inux in labs
> (Debian GNU/Linux unstable). For several reasons, we decided to go with
> java-package and Sun's original releases, despite their being
> non-free. So we're not immediately impacted by this or that packaging of
> Eclipse 3.x not running on, say, Kaffe or S
e and Sun's original releases, despite their being
non-free. So we're not immediately impacted by this or that packaging
of Eclipse 3.x not running on, say, Kaffe or SableVM.
However, the eclipse-xxx (mostly -sdk and -jdt) in unstable/main are
still on 2.1.3, so far as I can see. The
late, and
|>>the consensus seems to be that going with 3.1 as an initial version is a
|>>good idea. I personally endorse this, as I assisted on a bug report
|>>with Eclipse[3] that enables a successful build on PowerPC Linux with
|>>GTK. Prior to the 3.1 development stream, thi
gt; the consensus seems to be that going with 3.1 as an initial version is a
> > good idea. I personally endorse this, as I assisted on a bug report
> > with Eclipse[3] that enables a successful build on PowerPC Linux with
> > GTK. Prior to the 3.1 development stream, this build was ver
and
> the consensus seems to be that going with 3.1 as an initial version is a
> good idea. I personally endorse this, as I assisted on a bug report
> with Eclipse[3] that enables a successful build on PowerPC Linux with
> GTK. Prior to the 3.1 development stream, this build was very brok
itial Source Version
> ~There has been some talk about this on IRC #debian-java of late, and
> the consensus seems to be that going with 3.1 as an initial version is a
> good idea. I personally endorse this, as I assisted on a bug report
> with Eclipse[3] that enables a successful build
to be that going with 3.1 as an initial version is a
good idea. I personally endorse this, as I assisted on a bug report
with Eclipse[3] that enables a successful build on PowerPC Linux with
GTK. Prior to the 3.1 development stream, this build was very broken.
Starting with anything prior to 3.1 wi
Hi Joerg,
We really need to get the Eclipse packaging group up now. Better sooner
then later.
You said in earlier thread on this list that you wanted to setup a
repository at svn.debian.org. What have to done so far? What other
tasks have you don so far for the Eclipse packaging group ?
Micha
Wed, 2005-03-02 at 20:35 +1100, Jamie Jones wrote:
> >G'day,
> >
> >I've been trying to build the eclipse 3 packages from mentors.debian.net
> >(Specifically the eclipse_3.0.1-0wasabi9 packages)
> >
> >I've set up a "sarge" pbuilder environmen
been trying to build the eclipse 3 packages from mentors.debian.net
>(Specifically the eclipse_3.0.1-0wasabi9 packages)
>
>I've set up a "sarge" pbuilder environment with apt source lines
>pointing to sarge, experimental and a local repository containing
>jsch_0.1.19-1 packag
G'day,
I've been trying to build the eclipse 3 packages from mentors.debian.net
(Specifically the eclipse_3.0.1-0wasabi9 packages)
I've set up a "sarge" pbuilder environment with apt source lines
pointing to sarge, experimental and a local repository containing
jsch_0.
}.
|
| However, the "random/path/prefix" may be whatever you like. Eclipse
will by
| default only detect installed extensions in the main eclipse
| directory /usr/lib/eclipse-3
| (or /usr/{lib,share}/eclipse3/{features,plugins}). Auxilary locations
may be
| added to the "auto search path" b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:51:59 +0100,
Karl Trygve Kalleberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PS. I'm the maintainer of Eclipse on Gentoo.
What is Gentoo?
OK, jokin' ;-)
Many thanks for your help and time, Karl. I'd like we could work
together! I also woul
On Friday 12 November 2004 06:14, Barry Hawkins wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> ~I am pretty sure that Eclipse 3.x still relies on the
> eclipse/{plugins/features}/ layout, if I understand your meaning. Can
> you expound on the problems this pre
}/
| layout of this additional sites. I'm not sure whether this has changed
| with the latest changes to the update manager API
|
| I have now orphaned the package, so its up to somebody to pick it up. I
| will be around on ths ML for a while, if there are any questions.
|
| Jan
Jan,
~ I am
rk I posted on another thread
> regarding the build from source with eclipse-ppc-gtk:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2004/10/msg00103.html
>
> I have been using Eclipse 3 of a Debian sid PowerPC install regularly
> for a couple of weeks now, and I feel quite comfortable t
http://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2004/10/msg00103.html
I have been using Eclipse 3 of a Debian sid PowerPC install regularly
for a couple of weeks now, and I feel quite comfortable that we could
reliably package it once all the necessary (and complex) dependencies
upon GTK and SWT packages are worked out.
T
Did anything much ever come of this? pkg-eclipse on alioth looks quite
empty.
Alan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
| Sun, 24 Oct 2004 23:50:13 -0400,
| Barry Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
|
|>List,
|>~After some hours, I have managed to get the build from source to
|>work for the Eclipse 3.01 release code. If you are running Gnome a
Sun, 24 Oct 2004 23:50:13 -0400,
Barry Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> List,
> ~After some hours, I have managed to get the build from source to
> work for the Eclipse 3.01 release code. If you are running Gnome and
> have most of the development libraries installed, your experience ma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
| Wed, 20 Oct 2004 04:03:10 +,
| Barry Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
|
|>>List,
|>>~I am still unable to build Eclipse 3.x from source. As one of the
|>>guys who is volunteering to take over
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 04:03:10 +,
Barry Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> List,
> ~I am still unable to build Eclipse 3.x from source. As one of the
> guys who is volunteering to take over the work on the Eclipse packages,
&
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
List,
~I am still unable to build Eclipse 3.x from source. As one of the
guys who is volunteering to take over the work on the Eclipse packages,
I find Eclipse Bug #57897[0] a bit unsettling. This is something that I
know at least Arnaud has run
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
| Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:16:37 +0200,
| Thomas Fogwill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
|
|>>On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 15:28 +0200, Joerg Wendland wrote:
|>>
|>>>A colleague of mine and me are willing to work on Eclipse packages.
|>>>What abo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:16:37 +0200,
Thomas Fogwill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 15:28 +0200, Joerg Wendland wrote:
>> A colleague of mine and me are willing to work on Eclipse packages.
>> What about creating pkg-eclipse project
Jan Schulz, on 2004-10-12, 14:50, you wrote:
> I have now orphaned the package, so its up to somebody to pick it up. I
> will be around on ths ML for a while, if there are any questions.
So I'll take it and set up a pkg-eclipse project on alioth if nobody
speaks up against this.
Joerg
--
Joerg
On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 15:28 +0200, Joerg Wendland wrote:
> A colleague of mine and me are willing to work on Eclipse packages.
> What about creating pkg-eclipse project and manage the packages as team?
Yes, perhaps that would be the best way to proceed. As mentioned, I have
started (in fits and
Hallo David,
* David Goodenough wrote:
>I seem to recall that there were thought to be problems with some of the
>directory structure that Debian packaging for Eclipse 2 was using, but I have
>heard nothing recently.
No there are not, as far as I can tell. My fist shot was to package
eclipse3 to
Hi David, all,
David Goodenough, on 2004-10-12, 09:29, you wrote:
> Is anyone working on Eclipse 3, and an chance of trying out whatever you
> are working on?
A colleague of mine and me are willing to work on Eclipse packages.
What about creating pkg-eclipse project and manage the packa
On Tue, 2004-10-12 at 10:29 +0200, David Goodenough wrote:
> I seem to recall that there were thought to be problems with some of the
> directory structure that Debian packaging for Eclipse 2 was using, but I
> have
> heard nothing recently.
>
> Is anyone working on Eclipse 3
I seem to recall that there were thought to be problems with some of the
directory structure that Debian packaging for Eclipse 2 was using, but I have
heard nothing recently.
Is anyone working on Eclipse 3, and an chance of trying out whatever you
are working on?
David
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Oct 1, 2004, at 6:37 PM, Thomas Fogwill wrote:
Hi
About 2 weeks ago Jan sent out mail stating his intent to orphan the
eclipse packages, and asking for volunteers to take over.
I'd be very keen to assis
Hi
About 2 weeks ago Jan sent out mail stating his intent to orphan the
eclipse packages, and asking for volunteers to take over.
I'd be very keen to assist with packaging Eclipse, and was wondering
whether anyone else was currently working on it.
I do have 2 problems, though:
- I'm not a DD, so
33 matches
Mail list logo
