On Friday 12 March 2004 01:23, Per Bothner wrote:
> Chris Gray wrote:
> > On Thursday 11 March 2004 18:44, Mark Howard wrote:
> >>The big question is: should we switch to CNI?
> >
> > No.
>
> Though I'm obviously in the CNI "camp", I tend to agree.
>
> But I think the folloup-question is: should ja
Hi,
> Anyone who uses the java-gnome libraries in a GUI-based Java
> application is risking tying that application into GNOME. By contrast,
> if they use Swing or SWT, they can easily port the application across a
> wide range of supported platforms.
Let me point that I can run popular GTK apps
Mark,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> On Thursday 11 March 2004 18:44, Mark Howard wrote:
> > The big question is: should we switch to CNI?
>
> No.
I agree with Chris 100%. [Or perhaps I should say 110% :-)]
JNI is the standard for portably calling C / C++ from Java. It works
well enough for the jo
On Thursday 11 March 2004 18:44, Mark Howard wrote:
> Dear Java Developers,
>
> I am writing to you on behalf of the java-gnome project for advice
> regarding a major change we are currently considering. I apologise if
> this is off topic for this mailing list but we really need input and you
> are
Chris Gray wrote:
On Thursday 11 March 2004 18:44, Mark Howard wrote:
The big question is: should we switch to CNI?
No.
Though I'm obviously in the CNI "camp", I tend to agree.
But I think the folloup-question is: should java-gnome
switch from JNI-only implementation to some kind of dual
JNI-or-C
5 matches
Mail list logo
