Re: RFP: jrockit -- A virtual machine for Java

2004-10-07 Thread Johan Walles
ï-Original Message- From: Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Johan Walles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: debian-java@lists.debian.org Sent: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 17:43:14 +0200 Subject: Re: RFP: jrockit -- A virtual machine for Java Johan Walles wrote: >> ' If the ver

Re: RFP: jrockit -- A virtual machine for Java

2004-10-06 Thread Dalibor Topic
Johan Walles wrote: -Original Message- " This represents "Management Information System." This is generally a system based on a mainframe or minicomputer. Some companies have a department labeled "MIS" that may serve various puposes in the company, generally networking related. " Thanks

Re: RFP: jrockit -- A virtual machine for Java

2004-10-06 Thread Johan Walles
ï-Original Message- From: Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Johan Walles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: debian-java@lists.debian.org Sent: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 15:13:03 +0200 Subject: Re: RFP: jrockit -- A virtual machine for Java Johan Walles wrote: "2 (iii) Distributor may mo

Re: RFP: jrockit -- A virtual machine for Java

2004-10-06 Thread Dalibor Topic
Johan Walles wrote: I've attached the re-distribution license agreement to the RFP at "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=273693";. It's in MS Word format, but it opens fine in OpenOffice. Argh. It's a software license. There is no need to make MS Word files out of it, afaict. Sig

Re: RFP: jrockit -- A virtual machine for Java

2004-10-05 Thread Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi
Hi Johan, * Johan Walles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-10-05 06:42:33 -0700]: > as I wrote in my very first e-mail about JRockit, it's non-free, and > will remain so for the foreseeable future. Thus, the only way it would > enter Debian would be through the non-free part of the Debian distro. > >

Re: RFP: jrockit -- A virtual machine for Java

2004-10-05 Thread Johan Walles
that shouldn't stop it from entering non-free. Regards //Johan -Original Message- From: Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Johan Walles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; debian-java@lists.debian.org Sent: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 15:16:55 +0200 Subj

Re: RFP: jrockit -- A virtual machine for Java

2004-10-05 Thread Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi
* Johan Walles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-10-05 00:46:22 -0700]: > I've attached the re-distribution license agreement to the RFP at > "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=273693";. It's in MS > Word format, but it opens fine in OpenOffice. > > I couldn't spot any show-stoppers in

Re: RFP: jrockit -- A virtual machine for Java

2004-10-05 Thread Johan Walles
ers //Johan -Original Message- From: Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: debian-java@lists.debian.org Sent: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 12:30:04 + (UTC) Subject: Re: RFP: jrockit -- A virtual machine for Java Your first mission, if you chose to accept it, will be to get someone inside B

Re: RFP: jrockit -- A virtual machine for Java

2004-10-04 Thread Johan Walles
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: debian-java@lists.debian.org Sent: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 12:30:04 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: RFP: jrockit -- A virtual machine for Java Johan Walles mailblocks.com> writes: Unforturnately not; it's supposedly available upon request from "jrockit-partner at bea.com&qu

Re: RFP: jrockit -- A virtual machine for Java

2004-10-04 Thread Dalibor Topic
Johan Walles mailblocks.com> writes: > Unforturnately not; it's supposedly available upon request from > "jrockit-partner at bea.com". Thanks for the quick reply, Johan. Your first mission, if you chose to accept it, will be to get someone inside BEA to put up the redistribution license online,

Re: RFP: jrockit -- A virtual machine for Java

2004-10-04 Thread Johan Walles
Unforturnately not; it's supposedly available upon request from "jrockit-partner at bea.com". //Johan -Original Message- From: Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: debian-java@lists.debian.org Sent: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 22:52:21 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: RFP: jrockit --

Re: RFP: jrockit -- A virtual machine for Java

2004-10-03 Thread Dalibor Topic
Johan Walles mailblocks.com> writes: > Even with these limitations, I don't really see how Debian would be > worse off with having JRockit in non-free than without it. Although I > *can* see how you (as a PowerPC user) wouldn't be interested in doing > the packaging . If the license looks an

Re: RFP: jrockit -- A virtual machine for Java

2004-10-01 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Fri, 01 Oct 2004 04:49:31 -0700, Johan Walles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No, it can't be built from sources. The .deb would have to build upon > the binaries shipped by BEA. > > JRockit currently runs on ia32 and ia64. > > Even with these limitat

Re: RFP: jrockit -- A virtual machine for Java

2004-10-01 Thread Johan Walles
n* see how you (as a PowerPC user) wouldn't be interested in doing the packaging :-). Regards //Johan -Original Message- From: Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: debian-java@lists.debian.org Sent: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 12:07:14 +0200 Subject: Re: RFP: jrockit -- A virtual machin

Re: RFP: jrockit -- A virtual machine for Java

2004-10-01 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thu, 30 Sep 2004 08:47:24 -0700, Johan Walles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just filed an RFP (bug 273693) for BEA's JRockit. JRockit is a > non-free virtual machine for Java that fully implements everything that > SUN's VM does. In addition it out

Re: J2SE 1.5.0 release + Re: RFP: jrockit -- A virtual machine for Java

2004-10-01 Thread Johan Walles
--Original Message- From: Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Johan Walles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: debian-java@lists.debian.org Sent: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:27:40 +0200 Subject: J2SE 1.5.0 release + Re: RFP: jrockit -- A virtual machine for Java * Johan Walles &l

J2SE 1.5.0 release + Re: RFP: jrockit -- A virtual machine for Java

2004-09-30 Thread Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi
* Johan Walles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-09-30 08:47:24 -0700]: > First of all, BEA is hunting market share. Everybody knows about SUN's > VM, some people know about IBM's but JRockit is quite unknown. This > might make it possible for Debian to actually negotiate re-distribution > terms with B