Adam C Powell IV writes:
> On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 16:58 +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> > On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 10:23:41AM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > > Greetings,
> > >
> > > My package babel recently closed bug 477845 by changing a build
> > > dependency from java-gcj-compat to default-jdk-
On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 22:46 +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> Dear Adam,
>
> On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 12:23:11PM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > Just curious, what will happen regarding testing transitions in the
> > meantime? And long-term, can I assume that the package will build and
> > transiti
Dear Adam,
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 12:23:11PM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Just curious, what will happen regarding testing transitions in the
> meantime? And long-term, can I assume that the package will build and
> transition as soon as the infrastructure is in place, without another
> uplo
On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 16:58 +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 10:23:41AM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > My package babel recently closed bug 477845 by changing a build
> > dependency from java-gcj-compat to default-jdk-builddep. Unfortunately,
> > this ma
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 10:23:41AM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> My package babel recently closed bug 477845 by changing a build
> dependency from java-gcj-compat to default-jdk-builddep. Unfortunately,
> this made it FTBFS on hppa, s390, arm and alpha, where before it built
> e
5 matches
Mail list logo
