Re: Deprecation of *-gcj packages

2013-04-17 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
On 13/04/2013 12:04, Matthias Klose wrote: > Am 12.04.2013 13:41, schrieb Sylvestre Ledru: >> Hello, >> >> Maybe I am missing a point but I have the feeling that the -gcj packages >> are now a bit useless. > > no. why should they be useless? As I said, it was my perception. Looks like I was wrong

Re: Deprecation of *-gcj packages

2013-04-13 Thread Matthias Klose
Am 12.04.2013 13:41, schrieb Sylvestre Ledru: > Hello, > > Maybe I am missing a point but I have the feeling that the -gcj packages > are now a bit useless. no. why should they be useless? > gcj does not seem a very active project [1] and my perception is that > not many people are using gcj pac

Re: Deprecation of *-gcj packages

2013-04-12 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 12/04/2013 13:41, Sylvestre Ledru a écrit : > Maybe I am missing a point but I have the feeling that the -gcj packages > are now a bit useless. > gcj does not seem a very active project [1] and my perception is that > not many people are using gcj packages instead > of the "java package". I wa

Re: Deprecation of *-gcj packages

2013-04-12 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2013-04-12 13:41, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > Hello, > Hey, > Maybe I am missing a point but I have the feeling that the -gcj packages > are now a bit useless. > gcj does not seem a very active project [1] and my perception is that > not many people are using gcj packages instead of the "java pa

Re: Deprecation of *-gcj packages

2013-04-12 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > Hello, > > Maybe I am missing a point but I have the feeling that the -gcj packages > are now a bit useless. > gcj does not seem a very active project [1] and my perception is that > not many people are using gcj packages instead > of the "

Deprecation of *-gcj packages

2013-04-12 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Hello, Maybe I am missing a point but I have the feeling that the -gcj packages are now a bit useless. gcj does not seem a very active project [1] and my perception is that not many people are using gcj packages instead of the "java package". For example, two "famous" java packages providing -gcj