Re: RFS/RFC: maven-debian-helper 1.6.5

2013-08-17 Thread Wolodja Wentland
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 14:56 +0200, Wolodja Wentland wrote: > I've been using the debhelper build system that ships with maven-debian-helper > for one package and ran into a number of inconsistencies between it and the > CDBS build. Hunting down the differences took some time, but

clojure-maven-helper, maven-javadoc-plugin and #711852

2013-08-17 Thread Wolodja Wentland
Hi all, I am running into a problem during the apidoc generation phase when using maven-debian-helper [0] ever since the maven target to generate the documentation was changed from "javadoc:jar" to "javadoc:javadoc". This was done to fix #711852 and I was under the impression after a short glimpse

RFS/RFC: maven-debian-helper 1.6.5

2013-08-17 Thread Wolodja Wentland
Hi all, I've been using the debhelper build system that ships with maven-debian-helper for one package and ran into a number of inconsistencies between it and the CDBS build. Hunting down the differences took some time, but it essentially boiled down to comparing share/perl/maven.pm with share/cdb

Re: dh and maven

2013-08-10 Thread Wolodja Wentland
Hi Jakub, On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 20:51 +0200, Jakub Adam wrote: > On 7.8.2013 20:35, Wolodja Wentland wrote: > >Oh, that is great to hear. Where can I find additional information about this > >dh based build system? I would very much prefer to use that in lieu of CDBS > >

Re: dh and maven

2013-08-07 Thread Wolodja Wentland
Hi Jakub, On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 20:51 +0200, Jakub Adam wrote: > On 7.8.2013 20:35, Wolodja Wentland wrote: > >Oh, that is great to hear. Where can I find additional information about this > >dh based build system? I would very much prefer to use that in lieu of CDBS > >

dh and maven

2013-08-07 Thread Wolodja Wentland
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 20:17 +0200, Jakub Adam wrote: > On 7.8.2013 20:06, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > >How can I reproduce this issue? I have never observed a regenerated > >.poms file. I did see updated headers after the build in the .poms files > >and the Maven rules files, but the content was neve

Re: please don't fork javahelper

2013-06-09 Thread Wolodja Wentland
On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 13:03 -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 06:24:25PM +0200, Thomas Koch wrote: > > So your plan to fork javahelper and to create just another packaging tool > > terrified me. Are you really sure that you need to fork javahelper and that > > you > > c

jackson licensing (was: Re: Frustration with trying to build Debian packages from Maven-based sources)

2013-03-19 Thread Wolodja Wentland
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 01:10 +0100, Hilko Bengen wrote: > * Wolodja Wentland: > > > On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 16:47 +0100, Hilko Bengen wrote: > > > >> Initially, all I wanted to do was to build a proper Debian package for > >> ElasticSearch (#660826). It t

Re: Frustration with trying to build Debian packages from Maven-based sources

2013-03-18 Thread Wolodja Wentland
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 09:27 +, Wolodja Wentland wrote: > On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 16:47 +0100, Hilko Bengen wrote: > > > Initially, all I wanted to do was to build a proper Debian package for > > ElasticSearch (#660826). It turns out that some needed > > build-depend

Re: Frustration with trying to build Debian packages from Maven-based sources

2013-03-18 Thread Wolodja Wentland
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 16:47 +0100, Hilko Bengen wrote: > Initially, all I wanted to do was to build a proper Debian package for > ElasticSearch (#660826). It turns out that some needed > build-dependencies are not in Debian yet, so I start with version 2 of > jackson-core by downloading the jack

Re: Maven auto packager idea

2013-03-14 Thread Wolodja Wentland
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:14 +0100, Thomas Koch wrote: > Boris Ribalkin: > > Hi Thomas, > > > > Could you point me to the sources/binaries, so I can get the idea of what > > exactly to expect? > > You can follow the git repositories of maven-*-helper packages: > > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitw

Re: Debian Java Policy and JVM languages family package names

2013-01-26 Thread Wolodja Wentland
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 15:56 -0300, Miguel Landaeta wrote: > Some days ago I noticed a new package queued at NEW named > libtools-macro-clojure[1] and that reminded me about how I don't > remember about any discussion or some formal document with a > description about how library packages of JVM l

Re: Uploading clooj

2011-11-04 Thread Wolodja Wentland
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 01:18 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 10:41 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: > > That being said - it appears to trying to download maven stuff online > > and then the build seems to hang (though admittedly I had a rather short > > patience after seeing t

Clojure maintenance / leiningen

2011-07-18 Thread Wolodja Wentland
s-Browser: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-java/leiningen.git That's it for now. -- .''`. Wolodja Wentland : :' : `. `'` 4096R/CAF14EFC `- 081C B7CD FF04 2BA9 94EA 36B2 8B7F 7D30 CAF1 4EFC signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Clojure team or maintainence within pkg-java?

2011-07-06 Thread Wolodja Wentland
elatively small task of getting Leiningen > and its four dependencies into the repositories, so let's not over-extend > our reach with premature packaging. +1 -- .''`. Wolodja Wentland : :' : `. `'` 4096R/CAF14EFC `- 081C B7CD FF04 2BA9 94EA 36B2 8B7F 7D30 CAF1 4EFC signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Clojure team or maintainence within pkg-java?

2011-07-06 Thread Wolodja Wentland
"based-on-JVM" languages maintained by the Java team? Our general tendency seems to be that we favour the creation of a new team, but I would love to get some additional feedback. Ta! -- .''`. Wolodja Wentland : :' : `. `'` 4096R/CAF14EFC `-