Mark, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > On Thursday 11 March 2004 18:44, Mark Howard wrote: > > The big question is: should we switch to CNI? > > No.
I agree with Chris 100%. [Or perhaps I should say 110% :-)] JNI is the standard for portably calling C / C++ from Java. It works well enough for the job. Implementing CNI instead does your users a major disservice by tying them to Java implementations that support CNI. Actually, I reckon that the same argument applies to java-gnome in general. Anyone who uses the java-gnome libraries in a GUI-based Java application is risking tying that application into GNOME. By contrast, if they use Swing or SWT, they can easily port the application across a wide range of supported platforms. [There is a counter-argument that says that java-gnome will maximise integration with GNOME's look and feel, etc. My counter to that is that this is not the highest priority for most Java projects. For most, immediate portability or avoiding platform/vendor tie-in are equally, if not more important. Otherwise they'd probably be using .NET on a Windows machine ;-)] I'm assuming, without any evidence, that the java-gnome plans don't include backends to graphics libraries other than the gtk/gnome ones. If that's wrong, java-gnome is not quite so bad. However, I still reckon it would be risky to use java-gnome (instead of Swing or SWT) in a major Java development project. (For a start, the project would be screwed if java-gnome faded away.) IMO, this really leaves java-gnome as only being useful for minor Java applications for the GNOME platform. At which point I would ask myself "why bother"? I note your issues re JNI vs CNI performance, code size and ease of development. I suggest that the first two issues will rarely much to the end users of software that uses java-gnome. The third issue will only impact on the tiny group of people who develop and maintain java-gnome itself. Most developers should be working in the pure Java space. [Think of it this way ... if Sun had perceived these to be major issues for their customers, they would probably have replaced JNI by now!] -- Steve -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
