Hello,
* Thomas J. Zeeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It looks good. It seems I should modify eclipse code for it:(
> Yup. As someone else already mentioned, eclipse is very single-user pc
> minded. :(
There is a discussion on "starting and updating eclipse":
http://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_
Hello,
* Thomas J. Zeeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It looks good. It seems I should modify eclipse code for it:(
> Yup. As someone else already mentioned, eclipse is very single-user pc
> minded. :(
There is a discussion on "starting and updating eclipse":
http://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_
Takashi Okamoto said:
Takashi-
> Lucene is depend on javacc to build package, so you have to install
> JavaCC into /usr/local/javacc2.1.
Since I'm running with a chroot, I took a few extra moments to make a
small package out of javacc. I added it to the Build-Depends and put it
out on a local mi
Takashi Okamoto said:
Takashi-
> Lucene is depend on javacc to build package, so you have to install
> JavaCC into /usr/local/javacc2.1.
Since I'm running with a chroot, I took a few extra moments to make a
small package out of javacc. I added it to the Build-Depends and put it
out on a local mi
Hi John,
From: John Lavin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 10:30:01 -0500
> dh_testdir
> mkdir -p /tmp/buildd/lucene-1.2/source-tree/lucene-1.2-src/bin/docs/api
> mkdir -p /tmp/buildd/lucene-1.2/source-tree/lucene-1.2-src/docs
Hi John,
From: John Lavin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 10:30:01 -0500
> dh_testdir
> mkdir -p /tmp/buildd/lucene-1.2/source-tree/lucene-1.2-src/bin/docs/api
> mkdir -p /tmp/buildd/lucene-1.2/source-tree/lucene-1.2-src/docs
Takashi Okamoto said:
> I uploaded initial eclipse 2.1M4 package though it may very ugly
> now. Please check here:
Takashi-
Moved on to this package- trying to once again back-build to woody with
some upgraded sid java packages (xerces in particular). When trying to
build lucene, I get the follo
On Monday 17 February 2003 12:19, Thomas J. Zeeman wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Takashi Okamoto wrote:
[snip]
> >
> > I don't know how I can resolve it now. Wait until I find cause or
> > resolve it by yourself.
>
> For this one I was just wondering if I was the only one to notice this.
> I'll lo
Takashi Okamoto said:
> I uploaded initial eclipse 2.1M4 package though it may very ugly
> now. Please check here:
Takashi-
Moved on to this package- trying to once again back-build to woody with
some upgraded sid java packages (xerces in particular). When trying to
build lucene, I get the follo
On Monday 17 February 2003 12:19, Thomas J. Zeeman wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Takashi Okamoto wrote:
[snip]
> >
> > I don't know how I can resolve it now. Wait until I find cause or
> > resolve it by yourself.
>
> For this one I was just wondering if I was the only one to notice this.
> I'll lo
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Takashi Okamoto wrote:
> From: "Thomas J. Zeeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5
> Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 13:57:41 +0100 (CET)
> > There's another problem as well, those dirs are only available for
> >
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Takashi Okamoto wrote:
> From: "Thomas J. Zeeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5
> Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 13:57:41 +0100 (CET)
> > There's another problem as well, those dirs are only available for
> >
> "Takashi" == Takashi Okamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> There's another problem as well, those dirs are only available for
>> installation by root. A workaround is to install it in your private
>> workspace.
Takashi> It looks good. It seems I should modify eclipse code for it:(
Eclips
> "Takashi" == Takashi Okamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> There's another problem as well, those dirs are only available for
>> installation by root. A workaround is to install it in your private
>> workspace.
Takashi> It looks good. It seems I should modify eclipse code for it:(
Eclips
> > Just tried that and it seems to work; there're a few
> > nuissances with this option, but no showstoppers.
>
> Pardon, what does 'nuissances' mean? I can't find such a word in my
> dictionary.
Just a misspelling of nuisance, I think. :)
KEN
--
Kenneth J. Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Perso
> > Just tried that and it seems to work; there're a few
> > nuissances with this option, but no showstoppers.
>
> Pardon, what does 'nuissances' mean? I can't find such a word in my
> dictionary.
Just a misspelling of nuisance, I think. :)
KEN
--
Kenneth J. Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Perso
From: "Thomas J. Zeeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 13:57:41 +0100 (CET)
> There's another problem as well, those dirs are only available for
> installation by root. A workaround is to install it in your private
>
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Takashi Okamoto wrote:
> From: "Caoilte O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5
> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 13:55:46 +
> > I want to install the easystruts plugin. so i,
> > ...
> > It's
From: "Thomas J. Zeeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 13:57:41 +0100 (CET)
> There's another problem as well, those dirs are only available for
> installation by root. A workaround is to install it in your private
>
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Takashi Okamoto wrote:
> From: "Caoilte O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5
> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 13:55:46 +
> > I want to install the easystruts plugin. so i,
> > ...
> > It's
From: "Caoilte O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 13:55:46 +
> I want to install the easystruts plugin. so i,
> ...
> It's like the gtk widget being used is broken and I can't select an install
>
From: "Caoilte O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 13:55:46 +
> I want to install the easystruts plugin. so i,
> ...
> It's like the gtk widget being used is broken and I can't select an install
>
From: Roberto Franchini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 10:52:00 +0100
> I think it could be related to permissions. But, wtih 2.0.2, I tried
> from root too, and it didn't work, so I installed the plugins by hand.
I confirmed
From: Roberto Franchini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 10:52:00 +0100
> I think it could be related to permissions. But, wtih 2.0.2, I tried
> from root too, and it didn't work, so I installed the plugins by hand.
I confirmed
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 09:55, Caoilte O'Connor wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 February 2003 8:02 am, Roberto Franchini wrote:
> > On Tuesday 11 February 2003 19:46, Thomas J. Zeeman wrote:
> > [sinp]
> >
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > > > 7) and click next until it asks for "install selection"
> > > > 8)
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 8:02 am, Roberto Franchini wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 February 2003 19:46, Thomas J. Zeeman wrote:
> [sinp]
>
> > [snip]
> >
> > > 7) and click next until it asks for "install selection"
> > > 8) then try and select an install selection
> > > 9) fail
> > >
> > > It's like
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 19:46, Thomas J. Zeeman wrote:
[sinp]
>
> [snip]
>
> > 7) and click next until it asks for "install selection"
> > 8) then try and select an install selection
> > 9) fail
> >
> > It's like the gtk widget being used is broken and I can't select an
> > install location, be
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 09:55, Caoilte O'Connor wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 February 2003 8:02 am, Roberto Franchini wrote:
> > On Tuesday 11 February 2003 19:46, Thomas J. Zeeman wrote:
> > [sinp]
> >
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > > > 7) and click next until it asks for "install selection"
> > > > 8)
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 8:02 am, Roberto Franchini wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 February 2003 19:46, Thomas J. Zeeman wrote:
> [sinp]
>
> > [snip]
> >
> > > 7) and click next until it asks for "install selection"
> > > 8) then try and select an install selection
> > > 9) fail
> > >
> > > It's like
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 19:46, Thomas J. Zeeman wrote:
[sinp]
>
> [snip]
>
> > 7) and click next until it asks for "install selection"
> > 8) then try and select an install selection
> > 9) fail
> >
> > It's like the gtk widget being used is broken and I can't select an
> > install location, be
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Caoilte O'Connor wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 February 2003 10:17 am, Takashi Okamoto wrote:
> > I rebuild on Eclipse with sid. But 2.1M5 didn't work with libmotif3. I
> > changed to gtk binding and uploaded new packages.
> >
> > New packages should work and build with sid. Howeve
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Caoilte O'Connor wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 February 2003 10:17 am, Takashi Okamoto wrote:
> > I rebuild on Eclipse with sid. But 2.1M5 didn't work with libmotif3. I
> > changed to gtk binding and uploaded new packages.
> >
> > New packages should work and build with sid. Howeve
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 10:17 am, Takashi Okamoto wrote:
> From: Roberto Franchini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5
> Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 15:18:47 +0100
>
> > I can't install libmotif, since libmotif doesn't exists. On my
>
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Takashi Okamoto wrote:
> From: Roberto Franchini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5
> Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 15:18:47 +0100
> > I can't install libmotif, since libmotif doesn't exists. On my workstation
> >
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 10:17 am, Takashi Okamoto wrote:
> From: Roberto Franchini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5
> Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 15:18:47 +0100
>
> > I can't install libmotif, since libmotif doesn't exists. On my
>
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 11:17, Takashi Okamoto wrote:
> From: Roberto Franchini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5
> Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 15:18:47 +0100
>
> > I can't install libmotif, since libmotif doesn't exists. On my
>
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Takashi Okamoto wrote:
> From: Roberto Franchini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5
> Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 15:18:47 +0100
> > I can't install libmotif, since libmotif doesn't exists. On my workstation
> >
From: Roberto Franchini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 15:18:47 +0100
> I can't install libmotif, since libmotif doesn't exists. On my workstation
> I've got libmotif3 an lesstif2.
I rebuild on Eclipse with sid.
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 11:17, Takashi Okamoto wrote:
> From: Roberto Franchini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5
> Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 15:18:47 +0100
>
> > I can't install libmotif, since libmotif doesn't exists. On my
>
From: Roberto Franchini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 15:18:47 +0100
> I can't install libmotif, since libmotif doesn't exists. On my workstation
> I've got libmotif3 an lesstif2.
I rebuild on Eclipse with sid.
On Monday 10 February 2003 14:56, Takashi Okamoto wrote:
> From: Roberto Franchini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5
> Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 13:31:36 +0100
>
> > I try this packages, but somethig doesn't works.
> > I can't inst
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Roberto Franchini wrote:
> On Sunday 09 February 2003 02:52, Takashi Okamoto wrote:
> > I uploaded initial eclipse 2.1M4 package though it may very ugly
> > now. Please check here:
> >
> > http://yamaguch.sytes.net/~tora/tmp/eclipse
>
> I try this packages, but somethig doe
From: Roberto Franchini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 13:31:36 +0100
> I try this packages, but somethig doesn't works.
> I can't install libeclipse and Eclipse doesn't start with old libeclise
> installed
thnaks,
On Sunday 09 February 2003 02:52, Takashi Okamoto wrote:
> I uploaded initial eclipse 2.1M4 package though it may very ugly
> now. Please check here:
>
> http://yamaguch.sytes.net/~tora/tmp/eclipse
I try this packages, but somethig doesn't works.
I can't install libeclipse and Eclipse doesn't sta
On Monday 10 February 2003 14:56, Takashi Okamoto wrote:
> From: Roberto Franchini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5
> Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 13:31:36 +0100
>
> > I try this packages, but somethig doesn't works.
> > I can't inst
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Roberto Franchini wrote:
> On Sunday 09 February 2003 02:52, Takashi Okamoto wrote:
> > I uploaded initial eclipse 2.1M4 package though it may very ugly
> > now. Please check here:
> >
> > http://yamaguch.sytes.net/~tora/tmp/eclipse
>
> I try this packages, but somethig doe
From: Roberto Franchini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 13:31:36 +0100
> I try this packages, but somethig doesn't works.
> I can't install libeclipse and Eclipse doesn't start with old libeclise
> installed
thnaks,
On Sunday 09 February 2003 02:52, Takashi Okamoto wrote:
> I uploaded initial eclipse 2.1M4 package though it may very ugly
> now. Please check here:
>
> http://yamaguch.sytes.net/~tora/tmp/eclipse
I try this packages, but somethig doesn't works.
I can't install libeclipse and Eclipse doesn't sta
I uploaded initial eclipse 2.1M4 package though it may very ugly
now. Please check here:
http://yamaguch.sytes.net/~tora/tmp/eclipse
Takashi Okamoto
I uploaded initial eclipse 2.1M4 package though it may very ugly
now. Please check here:
http://yamaguch.sytes.net/~tora/tmp/eclipse
Takashi Okamoto
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
50 matches
Mail list logo
