On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Jonny Lamb<jo...@debian.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 26, 16:53:10 +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote: >> 1. Why are we trying to build CVS version instead of latest stable version? > > That's what Petter did initially, and I didn't look at what was > available upstream. > >> 2. The version number in the changelog says dfsg, but there is no >> readme file justifying the dfsg string in version. I looked at >> upstream source and didn't see any non-DFSG Free files in package. > > The changes are mentioned in the changelog. I guess I should have put > the changes in README.source.
Are you referring to following entry in changelog? * debian/rules: Remove unzipsfx executables from orig.tar.gz. As I said, current upstream (1.5.2) source zip does not contain any non-DFSG-Free files. It does not contain any class or jar files either. >> 3. How about changing the source package name to match the upstream >> tarball name? > > You mean j3d? Yes, But this is not strict requirement as of now. Regards, Onkar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
