On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 16:58 +0200, Michael Koch wrote: > On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 10:23:41AM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > My package babel recently closed bug 477845 by changing a build > > dependency from java-gcj-compat to default-jdk-builddep. Unfortunately, > > this made it FTBFS on hppa, s390, arm and alpha, where before it built > > everywhere except arm. > > > > What is the right thing to do in this situation? Do I exclude those > > architectures from the package build list? Is there a "java-works" > > architecture variable which will automatically add arches as their java > > implementations work? > > > > [Please CC me in replies.] > > These arches currently dont work, rigth. I"m testing a solution for > this. In general just B-D on default-jdk-builddep is okay.
Thank you. Just curious, what will happen regarding testing transitions in the meantime? And long-term, can I assume that the package will build and transition as soon as the infrastructure is in place, without another upload? -Adam -- GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6 Engineering consulting with open source tools http://www.opennovation.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
