Re: RFC - more slightly shonky java packages

2014-04-11 Thread Matthew Vernon
Matthew Vernon writes: > I've uploaded libowasp-antisamy-java and libowasp-esapi-java to > experimental, including their relevant -doc packages. Unless someone > tells me I shouldn't, I'll create git repos for them under pkg-java at > some point in the vaguely-near future. Likewise, I hope to get

Re: RFC - more slightly shonky java packages

2014-03-13 Thread Markus Koschany
Hello, On 12.03.2014 16:50, Matthew Vernon wrote: [...] > I've uploaded libowasp-antisamy-java and libowasp-esapi-java to > experimental, including their relevant -doc packages. Unless someone > tells me I shouldn't, I'll create git repos for them under pkg-java at > some point in the vaguely-near

Re: RFC - more slightly shonky java packages

2014-03-12 Thread Matthew Vernon
Hi, Markus Koschany writes: > If you really intend to maintain all of them for the foreseeable future, > I would start with > > libnot-yet-commons-ssl-java > libowasp-antisamy-java > libowasp-esapi-java > libvt-ldap-java > > and prepare them for experimental not unstable. However libraries sho

Re: RFC - more slightly shonky java packages

2014-02-23 Thread Markus Koschany
Hi Matthew, On 20.02.2014 18:22, Matthew Vernon wrote: [...] > libopensaml2-java_2.6.1-1_all.deb > depends upon > libopenws-java_1.5.1-1_all.deb > depends upon > libxmltooling-java_1.4.2-1_all.deb > [...] > > I'd be interested in comments on all of these - are they good enough to > be pushed int

RFC - more slightly shonky java packages

2014-02-20 Thread Matthew Vernon
Hi, I'm still working on the dependencies for the Shibboleth IdP. I'm not there yet (see recent emails about problems with maven), as I can't persuade mh_make to work on libshib-common-java, but I have built a number of packages, all of which are availble for now from http://www.chiark.greenend.o