On 2012-02-02 22:41, Jakub Adam wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> This license in itself is discriminating against users, so it has to go
>> in non-free unless we can obtain it under a better license.
>
> for completeness I paste here a link to analysis I got from debian-legal
> [1]
> (nothing much new there). I
Hi,
This license in itself is discriminating against users, so it has to go
in non-free unless we can obtain it under a better license.
for completeness I paste here a link to analysis I got from debian-legal [1]
(nothing much new there). I will try to contact upstream and clarify the
license
On 2012-01-17 22:05, Jakub Adam wrote:
> Hi Niels,
>
>> [...]
>
> Regards,
>
> Jakub
>
>
Hi Jakub,
I checked the license notice in qswt/shared/shared_global_p.h of
eclipse-cdt-qa[1] and found:
"""
/
**
** Copyright
Hi Niels,
I am a bit concerned with the patches here. Particularly
"custom-build.patch" contains a lot of code changes and its
description/subject ("custom-build") is completely unhelpful.
I split that patch into smaller chunks and added some descriptions, see git.
The description of "disab
On 2012-01-12 23:26, Jakub Adam wrote:
> Dear java packagers,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for package "eclipse-cdt-qt".
>
> * Package name: eclipse-cdt-qt
>Version : 1.6.1-1
>Upstream Author : Nokia
> * URL : http://qt.nokia.com/products/eclipse-integration/
>
5 matches
Mail list logo
