Hello,
* Takashi Okamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> * Please provide a directory in /usr/local, where one can install
>> plugins, without the need to put it into /usr/lib/eclipse.
> I think use mpkg-j2sdk to build deb and install it is better.
I'm using the blackdown java builds, instaleld via
Hello,
* Takashi Okamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> * Please provide a directory in /usr/local, where one can install
>> plugins, without the need to put it into /usr/lib/eclipse.
> I think use mpkg-j2sdk to build deb and install it is better.
I'm using the blackdown java builds, instaleld via
From: Jan Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Eclipse2.1RC1 package
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 02:18:18 +0100
> * Please provide a directory in /usr/local, where one can install
> plugins, without the need to put it into /usr/lib/eclipse.
I think use mpkg-j2sdk to build deb and i
From: Jan Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Eclipse2.1RC1 package
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 02:18:18 +0100
> * Please provide a directory in /usr/local, where one can install
> plugins, without the need to put it into /usr/lib/eclipse.
I think use mpkg-j2sdk to build deb and i
Hello,
* Takashi Okamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I uploaded new eclipse package. Please check here:
> But I think it's optional and it's the time to upload eclipse
> into sid. If you don't think so, please give me comments.
I used 'apt-get source -b eclipse' to build the packages for my
wood
Hello,
* Takashi Okamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I uploaded new eclipse package. Please check here:
> But I think it's optional and it's the time to upload eclipse
> into sid. If you don't think so, please give me comments.
I used 'apt-get source -b eclipse' to build the packages for my
wood
From: Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Eclipse2.1RC1 package
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 08:37:07 +0100 (CET)
> | I don't have G3:( Please give error message. I may help you.
>
> Can not execute binary file (?) (maybe not the exact sentence but the
> idea is here
From: Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Eclipse2.1RC1 package
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 08:37:07 +0100 (CET)
> | I don't have G3:( Please give error message. I may help you.
>
> Can not execute binary file (?) (maybe not the exact sentence but the
> idea is here
* Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you point me where I can get some documentation on how to do that
> (or what command I have to do)... do I have to get the
> gtk-dev-something packages?
http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/index.cgi/~checkout~/platform-swt-home/faq.html
But it is not r
* Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you point me where I can get some documentation on how to do that
> (or what command I have to do)... do I have to get the
> gtk-dev-something packages?
http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/index.cgi/~checkout~/platform-swt-home/faq.html
But it is not r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
___
/ Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| The PPC stuff I did was really just playing around. I don't think I
| made any changes at all to do that, just rebuilt the .so.
Can you point me wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
___
/ Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| The PPC stuff I did was really just playing around. I don't think I
| made any changes at all to do that, just rebuilt the .so.
Can you point me wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
___
/ Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > "Jan" == Jan Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| > AFAIK the only problem should be the swt library and I thought
| > that this depends on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
___
/ Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > "Jan" == Jan Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| > AFAIK the only problem should be the swt library and I thought
| > that this depends on
> "Jan" == Jan Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tom> However, note that SWT is not 64-bit clean. So certain ports
Tom> will be very difficult.
Jan> File Bugs :) If I read your email right, you're (-> your
Jan> firm..) actually a member of the eclipse board, so ... :))
The SWT maintainers
> "Jan" == Jan Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tom> However, note that SWT is not 64-bit clean. So certain ports
Tom> will be very difficult.
Jan> File Bugs :) If I read your email right, you're (-> your
Jan> firm..) actually a member of the eclipse board, so ... :))
The SWT maintainers
Hello Tom,
Sorry for the personal mail, didn't see, that the list was
included as well.
* Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[swt]
> Porting to PPC should be very easy. I've built it (the one from
> Eclipse 2.0.1) on my PPC box but I've never actually tested it.
> However, note that SWT is no
> "Jan" == Jan Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jan> AFAIK the only problem should be the swt library and I thought that
Jan> this depends on gtk or motiv and both should be availible on linux,
Jan> doesn't matter, which platform.
Jan> Anyway, If it is not possible to build swt on linux/ppc
Hello Tom,
Sorry for the personal mail, didn't see, that the list was
included as well.
* Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[swt]
> Porting to PPC should be very easy. I've built it (the one from
> Eclipse 2.0.1) on my PPC box but I've never actually tested it.
> However, note that SWT is no
> "Jan" == Jan Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jan> AFAIK the only problem should be the swt library and I thought that
Jan> this depends on gtk or motiv and both should be availible on linux,
Jan> doesn't matter, which platform.
Jan> Anyway, If it is not possible to build swt on linux/ppc
* Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you know if there is (or will be) a port of your package (or of
> eclipse) for linux ppc?
AFAIK the only problem should be the swt library and I thought that
this depends on gtk or motiv and both should be availible on linux,
doesn't matter, which p
* Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you know if there is (or will be) a port of your package (or of
> eclipse) for linux ppc?
AFAIK the only problem should be the swt library and I thought that
this depends on gtk or motiv and both should be availible on linux,
doesn't matter, which p
From: Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Eclipse2.1RC1 package
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 12:58:07 +0100 (CET)
> I'll try your new package (I already have an older) on my x86 desktop
> at work, but I have a G3 at home (with debian)... I can't build
> Eclipse fro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
___
/ Takashi Okamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I uploaded new eclipse package.
Do you know if there is (or will be) a port of your package (or of
eclipse) for linux ppc?
I'll try your new p
From: Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Eclipse2.1RC1 package
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 12:58:07 +0100 (CET)
> I'll try your new package (I already have an older) on my x86 desktop
> at work, but I have a G3 at home (with debian)... I can't build
> Eclipse fro
Hello,
* Takashi Okamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I uploaded new eclipse package. Please check here:
> deb http://yamaguch.sytes.net/~tora/tmp/eclipse/ ./
I just had a look at the package file there (It isn'T sundy yet,
where I have free net access...) and I'm wondering, whether the
pde envi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
___
/ Takashi Okamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I uploaded new eclipse package.
Do you know if there is (or will be) a port of your package (or of
eclipse) for linux ppc?
I'll try your new p
Hello,
* Takashi Okamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I uploaded new eclipse package. Please check here:
> deb http://yamaguch.sytes.net/~tora/tmp/eclipse/ ./
I just had a look at the package file there (It isn'T sundy yet,
where I have free net access...) and I'm wondering, whether the
pde envi
> "Takashi" == Takashi Okamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Takashi> But I think it's optional and it's the time to upload
Takashi> eclipse into sid. If you don't think so, please give me
Takashi> comments.
Go for it (don't forget to close my ITP)!
--
Stephen
I love catnip mice
I
> "Takashi" == Takashi Okamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Takashi> But I think it's optional and it's the time to upload
Takashi> eclipse into sid. If you don't think so, please give me
Takashi> comments.
Go for it (don't forget to close my ITP)!
--
Stephen
I love catnip mice
I
Hi,
I uploaded new eclipse package. Please check here:
deb http://yamaguch.sytes.net/~tora/tmp/eclipse/ ./
These package still have following workaround:
+ update manager should install plugin into /var/lib or HOME/eclipse.
+ support motif bingings for SWT.
But I think it's optional and it'
Hi,
I uploaded new eclipse package. Please check here:
deb http://yamaguch.sytes.net/~tora/tmp/eclipse/ ./
These package still have following workaround:
+ update manager should install plugin into /var/lib or HOME/eclipse.
+ support motif bingings for SWT.
But I think it's optional and it'
32 matches
Mail list logo
