. At least not according

Re: JDK is GPL now! a package in main requested

Hi It seems like it has not been released as GPL yet. At least not according to the pages at Sun. Regards, // Ola On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 10:47:57AM +0100, Eric Lavarde - Debian wrote: > Hi, > > > AIUI, all that is becoming GPL as of today is javac and JavaHelp (and > > does someone know wher

Re: JDK is GPL now! a package in main requested

Hi, > AIUI, all that is becoming GPL as of today is javac and JavaHelp (and does someone know where one can pull the GPLed version of JavaHelp? Someone already planning to package it? Someone minding if I'll do it? Thanks, Eric -- You don't need to CC me on debian-java, debian-mentors and pkg-

Re: JDK is GPL now! a package in main requested

Burak Emir wrote: > Would the existing packages be moved to main? Many, perhaps most, of the existing packages in contrib can already be moved to main. It's just a question of migrating them to use GCJ. This is being done slowly, volunteers are welcome to help. Marcus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Re: JDK is GPL now! a package in main requested

pietro ferrari wrote: On 11/13/06, Burak Emir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Java SE (standard edition) comprises a compiler, library, java doc, vm etc., I would speculate. That's what is in the download. no, as it says in the url you sent so far they released the vm, javac and java help. the c

Re: JDK is GPL now! a package in main requested

On 11/13/06, Burak Emir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Java SE (standard edition) comprises a compiler, library, java doc, vm etc., I would speculate. That's what is in the download. no, as it says in the url you sent so far they released the vm, javac and java help. the class library will only be

Re: JDK is GPL now! a package in main requested

Mr. Demeanour wrote: pietro ferrari wrote: from lycos news[0] "Sun said it is making nearly all of Java's source code - excluding small pockets of code that aren't owned by Sun - available under the GNU General Public License." and "All the Java source code is expected to be released by Mar

Re: JDK is GPL now! a package in main requested

pietro ferrari wrote: from lycos news[0] "Sun said it is making nearly all of Java's source code - excluding small pockets of code that aren't owned by Sun - available under the GNU General Public License." and "All the Java source code is expected to be released by March 2007". AIUI, all th

Re: JDK is GPL now! a package in main requested

from lycos news[0] "Sun said it is making nearly all of Java's source code - excluding small pockets of code that aren't owned by Sun - available under the GNU General Public License." and "All the Java source code is expected to be released by March 2007". so i guess we will have to wait untill m

Re: jdk 1.4.0_01 on woody

Plus a little screen shot http://alex.dpcgroup.com/~alex/temp/Font.png :) give you the energy to make it work :) Alex Philippe ROSTAING TAYARD 提到: > Hello guys, > > I've just install woody on my Compaq EVO N600c and I use the vesa > driver for the Radeon mobility card. I also install the new jd

Re: jdk 1.4.0_01 on woody

If the backend of your window manager is not supporting anti-alias, that may cause your problem. Have your try kde2 with anti-alias font turn on? It work for me. Good luck Alex Philippe ROSTAING TAYARD 提到: > Hello guys, > > I've just install woody on my Compaq EVO N600c and I use the vesa > driv

Re: jdk 1.4.0_01 on woody

Plus a little screen shot http://alex.dpcgroup.com/~alex/temp/Font.png :) give you the energy to make it work :) Alex Philippe ROSTAING TAYARD ´£¨ì: > Hello guys, > > I've just install woody on my Compaq EVO N600c and I use the vesa > driver for the Radeon mobility card. I also install the new

Re: jdk 1.4.0_01 on woody

If the backend of your window manager is not supporting anti-alias, that may cause your problem. Have your try kde2 with anti-alias font turn on? It work for me. Good luck Alex Philippe ROSTAING TAYARD ´£¨ì: > Hello guys, > > I've just install woody on my Compaq EVO N600c and I use the vesa > d

Re: jdk >= 1.2

On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 09:04:57AM +0100, Nicolas SABOURET wrote: > I intend to package arkanae, a 3D role playing game written in Java and > OpenGL. It requires GL4Java, an OpenGL binding for Java (see > http://www.jausoft.com/gl4java.html). If you haven't already, you should inform the GL4Java

Re: jdk >= 1.2

On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 09:04:57AM +0100, Nicolas SABOURET wrote: > I intend to package arkanae, a 3D role playing game written in Java and > OpenGL. It requires GL4Java, an OpenGL binding for Java (see > http://www.jausoft.com/gl4java.html). If you haven't already, you should inform the GL4Java

Re: jdk >= 1.2

On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Nicolas SABOURET wrote: > Hi, > > I intend to package arkanae, a 3D role playing game written in Java and > OpenGL. It requires GL4Java, an OpenGL binding for Java (see > http://www.jausoft.com/gl4java.html). > Sadly, both programs (arkanae and gl4java) require jdk >= 1.2. > O

Re: jdk >= 1.2

On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Nicolas SABOURET wrote: > Hi, > > I intend to package arkanae, a 3D role playing game written in Java and > OpenGL. It requires GL4Java, an OpenGL binding for Java (see > http://www.jausoft.com/gl4java.html). > Sadly, both programs (arkanae and gl4java) require jdk >= 1.2. >

Re: JDK 1.4.0 Java-Plug-in instability

Rick Lutowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Has anyone else tried an applet with 1.4.0 Java Plug-in (with > or without java3d) in Netscape on debian? Yes (mostly with our 1.4.0 code). Note that there are some problems with Java2 1.4.0 and J3D 1.2.1_03. Until J3D 1.2.1_04 is ready you might want

Re: JDK 1.4.0 Java-Plug-in instability

Rick Lutowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Has anyone else tried an applet with 1.4.0 Java Plug-in (with > or without java3d) in Netscape on debian? Yes (mostly with our 1.4.0 code). Note that there are some problems with Java2 1.4.0 and J3D 1.2.1_03. Until J3D 1.2.1_04 is ready you might want

Re: jdk

Blackdown has 1.3 debian packages. see www.blackdown.org On Tue, 15 May 2001 06:24:47 Mitchell Smith wrote: > > Hi, > > I just went to install jDK on my system here and noticed that the current > version in the Debian distrib > is 1.1. Are there any plans to bring this up to the current version

Re: jdk

Blackdown has 1.3 debian packages. see www.blackdown.org On Tue, 15 May 2001 06:24:47 Mitchell Smith wrote: > > Hi, > > I just went to install jDK on my system here and noticed that the current > version in the Debian distrib > is 1.1. Are there any plans to bring this up to the current versio

Re: JDK 1.2 and above

> Hi, > > does anyone know why JDK/JRE 1.2 and above are not available as > debian-packages? They're available, just maybe not from the normal sources. Just go to www.blackdown.org, then to their download link, then to "debian". You can get JDK/JRE 1.3. Another problem might be that you're not se

Re: JDK 1.2 and above

> Hi, > > does anyone know why JDK/JRE 1.2 and above are not available as > debian-packages? They're available, just maybe not from the normal sources. Just go to www.blackdown.org, then to their download link, then to "debian". You can get JDK/JRE 1.3. Another problem might be that you're not s

Re: JDK 1.2.2RC1 and JServ

On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Spectron International, Inc. wrote: > I have JDK1.2.2 RC1 on a Debian box (potato). I have installed Apache JServ > and I configured everything to run using the JDK1.2.2 and almost all the > servlets are working ok. My problem is that I want to create a GIF from a > servlet.

Re: JDK 1.2.2RC1 and JServ

I don't know if this will fix anything, but try jpeg -- it isn't encumbered by patents, afaik, but .gif is. If jpeg works, then I think you can safely assume .gif won't go. If jpeg doesn't work, then ... :) time for class hth On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 03:03:38PM -0500, Spectron International,

Free javadoc clone (was Re: jdk 1.2)

> P.P.S. I am still looking for a free javadoc implementation. Has anybody found > such a program? I just came across this link today. http://www.zib.de/Visual/software/doc++/ Perhaps you could try this out. Cris J H -- Cris J. Holdorph [EMAIL PROTECTED]