On Tue, Aug 11, 19:42:01 +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> By the way, you forgot to tag the release. Never mind. I will do it.
Oops, sorry about that. thanks for tagging it.
--
Jonny Lamb, UK
jo...@debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsu
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Jonny Lamb wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 13:52:08 +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote:
>> After reading some old mails from 'Barak A. Pearlmutter' when he
>> sponsored my first package and the manpage of svn-buildpackage I
>> figured out what the problem is.
>> I set two propertie
On Tue, Aug 11, 13:52:08 +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> After reading some old mails from 'Barak A. Pearlmutter' when he
> sponsored my first package and the manpage of svn-buildpackage I
> figured out what the problem is.
> I set two properties, svn-bp:origDir and mergeWithUpstream, on debian
> fold
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Jonny Lamb wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 07, 17:01:21 +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote:
>> Is there anything else that needs to be done before this package can
>> be pushed to Debian? The reason I am pushing is that I want to get
>> this package synced from Debian to Ubuntu before f
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Jonny Lamb wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 07, 17:01:21 +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote:
>> Is there anything else that needs to be done before this package can
>> be pushed to Debian? The reason I am pushing is that I want to get
>> this package synced from Debian to Ubuntu before f
On Fri, Aug 07, 17:01:21 +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> Is there anything else that needs to be done before this package can
> be pushed to Debian? The reason I am pushing is that I want to get
> this package synced from Debian to Ubuntu before feature freeze (27th
> August).
NAFAIK. Go go go!
> In
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Jonny Lamb wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 06, 15:38:15 +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote:
>> No. 'cvs export' is like creating a copy of cvs repository without any
>> revision information. So it does not contain any CVS directories.
>> In case of svn, 'svn export' skips .svn directori
On Thu, Aug 06, 15:38:15 +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> No. 'cvs export' is like creating a copy of cvs repository without any
> revision information. So it does not contain any CVS directories.
> In case of svn, 'svn export' skips .svn directories. :-)
Ah, sorry, I read the names the wrong way arou
On Thu, Aug 06, 14:31:50 +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> 2. I am using cvs export instead of cvs chekout in get-orig-source
> target. Not a major change, it just doesn't require any user
> interaction.
Aren't the annoying CVS directories going to appear in upstream
tarballs now then?
--
Jonny Lamb,
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Jonny Lamb wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 06, 14:31:50 +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote:
>> 2. I am using cvs export instead of cvs chekout in get-orig-source
>> target. Not a major change, it just doesn't require any user
>> interaction.
>
> Aren't the annoying CVS directories going
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:45 PM, Jonny Lamb wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 05, 22:31:08 +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote:
>> 1. Remove dfsg from version.
>
> As long as the upstream tarball which is uploaded does not contain any
> non-DFSG files, sure. Perhaps it's just the CVS snapshot with these
> weird files whi
On Wed, Aug 05, 22:31:08 +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> 1. Remove dfsg from version.
As long as the upstream tarball which is uploaded does not contain any
non-DFSG files, sure. Perhaps it's just the CVS snapshot with these
weird files which I removed.
> 2. Use upstream source zip for version 1.5.2
On Wed, Aug 05, 22:14:53 +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> Are you referring to following entry in changelog?
> * debian/rules: Remove unzipsfx executables from orig.tar.gz.
>
> As I said, current upstream (1.5.2) source zip does not contain any
> non-DFSG-Free files. It does not contain any class or
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Jonny Lamb wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 05, 22:14:53 +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote:
>> Are you referring to following entry in changelog?
>> * debian/rules: Remove unzipsfx executables from orig.tar.gz.
>>
>> As I said, current upstream (1.5.2) source zip does not contain any
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Jonny Lamb wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 16:53:10 +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote:
>> 1. Why are we trying to build CVS version instead of latest stable version?
>
> That's what Petter did initially, and I didn't look at what was
> available upstream.
>
>> 2. The version number
On Fri, Jun 26, 16:53:10 +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> 1. Why are we trying to build CVS version instead of latest stable version?
That's what Petter did initially, and I didn't look at what was
available upstream.
> 2. The version number in the changelog says dfsg, but there is no
> readme file j
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> Hi Jonny,
>
> Any update on this? I wish to explore the possibility of using java3d
> as build/runtime dependency for electric [1] [2] when uploading latest
> upstream version. I would like to use latest stable package of java3d
> for this.
>
>
Hi Jonny,
Any update on this? I wish to explore the possibility of using java3d
as build/runtime dependency for electric [1] [2] when uploading latest
upstream version. I would like to use latest stable package of java3d
for this.
[1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/e/electric.html
[2] http://www.s
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Jonny Lamb wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 19:24:13 +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote:
>> Is there any plan to update java3d package to latest upstream version
>> (1.5.2). I saw some packaging changes in SVN but could not find
>> anything from list archives about possible update.
On Tue, Apr 21, 19:24:13 +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> Is there any plan to update java3d package to latest upstream version
> (1.5.2). I saw some packaging changes in SVN but could not find
> anything from list archives about possible update.
I hope to get this updated fairly soonish but exams are
20 matches
Mail list logo
